Wednesday, August 19, 2026

🇮🇶💰 IRAQ REOPENS THE PUBLIC FUNDS FILE — AND “DELETE THE ZEROS” RETURNS TO THE REFORM AGENDA 🏦🔥

 🇮🇶💰 IRAQ REOPENS THE PUBLIC FUNDS FILE — AND “DELETE THE ZEROS” RETURNS TO THE REFORM AGENDA 🏦🔥

Iraq is bringing a broad package of financial, economic, and monetary reforms back into focus, with proposals targeting public spending, corruption, illicit wealth, money laundering, and the structure of the Iraqi monetary system. 🇮🇶📊

💰 WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED?

Among the measures being discussed are:

🔹 Stronger financial-asset disclosure requirements for officials
🔹 Greater scrutiny of unexplained increases in wealth
🔹 Action against illicit enrichment
🔹 Restrictions on receiving multiple government salaries
🔹 Reform of official privileges and allowances
🔹 Reduction and control of government spending
🔹 Recovery of smuggled funds
🔹 Stronger anti-money-laundering measures
🔹 Bringing informal capital back into the formal banking system 🏦

🔥 AND THEN COMES “DELETE THE ZEROS”

One of the most controversial proposals mentioned is removing zeros from the Iraqi dinar, described as part of a broader strategy to reform Iraq’s monetary system.

The key point is that the article does not present removing zeros as an isolated currency move.

Instead, it connects the project to:

💵 Money-supply management
🏦 Banking-sector strengthening
📉 Inflation control
💰 Recovery of funds outside the formal system
🔎 Greater financial transparency
🇮🇶 Stronger confidence in the Iraqi dinar

The article also makes an important distinction: removing three zeros does not automatically mean that the dinar gains three zeros of purchasing power.

The success of a redenomination would depend on the broader economic environment and how the transition is implemented across prices, salaries, contracts, savings, and commercial transactions.

🏦 THE BIGGER PICTURE

This is where the story becomes particularly interesting.

The proposal places Delete the Zeros inside a much larger financial transformation:

Control illicit funds
⬇️
Bring informal capital into banks
⬇️
Strengthen the banking system
⬇️
Improve monetary control
⬇️
Reform government spending
⬇️
Strengthen the Iraqi financial system
⬇️
Create the conditions for monetary reform 🇮🇶💱

🔥 The message is clear: the battle is not simply about changing the numbers printed on Iraqi banknotes.

It is about restructuring how money moves through the entire Iraqi economy.

And if “Delete the Zeros” eventually moves forward as part of this broader reform program, it could represent one component of a much larger transformation of Iraq’s monetary and financial system. 🏦🇮🇶💵


🔗📢 FOLLOW & JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

#Iraq #IraqiDinar #IQD #DeleteTheZeros #CBI #CentralBankOfIraq #MonetaryReform #FinancialReform #IraqEconomy #CurrencyReform #DinarNews #IraqNews #BankingReform #MoneyLaundering #EconomicReform

-----

IRAQ OPENS THE FILE ON PUBLIC FUNDS: STRIKING AT PRIVILEGES AND REMOVING ZEROS

Amid the financial and economic pressures facing the Iraqi state, the files of public funds, privileges, double salaries, and reforming the monetary system are returning to the forefront of discussion within the House of Representatives, with a set of proposals aimed at rearranging government spending, tightening control over the wealth of officials, and strengthening the position of the Iraqi dinar.

The proposals put forward do not stop at amending one law, but open a wider discussion about the form of the state’s financial management, the size of spending on officials, and the extent to which regulatory institutions are able to uncover illicit funds, leading up to a controversial proposal related to removing zeros from the Iraqi currency.

At the forefront of the files is the proposal to amend the Integrity and Illicit Gains Authority Law, with the aim of tightening the procedures for disclosing financial assets and holding accountable those taxpayers who show a large and unjustified increase in their funds.

