Friday, May 24, 2024
Finance reveals the value of non-oil revenues in the 2024 budget tables, 25 MAY
Finance reveals the value of non-oil revenues in the 2024 budget tables
"RV UPDATE" BY MILITIAMAN, 25 MAY
Militia Man
If they go on the Forex system it's going to be international. It's going to be fast and furious.
Could they do something within the county prior to that?
Sure, why not, educate the citizens, do what they got to do...
“The dollar is leaking”… Central Bank sales in numbers and an expert raises several questions, 25 MAY
“The dollar is leaking”… Central Bank sales in numbers and an expert raises several questions
"RV UPDATE" BY FRANK26, 25 MAY
Frank26
The problem is you don't see any of these contracts open do you?
...No, all of these contracts are sitting there waiting and waiting for what? For Sudani to pull the trigger. What is the trigger?
The lynchpin that will activate the contract and readjust the value according to the exchange rate of the Iraqi dinar, where the contract was signed in the Iraqi dinar value but to match their [contract holder's] currency. Brilliant... These signed guaranteed contracts will adjust to the calculation of the IQD value...These foreign currencies will not be calculated into the new exchange rate until the new Iraqi dinar exchange rate hits Forex...
A second set of books is a normal business action. Many companies, many firms for financial projections, for balances, for audit purposes, for changes whatever it may be, run a second set of books. The second set of books is simple business practice. It's not illegal unless you're doing it illegally under the table...This second set of books is not hidden...they [Iraq] expose it [their second second set of books] to the right people, IMF, World Bank, US Treasury...
Defense One urges Iraq and U.S. to forge long-term anti-terrorism agreement24 MAY
Defense One urges Iraq and U.S. to forge long-term anti-terrorism agreement
Shafaq News/ Iraq and the United States should reach a "smart and long-term" agreement to combat terrorism. The Defense One reported.
Christopher P. Costa, a member of The Soufan Center board of directors and an adjunct associate professor with Georgetown University’s Security Studies Program suggested in an article on the Dfence one that despite all the goodwill between Washington and Baghdad, future bilateral ties will likely be shaped by terrorism and Iranian-backed proxies.
“I’ve long been concerned that a pivot to great power competition could overcorrect U.S. attention and resources away from counterterrorism priorities, and indeed it has. Still, the rebalancing of U.S. national security focus can’t be binary; it is not an either-or proposition. We must focus on counterterrorism and on global competition, while leveraging allies as strategic partners. Fortunately, any setbacks in Iraq can be reversed by strengthening U.S. counterterrorism ties with Baghdad.” Costa said.
The writer indicated the principle of “strategic empathy” promoted by retired general and former White House national security advisor H.R. McMaster to show how the U.S.-Iraqi partnership can weather the difficulties of today’s competition.
“Iraq’s political and human terrain requires Prime Minister al-Sudani to navigate multifaceted security challenges and combustible internal pressures—exacerbated by Iranian proxies and their influence. The U.S., on the other hand, must view Baghdad diplomacy through a prism of Iraq’s political geography, particularly in the kind of high-stakes competition that is playing out across the Middle East.” He said.
“Leading up to his Washington engagements, Prime Minister al-Sudani lucidly expressed his understanding of the complexities of building a long-term sustainable partnership with the U.S. His region is beset by war, terrorism, proxies, and even sporadic hostage-taking. al-Sudani is keenly aware of the delicate balance Iraq must maintain between the U.S. and hostile armed groups, while at the same time seeking prosperity and security for the Iraqi people.”
Costa considered some pro-Iranian Shiite forces such as Kataib Hezbollah “may have stronger links to Iran than to Iraq. Knowing this, Washington and Baghdad have to carefully manage their strategic relationship for the long haul.”
