Friday, February 6, 2026
The US State Department told Shafaq News: We will use all our tools to prevent Maliki's return.
The US State Department told Shafaq News: We will use all our tools to prevent Maliki's return.
The US State Department revealed on Thursday evening a firm and strongly worded position regarding the upcoming political alliances map in Iraq, stressing that the US administration is prepared to use "a full range of tools" to ensure the implementation of President Donald Trump's vision regarding the Iraqi issue.
In a special and exclusive response to Shafaq News Agency, the US State Department spokesperson conveyed a direct warning against repeating past governance scenarios, indicating that current US policy requires an Iraqi government capable of working "effectively and respectfully" with the United States.
The State Department spokesman also relayed President Trump's warning, which read: "The last time Maliki was in power, the country slid into poverty and chaos... That should not be allowed to happen again."
The American response continued, quoting Trump, that the policies and ideologies he described as "crazy" would lead, if Maliki were re-elected, to a complete cutoff of American aid, warning that "if the United States is not there to help, Iraq will have no chance of success, prosperity, or freedom."
The State Department spokesman concluded by saying, "We have clearly communicated these intentions to the Iraqi political leadership," stressing that Washington is prepared to use "the full range of tools" to enforce this policy and prevent a repeat of governance experiences that harm common interests. LINK
DINAR REVALUATION NEWS ANALYSIS: Pressure, Power, and Oil: Washington’s Escalating Clash with Iraq
Introduction: A Strategic Clash in Baghdad
Recent reports from Tehran Times and Bloomberg highlight a growing confrontation between Iraq and the United States—not on the battlefield, but in political and economic arenas.
This is not a minor disagreement. Analysts describe it as a strategic showdown over Iraq’s sovereignty, decision-making independence, and control of its resources.
The real question: Will Iraq assert its autonomy—or succumb to external pressures?
U.S. Pressure on Iraq Over Prime Minister Selection
Headline Takeaway:
Washington tightens the political noose.
The Tehran Times frames current events as the beginning of a deeper U.S.–Iraq confrontation. Key points include:
Diplomatic and political pressure: The U.S. is clearly signaling opposition to certain prime minister candidates.
Foreign influence concerns: Iraq’s internal political process is under scrutiny, raising questions about sovereignty.
Strategic positioning: Washington aims to shape Iraq’s leadership and ensure alignment with U.S. interests in the region.
This situation places Iraq in a delicate position—forced to choose between independence and compliance.
Economic Leverage: Oil Revenues as a Political Tool
Headline Takeaway:
Oil revenues become Washington’s leverage.
According to Bloomberg:
The U.S. has warned Iraq that oil revenue could be reduced if Nouri al-Maliki assumes the premiership.
Economic pressure is used strategically to influence political outcomes.
These actions could deeply impact Iraq’s economy and further strain relations with Washington.
Oil is Iraq’s lifeblood, representing the largest source of government revenue. Any threat to this sector is effectively a high-stakes bargaining chip.
Why This Matters
Sovereignty at stake: Iraq must navigate between foreign pressure and internal political demands.
Economic vulnerability: Dependence on oil revenue makes Iraq sensitive to external threats.
Regional implications: A Maliki premiership opposed by Washington could influence broader Middle East dynamics.
Political signaling: U.S. pressure is a warning to other countries about consequences of diverging from U.S. interests.
Featured Snippet: Key Insight
Iraq faces rising U.S. political and economic pressure over its prime minister selection. Washington has used diplomatic influence and threatened oil revenue reductions to sway Baghdad’s decisions, raising serious questions about Iraq’s sovereignty.
Q&A: Understanding the Stakes
Q: Is this a military conflict?
A: No, the confrontation is strategic and political, centered on sovereignty, foreign influence, and economic leverage.
Q: Why is Maliki a focal point?
A: His potential return as prime minister is opposed by Washington, which sees him as unfavorable to U.S. regional interests.
Q: How does oil factor in?
A: Iraq’s oil revenue is its largest economic resource. Threats to reduce it serve as a powerful economic tool in negotiations.
Q: What does this mean for Iraq’s sovereignty?
A: Iraq faces pressure to balance domestic decision-making with external influence—a defining test for the country’s autonomy.
Analysis: Strategic Chess in Baghdad
This clash is more chess than conflict:
Washington leverages diplomatic signals, economic warnings, and oil dependence.
Iraq must navigate internal politics, regional interests, and global economic realities.
The outcome could set a precedent for how sovereign nations interact with superpowers under high-pressure conditions.
Final Thoughts: Watching the Battle Unfold
The escalating U.S.–Iraq confrontation is a critical moment for Baghdad.
Political choices now are inseparable from economic consequences. The world should watch closely: the balance of power in Iraq, control of resources, and regional stability are all at stake.