This issue is of particular importance in a country that has been suffering for years from the challenges of corruption and abuse of power, since combating illicit enrichment does not depend solely on penalties after the violation has occurred, but requires an effective system to monitor the growth of wealth and link financial declarations to banking, real estate and commercial information.

The proposals also aim to tighten procedures against those who refuse to submit financial disclosure statements, with violators being referred to the judiciary if illicit gains are proven.

The most politically and popularly sensitive issue is related to double salaries and financial privileges, where it was proposed to prevent one person from receiving more than one salary under any title, in addition to reorganizing a set of benefits that officials and employees in state institutions receive.

The idea here is based on a simple principle: Citizens cannot be asked to rationalize their spending while the doors of government privileges remain open without clear limits.

In the same context, one of the proposals includes setting a fixed monthly salary for a member of the House of Representatives worth five million dinars, while regulating allowances and privileges, reducing the number of employees, security personnel, escorts and advisors, in addition to controlling the use of government cars and aircraft and subjecting spending to the control of the competent authorities.

These measures, if they are turned into effective legislation and actually implemented, could provide significant sums for the treasury, but at the same time they will face a difficult political test, because reforming privileges often clashes with the interests of those who benefit from them.

In a parallel track, another proposal emerged concerning the reform of the financial and monetary system, which includes combating money laundering, restricting the movement of funds within official banking channels, recovering smuggled funds, and bringing informal capital into the economic cycle.

But the most controversial proposal is to remove zeros from the Iraqi dinar, or what is known as renaming the currency, as part of a broader strategy to reform the monetary system.

Here, a distinction must be made between removing zeros and increasing the real value of the currency. Removing three zeros, for example, does not automatically mean that citizens have become wealthier or that the purchasing power of the dinar has increased; the success of this step depends on economic stability, controlling inflation, managing the money supply, the strength of the banking system, and citizens’ confidence in the currency.

Therefore, any project to rename the dinar needs careful study and a clear transition mechanism that ensures there is no confusion in prices, contracts, salaries, savings, and commercial transactions.

The Iraqi problem is not just in the form of the currency, but in an entire economic system that needs simultaneous reforms that include banks, non-oil revenues, government spending, tax evasion, money laundering, the exchange market, and the monetary economy.

Hence, removing zeros, if done alone, may be a mere arithmetic change, whereas if it comes as part of an integrated economic program, it may become part of a broader monetary reform process.

Ultimately, Iraq has an opportunity to reopen the public finance file from a different angle: reducing privileges, combating illicit gains, controlling double salaries, recovering smuggled funds, and reforming the monetary system. But the success of these ideas will not be measured by the number of proposals that reach parliament, but rather by the state’s ability to turn them into fair laws that apply to everyone without exception.

True financial reform does not begin with simply removing three zeros, nor with reducing an official’s salary, but rather with building a state that knows where its money goes, who receives it, and how to protect it from waste and corruption.

The real battle is not with the zeros on the currency, but with the zeros in the accounts of oversight and accountability.


🇮🇶🏦🔥 MNT GOAT: “DELETE THE ZEROS” MAY BE ENTERING A NEW PHASE — CBI CONTACT REVEALS KEY DEVELOPMENTS

🇮🇶🏦🔥 MNT GOAT: “DELETE THE ZEROS” MAY BE ENTERING A NEW PHASE — CBI CONTACT REVEALS KEY DEVELOPMENTS

MNT GOAT is reporting what she describes as major developments surrounding Iraq’s long-discussed “Project to Delete the Zeros.” 🇮🇶💵

According to her report, the most important part of the latest information comes from her contact inside the Central Bank of Iraq (CBI)—who she says was personally involved in a recent high-level meeting concerning the legal changes needed to move the project forward. 🏦📜

🔎 WHAT DID HER CBI CONTACT COMMUNICATE?

MNT GOAT says her CBI contact was the CBI representative who attended an important meeting with the Iraqi government, Ali al-Zaidi, and the head of the Finance Committee.