“Accordingly, strategic investments in the U.S.-Iraqi counterterrorism partnership must continue despite any setbacks. Of the many undercurrents with Iraqi stability and security, it’s crucial not to overlook the Iraqi Counterterrorism Service, or CTS. Maintaining and continuing support to the CTS is crucial to the U.S.-Iraqi relationship. The CTS is an organization built and supported by the U.S. and must remain an enduring strategic partner. Still, Iraq will need to protect its counter-terrorism structure against undue Iranian meddling and interference.”
He pointed out that “all of the counterterrorism successes that Iraq and the U.S. have had in its fight against ISIS, the coalition arrayed against ISIS has not beat it decisively. Yet, both President Biden and Prime Minister al-Sudani recognize that Iraq must have U.S. support to ensure that ISIS can never again reconstitute to threaten Iraq, the international community, or the U.S.”
“Commentators were not entirely wrong to suggest that Iran's retaliatory strike against Israel overshadowed Iraqi Prime Minister al-Sudani's visit to Washington. The week-long visit this past April was supposed to focus on expanding bilateral ties, and new economic opportunities for investments, not an escalating regional war. But that’s the salutary point: Iraq’s importance, even if uncomfortably wedged in between warring states, has long term potential to bring much-needed stability to a region needing it.”
Costa added, “In light of all that is at play in Iraq, a bilateral strategic partnership is more important now than ever. That should be the take away from Prime Minister al-Sudani's visit to Washington. But more than anything else, terrorism and proxies will remain a spoiler for well-intended policy objectives. A vibrant counterterrorism partnership with the U.S. is the appropriate counterweight.”
“But the danger of escalation in Iraq remains. Just one day after al-Sudani returned from the U.S., Iraq’s Kataib Hezbollah said armed groups had decided to resume its attacks after noting little progress on talks held on U.S. troop presence during al-Sudani’s visit to Washington.”
He considered, in terms of hostage-taking and counterterrorism going forward, the United States and Iraq have three key considerations:
“First, Washington should signal its long-term commitment to Iraq by deepening its understanding of their complex security challenges and acknowledging the tensions between sovereignty and a continuing, mutually beneficial counterterrorism partnership with the United States.”
“Second, Baghdad can signal the strategic importance of CTS and ensure that the service is not politicized or infected by Iranian meddling. Along with this, Iraq’s security and intelligence services must create a security environment where no foreigners are kidnapped in Baghdad, and where hostage-takers are brought to justice.”
“Third, as Dr. Matthew Levitt presciently observed, maintaining a sound counterterrorism posture is the antithesis of “endless wars in terms of size, cost, and risk, and should be pursued in support of international coalitions and local allies.” With counterterrorism partnerships ending abruptly in places like Chad and Niger, Iraq must remain a U.S. priority.”
“To hedge, in counterterrorism, is to make smart investments for the future that reduces the risks of more instability and terrorism. A smart, appropriately scoped, long-term counterterrorism partnership in Iraq is therefore a bet worth making.” The article concluded.
"This Bank just told us about when they are going to move onto the QFS" BY GOLDILOCKS, 24 MAY
GOLDILOCKS
First action date: June 21, 2024 before 3:00 p.m. MT
Second action date: June 24, 2024 for the remaining steps.
Is important to note that this is one bank's timeline, but I can't help from notice that this one is before the June 30th, 2024 laws that are taking effect on crypto regulations and stablecoins at the end of the month.
© Goldilocks
China's Oil Gains in Iraq: Strategic Win or Potential Quagmire?, 24 MAY
China's Oil Gains in Iraq: Strategic Win or Potential Quagmire?
Shafaq News/ An international report warned that China is hastening to fill the power vacuum in Iraq by improving its energy security and global influence, suggesting that the results might be counterproductive even if Iraq is the primary beneficiary.
South China Morning Post said that Chinese firms recently won the lion’s share of licences for oil and gas exploration that Iraq solicited to wean its power plants off natural gas from Iran.
“The news demonstrates China’s drive to secure energy supplies as it struggles to reverse slowing growth at home. Beijing is seizing opportunities in the Middle East left by the West’s conflicting ambitions to deter foes and reassure allies. Wang Yi, China’s chief diplomat, has doubled down on the government’s pro-Palestinian stance.” The report said.
