CHANNEL8
Nouri al-Maliki and US Chargรฉ d'Affaires Joshua Harris have discussed efforts to place weapons under state control and strengthen Iraq’s constitutional institutions.
๐ฎ๐ถ MALIKI AND IRAQ’S WEAPONS: SOVEREIGNTY OR POLITICAL COVER?
NEWS SUMMARY
Nouri al-Maliki and U.S. Chargรฉ d’Affaires Joshua Harris discussed efforts to place weapons under state control and strengthen Iraq’s constitutional institutions.
Maliki is also involved in the Coordination Framework’s efforts to establish a mechanism to advance this process.
๐ฅ BUT HERE IS WHERE IT GETS INTERESTING...
Why Nouri al-Maliki?
We are talking about the same politician who was Prime Minister during a period marked by serious corruption allegations, growing Iranian influence, and, most importantly, who helped establish the institutional framework that gave legal status to the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) in 2014.
So the question should not simply be:
“Is Maliki now against the militias?”
The real question is:
๐ฎ๐ถ WHO WILL CONTROL THE MILITIAS IF THEIR WEAPONS COME UNDER STATE CONTROL?
Because there is a huge difference between:
๐ฎ๐ถ STATE CONTROL
➡️ The Prime Minister and constitutional institutions genuinely control the weapons.
And:
๐ฎ๐ถ STATE COVER
➡️ Militias are formally integrated into the state while maintaining political influence, networks, and external relationships.
๐ฅ THIS IS THE KEY POINT
Maliki is not necessarily calling for the dissolution of the PMF.
The argument is more about bringing them under a state structure.
And that creates a very interesting possibility:
MILITIAS
⬇️
PMF
⬇️
STATE INSTITUTION
⬇️
POLITICAL INFLUENCE REMAINS
If that becomes the outcome, this would be less about dismantling the system and more about reorganizing it inside the Iraqi state.
๐ฎ๐ท AND THIS IS WHERE IRAN ENTERS THE PICTURE
We cannot claim that Maliki is acting directly on orders from Iran.
But we also cannot ignore his long-standing political relationship with Tehran and his historical role in Iraq’s Iran-aligned political ecosystem.
That makes his involvement particularly interesting.
๐บ๐ธ Washington:
“We need weapons under state control.”
๐ฎ๐ถ Baghdad:
“We need Iraqi sovereignty.”
๐ฎ๐ท Iran-aligned political networks:
“We need to make sure this transition does not destroy the existing power structure.”
And Maliki could potentially occupy the space between all three.
๐ฏ THE REAL QUESTION
Are we actually witnessing the creation of a genuine state monopoly on the use of force?
Or are we witnessing a process through which existing armed structures are legalized, institutionalized, and placed inside a new state framework while retaining much of their influence?
Because if the second scenario happens, the outcome could be:
❌ Not: Eliminating militia influence.
But rather:
✅ Integrating them.
✅ Institutionalizing them.
✅ Keeping them inside the political system.
✅ Preserving their networks.
✅ Presenting the process as a victory for Iraqi sovereignty.
๐ฅ AND THIS IS WHY MALIKI MATTERS
The politician who helped create the architecture behind the PMF is now involved in the process that supposedly seeks to place weapons under state control.
That does not prove a conspiracy.
But it raises a very important question:
๐ฎ๐ถ Is Maliki helping Iraq establish genuine state control—or helping reshape the existing militia system so it can survive inside the Iraqi state?
๐ WATCH WHAT HAPPENS NEXT.
The real test will not be Maliki’s statements.
It will be whether this process actually removes:
๐ด Independent chains of command
๐ด Autonomous military decision-making
๐ด External influence
๐ด Independent financing
๐ด Political control by armed factions
If those things remain...
Then “state control” may simply become a new legal framework for an old power structure.
๐ฎ๐ถ Iraq’s sovereignty will ultimately be measured not by who signs the agreements, but by who actually controls the weapons.
๐ TELEGRAM: https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION
๐ X (TWITTER): https://x.com/DinarWatchTeam
๐ BLUESKY: https://bsky.app/profile/dinaresgurus.bsky.social
#Iraq #Maliki #PMF #Iran #IraqPolitics #IraqiSovereignty #Baghdad #MiddleEast #StateControl #Geopolitics