The meeting reportedly focused on amendments to a long-standing law connected to the removal of zeros from the Iraqi dinar. 🇮🇶⚖️

According to MNT GOAT, the necessary amendments were discussed, and the legislation was forwarded to Parliament for implementation. 🏛️📄

Her contact then reportedly took the information from the meeting back to the CBI, giving MNT GOAT what she considers a direct connection between the legislative process and the Central Bank.

🏦 WHY IS THE CBI CONNECTION IMPORTANT?

The CBI is Iraq’s monetary authority, so MNT GOAT is particularly focused on what the Central Bank will do next.

She says she is now waiting for the CBI itself to publicly confirm that it is moving forward with the process.

The potential sequence she describes is:

📌 Government & Finance Committee discussions
⬇️
📜 Amendments to the existing legislation
⬇️
🏛️ Legislation forwarded to Parliament
⬇️
🇮🇶 Parliamentary action
⬇️
🏦 CBI confirmation and implementation
⬇️
📣 Possible public education regarding the currency exchange process
⬇️
💵 Implementation of the “Delete the Zeros” project

🚨 ANOTHER IMPORTANT DEVELOPMENT

MNT GOAT also highlights a recent statement attributed to Iraq’s Communications Minister Mustafa Sanad indicating that Iraq has decided to remove zeros from the dinar and reprint the currency.

She connects this announcement with the information received from her CBI contact and believes the pieces are now beginning to come together around the Delete the Zeros project. 🔥🇮🇶

💡 WHAT MNT GOAT IS WATCHING NOW

According to her report, the next major developments to watch are:

🔹 What happens with the legislation in Parliament
🔹 Whether the legal amendments are approved
🔹 When the CBI publicly confirms the project
🔹 Whether the CBI establishes a timeline
🔹 Whether Iraq begins an educational/public-information phase
🔹 How the exchange of existing currency for the new denominations would be carried out

For MNT GOAT, the significance of the latest information is that Delete the Zeros is no longer being discussed only as a long-term monetary project. She believes the project is now connected to an active process involving the Government of Iraq, the Finance Committee, Parliament, and the CBI. 🇮🇶🏦📜

🔥 The big question now: What will the CBI communicate publicly once the legislative process moves forward?


🔗📢 FOLLOW & JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

#Iraq #IraqiDinar #IQD #DeleteTheZeros #CBI #CentralBankOfIraq #MonetaryReform #IraqEconomy #DinarNews #IraqNews #CurrencyReform #DinarRevaluation #RV #IraqFinance

https://mntgoatnewsusa.com/latest-mnt-goat-newsletter/

Iraq’s Article 140: Kirkuk’s Future Remains in Limbo — But Who Benefits From Keeping It That Way?

 



🔗📢 FOLLOW & JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

Tuesday, August 18, 2026

🇮🇶🔥 IRAN, IRAQ & THE BREAKING POINT: WHAT IS REALLY AT STAKE?

 CHANNEL8

Tasnim News Agency reported that Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, heading a high-level parliamentary delegation, will discuss regional developments and strengthen cooperation between Tehran and Baghdad with senior Iraqi officials and leaders.

----

🇮🇶🔥 IRAN, IRAQ & THE BREAKING POINT: WHAT IS REALLY AT STAKE?

📰 NEWS SUMMARY

Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Speaker of Iran’s Parliament, is heading a high-level parliamentary delegation to Baghdad to meet with senior Iraqi officials and leaders.

The stated objective is to discuss regional developments and strengthen cooperation between Tehran and Baghdad.

📌 But the timing of this visit is what immediately catches my attention.

Iraq is approaching September 30, the date by which armed militias operating outside state control are expected to move toward disarmament and dissolution.

And now, precisely during this critical period, Tehran is increasing its political engagement with Baghdad. 🇮🇷👀🇮🇶


🇮🇷 ARE WE WATCHING A DESPERATE IRAN?