“Meanwhile, American and European companies are apprehensive about making long-term investments in war-ravaged countries with rampant corruption despite these nations’ lucrative reserves of gas and oil. They aren’t competing with China for oil contracts. Americans gave lives, time and money yet China is benefiting.”
However, China’s strategy in Iraq could prove to be a negative-sum game on many fronts – political, trade, influence, and more – given the power dynamics in the region.
“Many treacherous hazards confront statecraft, as the United States and Europe well know. China will face challenges in Iraq that are the result of antagonisms that have deepened over the past few centuries. The late US statesman Henry Kissinger wrote in 2014 that in the Middle East “political, sectarian, tribal, territorial, ideological, and traditional national interest disputes merge”.”
According to the report, today, the war in Gaza promises an impossible outcome. Throughout the Middle East, terrorism erupts in societies roiled by deep-seated religious tensions that unstable governments cannot defuse. Gulf countries are rising in power and ambition as they assert their independence.
“China isn’t absolved from these difficulties by stressing neutrality and dialogue facilitation while keeping its distance from local groups. It succeeds in Iraq because it doesn’t get bogged down in internal politics. Can China continue to prosper if it doesn’t take sides with local actors?”
“History shows repeatedly that geostrategic power vacuums are like black holes. Countries leverage various means – often economic incentives – to gain influence when rivals partially retrench or collapse, but not always. Sometimes remaining on the sidelines is a better strategy.” The report pointed out.
US President Joe Biden made note of China’s growing Middle East presence in 2022 while visiting Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. “We will not walk away and leave a vacuum to be filled by China, Russia or Iran,” Biden said. “And we’ll seek to build on this moment with active, principled American leadership.”
Estimates of US troops stationed in the Middle East go up to more than 50,000, with Qatar hosting the largest US base. There was unprecedented security cooperation between Washington, Tel Aviv, Riyadh and Abu Dhabi after Iran targeted Israel with missile and drone attacks last month. In comparison, China’s foothold in the region is not as strong.
China and Iraq last year marked 65 years of bilateral relations which began after Iraq’s coup of 1958, when General Abdul Karim Qasim deposed the Hashemite monarchy and Beijing recognized his “revolutionary” government. Throughout Iraq’s war with Iran in the 1980s, China sold weapons to both sides.
“Even with those efforts, China’s relations with Iraq were limited until the last two decades. Alongside Beijing’s growing need for oil, factors such as Iraq’s need for liquidity, reconstruction following years of conflict, the effects of low oil prices and “rightsizing” of US forces in Iraq pushed the two closer together.”
The report listed that the recent milestones in their relationship are many. A 2009 agreement gave China National Petroleum Corporation a 37 per cent stake in the Rumaila oilfield, Iraq’s largest. By 2013, China had a hand in more than half of Iraq’s daily oil output. In 2010, the Chinese government cancelled 80 per cent of debt Iraq owed Beijing. Videos in 2015 showed the Iraqi military operating Chinese supplied CH-4 drones.
Iraq and China signed an oil-for-reconstruction deal in 2019, with Beijing funding infrastructure projects in exchange for 100,000 barrels per day. As of February, Chinese firms oversee two-thirds of Iraq’s oil production. Meanwhile, Iraq was the top target for Belt and Road Initiative financing in 2021, receiving US$10.5 billion for infrastructure projects. Last year, Iraq’s central bank announced it would settle trade with China directly in yuan, though the oil trade was excluded.
Entanglements like these inevitably become labyrinthine, with the objectives lost and unravelling increasingly difficult. Like machines with many moving parts, maintenance and repairs are needed more frequently and pose greater difficulty. Add to that the complications from uncertainties, volatility and unforeseen events, such as Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi dying in a helicopter crash.