This is where the analysis begins.

We cannot state as a proven fact that Ghalibaf’s visit is intended to prevent the disarmament of the militias. Additional evidence would be required to establish that.

But the timing is impossible to ignore.

A genuine reduction of the armed structures of pro-Iranian factions inside Iraq would also mean a reduction of one of Tehran’s major mechanisms of political influence inside Iraq.

So the question becomes:

👉 Is Iran trying to preserve its political influence in Baghdad while Iraq prepares to reduce the influence of the militias?


🧩 AND THIS IS WHERE AL-MALIKI ENTERS THE PICTURE...

If we look at the situation from this perspective, the political role of figures historically aligned with Iran becomes even more important.

The issue is not simply WHO holds a political position.

The bigger question is:

❗WHO WILL HAVE INFLUENCE OVER THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THE DISARMAMENT TAKES PLACE?

Because there is a massive difference between:

🔴 REAL DISARMAMENT:
Weapons are placed under the exclusive control of the Iraqi state and autonomous armed structures disappear.

🟡 A “COSMETIC” DISARMAMENT:
The same structures retain influence, resources and political leverage, but operate under a different name or institutional formula.

That distinction could be critical for Iraq’s political future.


💥 REMEMBER WHAT THE CBI CONTACT SAID

I want everyone to remember something we discussed previously.

According to the information from the CBI Contact, Iranian influence inside Iraq would be a determining factor in whether the “Delete the Zeros” project can move forward.

The message was clear:

🇮🇶 IRAQ MUST ELIMINATE IRANIAN INFLUENCE BEFORE THE DELETE THE ZEROS PROJECT CAN BE ACTIVATED.

⚠️ This is NOT a public statement from the CBI. It should be understood as information attributed to the CBI Contact and something we continue to watch and compare against public developments.

But now...

LOOK AT THE BIGGER PICTURE.


🧩 THE PIECES MAY BE CONNECTING

If we temporarily accept that information as one piece of the puzzle, the sequence becomes extremely interesting:

🇮🇷 REDUCTION OF IRANIAN INFLUENCE

⬇️

🪖 DISARMAMENT / DISSOLUTION OF MILITIAS

⬇️

🇮🇶 GREATER SOVEREIGNTY OF THE IRAQI STATE

⬇️

🔒 LESS EXTERNAL INTERFERENCE

⬇️

🏦 POLITICAL CONDITIONS FOR STRATEGIC REFORMS

⬇️

💵 DELETE THE ZEROS

Does this guarantee that this exact sequence will happen?

NO.

But if what the CBI Contact said is accurate, then the events we are watching could be far more important than they appear on the surface.


👀 NOW ALL EYES ARE ON AL-ZAIDI

For me, this is THE REAL POINT OF OBSERVATION.

What will Al-Zaidi do?

If he keeps the September 30 timeline firm, insists that weapons truly come under state control, and rejects formulas that simply change the name of the militias...

🔥 THAT WOULD BE A VERY IMPORTANT SIGNAL.

But if we begin to see:

❌ Delays
❌ Exceptions
❌ New “integration” formulas
❌ Parallel structures
❌ Agreements allowing factions to retain autonomy
❌ Political concessions preserving Iranian influence

then we have to ask whether we are witnessing precisely the “cosmetic disarmament” we have been talking about.


🎯 THE BIG QUESTION

Is Iran simply strengthening normal cooperation with Iraq?

Or is Tehran attempting to preserve its political influence in Baghdad before Iraq reaches the breaking point?

And most importantly:

🇮🇶🔥 WILL AL-ZAIDI HAVE THE POLITICAL STRENGTH TO SAY “NO” TO THAT PRESSURE?

Because if what the CBI Contact said is correct, the Iranian issue may be much more than geopolitics.

💥 IT COULD BE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO MOVE FORWARD WITH DELETE THE ZEROS.

That is why we watch.

NO RUMORS.
NO EUPHORIA.
FACTS.
👀

🇮🇶💪 IRAQ FIRST.

🔗📢 FOLLOW & JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

📌 X (TWITTER): https://x.com/DinarWatchTeam

📌 BLUESKY: https://bsky.app/profile/dinaresgurus.bsky.social

#Iraq #Iran #AlZaidi #AlMaliki #Ghalibaf #CBI #CBIContact #CentralBankOfIraq #DeleteTheZeros #IraqiDinar #CurrencyReform #MonetaryReform #IraqNews #IraqPolitics #IranInfluence #Militias #Disarmament #Baghdad #Tehran #RV #IQD

🇮🇶 MALIKI AND IRAQ’S WEAPONS: SOVEREIGNTY OR POLITICAL COVER?

 CHANNEL8

Nouri al-Maliki and US Chargé d'Affaires Joshua Harris have discussed efforts to place weapons under state control and strengthen Iraq’s constitutional institutions.

🇮🇶 MALIKI AND IRAQ’S WEAPONS: SOVEREIGNTY OR POLITICAL COVER?

NEWS SUMMARY

Nouri al-Maliki and U.S. Chargé d’Affaires Joshua Harris discussed efforts to place weapons under state control and strengthen Iraq’s constitutional institutions.

Maliki is also involved in the Coordination Framework’s efforts to establish a mechanism to advance this process.

🔥 BUT HERE IS WHERE IT GETS INTERESTING...

Why Nouri al-Maliki?

We are talking about the same politician who was Prime Minister during a period marked by serious corruption allegations, growing Iranian influence, and, most importantly, who helped establish the institutional framework that gave legal status to the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) in 2014.

So the question should not simply be:

“Is Maliki now against the militias?”

The real question is:

🇮🇶 WHO WILL CONTROL THE MILITIAS IF THEIR WEAPONS COME UNDER STATE CONTROL?

Because there is a huge difference between:

🇮🇶 STATE CONTROL
➡️ The Prime Minister and constitutional institutions genuinely control the weapons.

And:

🇮🇶 STATE COVER
➡️ Militias are formally integrated into the state while maintaining political influence, networks, and external relationships.

🔥 THIS IS THE KEY POINT

Maliki is not necessarily calling for the dissolution of the PMF.

The argument is more about bringing them under a state structure.

And that creates a very interesting possibility:

MILITIAS
⬇️
PMF
⬇️
STATE INSTITUTION
⬇️
POLITICAL INFLUENCE REMAINS

If that becomes the outcome, this would be less about dismantling the system and more about reorganizing it inside the Iraqi state.

🇮🇷 AND THIS IS WHERE IRAN ENTERS THE PICTURE

We cannot claim that Maliki is acting directly on orders from Iran.

But we also cannot ignore his long-standing political relationship with Tehran and his historical role in Iraq’s Iran-aligned political ecosystem.

That makes his involvement particularly interesting.

🇺🇸 Washington:
“We need weapons under state control.”

🇮🇶 Baghdad:
“We need Iraqi sovereignty.”

🇮🇷 Iran-aligned political networks:
“We need to make sure this transition does not destroy the existing power structure.”

And Maliki could potentially occupy the space between all three.

🎯 THE REAL QUESTION

Are we actually witnessing the creation of a genuine state monopoly on the use of force?

Or are we witnessing a process through which existing armed structures are legalized, institutionalized, and placed inside a new state framework while retaining much of their influence?

Because if the second scenario happens, the outcome could be:

Not: Eliminating militia influence.

But rather:

✅ Integrating them.
✅ Institutionalizing them.
✅ Keeping them inside the political system.
✅ Preserving their networks.
✅ Presenting the process as a victory for Iraqi sovereignty.

🔥 AND THIS IS WHY MALIKI MATTERS

The politician who helped create the architecture behind the PMF is now involved in the process that supposedly seeks to place weapons under state control.