“All this leaves China with a difficult balancing act: it must mind its partners’ interests and distance itself from local actors, while keeping an eye on mounting economic vulnerabilities at home. Beijing could find itself elbowed out of Iraq as Gulf countries – especially Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates – provide huge investments in an effort to amass regional power, ensure stability and isolate Iran.” The report concluded.
Some of these same Gulf countries are signing deals with China as part of the Belt and Road Initiative, yet their ambitions will limit Beijing’s room to act unilaterally. Regional instability, such as the Houthi attacks on vessels in the Red Sea, also raises the prospect of China needing cooperation with the US, Europe and Gulf countries to secure the flow of oil and gas while protecting its investments. That adds complications to fierce tensions with the West over trade.
Much like the West now, China will find itself increasingly seeing progress swept away by centuries-old hostilities. Beijing might have taken on more than it can manage.
On a visit that lasted for hours. The presidency of the region reveals the talks of Barzani and Bin Zayed, 24 MAY
The President of the Kurdistan Region, Nechirvan Barzani, met this Friday evening in Abu Dhabi, with the President of the United Arab Emirates, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.
According to the Presidency of the Kurdistan Region, the two sides discussed the UAE’s relations with Iraq and the Kurdistan region, and exchanged views on the situation of Iraq and the Kurdistan region, as well as the relations of Erbil-Baghdad, as well as on the latest developments in the region.
The two sides stressed strengthening relations in the economic and trade fields and cooperation in the field of energy, and talked about opportunities and fields of investment and employment of UAE money in Iraq and the Kurdistan region, especially in the field of infrastructure and development projects.
With regard to the situation and results of the Middle East, the two parties agreed in the view of the importance of joint action, cooperation and multilateral international solidarity in order to maintain security and stability and reduce the expansion and spread of further problems.
The relations of Erbil and Baghdad with neighboring countries and with the region, climate change and its consequences, and a number of issues of common concern, formed another aspect of the meeting.
The President of the Kurdistan Region arrived on Friday afternoon to the UAE on an official visit, during which he discussed with Emirati officials strengthening bilateral relations between the two sides.
Barzani concluded his visit to Abu Dhabi, which lasted for hours to return to the region.
https://alforatnews.iq/news/في-زيارة-استمرت-لساعات-رئاسة-الإقليم-تكشف-مباحثات-بارزاني-وبن-زايد
Parliamentary Finance is confused by the large difference between the 2023 and 2024 budgets... and warns against stopping provincial projects, MAY 24
Parliamentary Finance is confused by the large difference between the 2023 and 2024 budgets... and warns against stopping provincial projects
Member of the Parliamentary Finance Committee, Mustafa Al-Karawi, revealed today, Thursday (May 23, 2024), that service and urban projects, some of which are ministerial, have been halted due to the reduction in governorate allocations in the financial budget tables for the year 2024.
The Council of Ministers voted in an extraordinary session last Sunday on the budget schedules and referred them to the House of Representatives, which received them the day before yesterday, Tuesday.
Al-Karaawi said in a televised statement, followed by “Baghdad Today,” “We noticed in the budget tables that there was a reduction in allocations to the governorates, some of which reached 80% compared to what was allocated to them in last year’s budget, and this may cause projects to stop and not lead to covering their expenses and contractors’ dues, and this may be what may happen.” "It causes a problem and a gap in the issue of financing."
He stressed, "Projects, including ministerial ones, have been halted due to lack of funding," pointing out that "there is a turbulent indicator between the 2024 budget and last year in terms of project financing, and we will host the Ministers of Finance and Planning next week."
Al-Karaawi pointed out, “Preparing a list of clarifications and sending them to the Ministry of Finance about the reasons for the increase in expenditures, the mechanism for collecting oil and non-oil revenues, and the inflation of the financial deficit in the budget.”
He added, "The government has committed itself to collecting 27 trillion dinars in non-oil revenues during the year 2024, and we requested clarification from the Ministry of Finance about the mechanism for achieving this goal," noting that "there is an increase in the operating budget that reached 156 trillion dinars."
The parliamentary finance member expected that “the maximum time limit for approving the budget schedules will be before the end of the current legislative term on next June 9, so there will be an intensive program for the Finance Committee to discuss these schedules and find solutions to the problems in them.”
It is noteworthy that Prime Minister Muhammad Shiaa Al-Sudani revealed in a press conference following the cabinet session last Sunday the details of the budget schedules and said in the most prominent contents:
- Table (A) includes revenues totaling (144.336) trillion dinars, and Table (B) concerns total planned expenditures totaling (210.936) trillion dinars.
- The planned budget deficit amounted to (63.599) trillion dinars, and Table (C) is the centrally funded workforce table, amounting to (4,079,906) employees, and governing expenditures amounted to (10.042) trillion dinars.
- The investment budget for 2024 is (54.298) trillion dinars, and may reach 55 trillion dinars.
- Governorate allocations to local government programs with an investment allocation amounted to (10.633) trillion dinars in 2023, and we financed (3.333) trillion, based on fundamental requests from the governorates.
- The remainder of the allocation (7.333) trillion dinars is in a trust account, at the disposal of the provincial governments.
- Allocating approximately (8) trillion dinars to ongoing projects, including allocations in 2024.
- For the first time in the history of budgets, we exceeded spending by 50%.
The increase in debt repayment amounted to 3.9 trillion dinars. In 2023, the debt repayment was 12,751, and in 2024, we repaid 16.725 trillion. link
"Why are all these bank CEO’s resigning? BY MIKECRISTO, 24 MAY
MIKECRISTO
Why are all these bank CEO’s resigning?
Because China (and the rest of BRICS+, and those wanting to join) are selling dollars.
The East no longer wants to export their precious commodities to the West and take dollar credit as a form of payment.
If the U.S. can’t export dollar credit then treasury bonds collapse.
What funds the stock market? U.S. Treasury bonds.
Gold is rising because the world (China) is selling dollars.
Minister Of Electricity: We Are Working To Support The Private Sector By Establishing National Production Lines, 24 MAY
Minister Of Electricity: We Are Working To Support The Private Sector By Establishing National Production Lines
Minister of Electricity Ziad Ali Fadel energy Economy News – Baghdad The Minister of Electricity, Ziad Ali Fadel, confirmed on Thursday that the ministry is working to support the private sector in the country by establishing national production lines.
The media office of the Minister of Electricity said in a statement, seen by Al-Eqtisad News, that “the Minister met with a delegation from the Riyadh Cable Company and a coalition of Al-Rowad companies for the production of electrical wires and cables.”
The Minister of Electricity confirmed, according to the statement, that “we have an intention to support the private sector and stimulate the industrial movement in the country by establishing national production lines that attract labor and contribute to meeting the electricity sector’s need for spare parts.”
He added: “We need to produce wires and cables (11, 33, and 132 kV) to keep up with demand and address bottlenecks.”
He pointed out that "there are controls for laboratory and factory tests conducted by the Ministry to proceed with competitive transactions in accordance with the approved specifications."
The Minister of Electricity continued, "Private sector companies have successful experiences with the ministry's formations, and we hope to strengthen them and develop production facilities in a way that serves and achieves the public interest."
Views 75 05/23/2024 - https://economy-news.net/content.php?id=43682
"RV UPDATE" BY BEARDED PATRIOT, 24 MAY
BEARDED PATRIOT
Family:
With all things considered, our revaluation could extend to early June, but the point is, it's suspicious for the reasons stated in this widely distributed all of a sudden mysterious source. There is legitimate Intel from literally the horses mouth that June was a best Target month of Dr. Shabibi. The question is why?
Because Dr Shabibi said " the "project to delete the zeros with the rate change should be done at the beginning or middle of Iraqs fiscal year" FOR ACCOUNTING purposes!
That being said, June 2024 is the end of the 2nd quarter of Iraqs financial accounting ledger.
Hang in there everyone, the “END”of this financial saga will soon be at hand, IMO.
BP