That does not prove a conspiracy.

But it raises a very important question:

🇮🇶 Is Maliki helping Iraq establish genuine state control—or helping reshape the existing militia system so it can survive inside the Iraqi state?

👀 WATCH WHAT HAPPENS NEXT.

The real test will not be Maliki’s statements.

It will be whether this process actually removes:

🔴 Independent chains of command
🔴 Autonomous military decision-making
🔴 External influence
🔴 Independent financing
🔴 Political control by armed factions

If those things remain...

Then “state control” may simply become a new legal framework for an old power structure.

🇮🇶 Iraq’s sovereignty will ultimately be measured not by who signs the agreements, but by who actually controls the weapons.


🔗📢 FOLLOW & JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

#Iraq #Maliki #PMF #Iran #IraqPolitics #IraqiSovereignty #Baghdad #MiddleEast #StateControl #Geopolitics

🇮🇶 WHEN THE RV HAPPENS, WHAT RATE WILL THE DINAR OPEN AT? 💵👀🔥




🔗📢 FOLLOW & JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

🇮🇶🔥 IRAN, KURDISTAN & CONTROL OF IRAQ: IS A STRONG IRAQ THE REAL THREAT?

 KURDISTAN24

Syrian Tomorrow Current Says Iran Aims to Destabilize Kurdistan

----

🇮🇶🔥 IRAN, KURDISTAN & CONTROL OF IRAQ: IS A STRONG IRAQ THE REAL THREAT?

🇮🇷 NEWS: A new drone attack targeting facilities linked to Kurdistan Region Prime Minister Masrour Barzani has once again raised concerns about Iranian influence in Iraq. Kurdish authorities identified Iranian territory as the launch point.

⚠️ But this goes beyond Kurdistan.

If Iran destabilizes both Erbil and Baghdad, it puts pressure on two critical centers of Iraqi power. A weak, divided, corrupt Iraq with multiple centers of power is much easier to influence than a sovereign Iraq with strong institutions and state control over weapons.

💰 And this is where the economic dimension becomes critical:

An Iraq that reduces corruption, strengthens border and customs controls, modernizes its banking system, reduces the parallel economy, strengthens its institutions, attracts foreign investment, and diversifies beyond oil would have far greater independence from Tehran.

🇮🇶 A stronger Iraqi state means:

🔹 Less power for militias
🔹 Less parallel-market activity
🔹 Less external dependence
🔹 Greater control over dollar flows
🔹 Greater economic sovereignty
🔹 More foreign investment
🔹 Stronger integration with the Gulf and the West

🔥 And here is the strategic question:

Iran has incentives to preserve mechanisms of influence within a weak and fragmented Iraq. But the more pressure Iraq faces, the greater the incentive for Baghdad to build a truly sovereign state.

🇮🇶 The real battle may not be purely military.

It may be over the economic, financial, and political future of Iraq.

If Baghdad succeeds in reducing militia influence, fighting corruption, modernizing its financial system, and strengthening economic relations with the U.S. and Gulf countries, Iraq could begin transforming from a battleground between regional powers into a sovereign state capable of negotiating with everyone.

💥 A strong Iraq could fundamentally change the regional balance of power.



🔗📢 FOLLOW & JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

#Iraq 🇮🇶 #Iran 🇮🇷 #Kurdistan #Erbil #Baghdad #IraqSovereignty #IraqReforms #CBI #IraqiDinar #EconomicReform #DeDollarization #AntiCorruption #MiddleEast #Geopolitics #Iraq2026

🚨🇮🇶 Iraq’s “Next Phase” Reforms Could Strengthen the Dinar 💵📈#iqd #dinarnews

🔗📢  FOLLOW & JOIN OUR COMMUNITY 📌  TELEGRAM:   https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION 📌  X (TWITTER):   https://x.com/DinarWatchTeam 📌  BLUES...