Stay Connected & Follow the Analysis
🔹 Official Blog:
https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/
🔹 Telegram Channel:
https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION
🔹 Facebook Page:
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064023274131
🔹 Twitter / X:
https://x.com/DinaresGurus
🔹 YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/@DINARREVALUATION
🔹 Sources:
Tehran Times
Bloomberg
Hashtags
#IraqPolitics #USPressure #Maliki #Baghdad #IraqSovereignty
#OilLeverage #MiddleEastPolitics #EconomicPressure #RVWatch #GlobalReset
Pressure, Power, and Oil: How Washington Is Escalating Its Clash with Iraq”
TEHRAN TIMES
Headline takeaway: Iraq’s real battle with the United States is just beginning.
Summary:
Tehran Times frames the current moment as the start of a deeper and more direct confrontation between Iraq and the U.S.
The conflict is portrayed as strategic rather than military, centered on political independence, foreign influence, and control over decision-making in Baghdad.
The narrative suggests Iraq is being pushed to choose between asserting sovereignty or yielding to external pressure.
U.S. Pressure on Iraq Over Prime Minister Post
Headline takeaway: Washington tightens the political noose.
Summary:
The United States is increasing diplomatic and political pressure on Iraq regarding the selection of its prime minister.
Signals from Washington indicate clear opposition to certain candidates, raising concerns about foreign interference in Iraq’s internal affairs.
This pressure is seen as part of a broader effort to shape Iraq’s political future in line with U.S. interests.
BLOOMBERG
Headline takeaway: Oil revenues become Washington’s leverage.
Summary:
Bloomberg reports that the U.S. has warned Baghdad of potential reductions in oil revenues if Nouri al-Maliki returns to the premiership.
The threat highlights the use of economic and financial tools as leverage in political negotiations.
Such measures could have serious consequences for Iraq’s economy and deepen tensions between Baghdad and Washington.
BAGHDAD INTERNATIONAL FAIR: AN EFFECTIVE PLATFORM FOR CONNECTING IRAQ TO GLOBAL MARKETS
BAGHDAD INTERNATIONAL FAIR: AN EFFECTIVE PLATFORM FOR CONNECTING IRAQ TO GLOBAL MARKETS
The Baghdad International Fair train has reached the middle of its stations, amidst a wide interaction from Iraqi and international participants, reflecting the importance of this economic event and the real opportunities it holds for cooperation and partnership.
Over the past few days, the exhibition halls have witnessed remarkable activity, including direct meetings and exchanges of experiences between participating companies and delegations, reflecting a shared desire to build mutually beneficial economic relations.
The exhibition continues to play its role as an effective platform for linking the Iraqi market with its regional and international counterparts, and opening new horizons for partnerships that contribute to supporting the national economy and achieving sustainable development.
On its fourth day, the exhibition began its activities by organizing the Iraqi-Bulgarian Forum, which aims to enhance economic cooperation between the two friendly countries.
Iraq’s growing importance
For his part, the representative of the Iraqi Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Dr. Abdul Salam Saddam, considered the forum to be a reflection of the growing importance of Iraq on the global stage, and an affirmation of its position as an important link in its regional and international environment.
Sandy Ingram Warns: Maliki, Trump, and the Dollar Risk to Iraq’s Development Road
Introduction: A Concerning Political and Monetary Signal
Recent commentary from Sandy Ingram highlights growing concerns on two critical fronts:
The continued push to install Nouri al-Maliki as Iraq’s Prime Minister
The potential monetary misstep of pricing Iraq’s Development Road Project services in U.S. dollars instead of Iraqi dinars
Both issues carry serious consequences—not only politically, but economically and monetarily for Iraq’s future.
Maliki, Trump, and Political Miscalculation
Sandy Ingram did not mince words when expressing concern over the apparent effort to force Maliki back into power.
Her warning centers on one key factor: Donald Trump.
“President Trump says things and then changes his mind. He plays chess. He plays politics like mega business.”
This matters because Trump has historically shown zero tolerance for perceived disrespect, especially from foreign governments attempting to bypass U.S. pressure or influence outcomes against American interests.
If Maliki were to return as Prime Minister, it would likely be interpreted by Trump not as coincidence—but as direct defiance.
That is a dangerous gamble.
Why This Matters for Iraq
Iraq is at a fragile crossroads:
Political legitimacy is still forming
Economic reforms are incomplete
Currency reform remains unfinished
Installing a controversial figure like Maliki could:
Trigger renewed U.S. pressure
Jeopardize international confidence
Delay or derail economic normalization
Sandy’s concern is not emotional—it is strategic.
The Development Road Project: A Dollar Trap?
While traveling through Northern Africa, Sandy posed a question that caused immediate alarm:
What if Iraq charges Development Road Project clients in U.S. dollars?
Her reaction was telling:
“My heart dropped.”
Why?
Because yes—technically, Iraq could do that.
Iraq already sells oil in U.S. dollars. From a logistical standpoint, it would not be unreasonable for policymakers to consider pricing transportation, logistics, and transit hub services in dollars as well.
But from a currency reform standpoint, this would be devastating.
Why Dollar Pricing Hurts the Iraqi Dinar
If Iraq were to monetize its most ambitious infrastructure project in USD:
Demand for the IQD remains suppressed
Domestic currency strength is delayed
Revaluation or appreciation becomes harder—not easier
Sandy explains it clearly:
“It doesn’t do anything for their currency—the Iraqi dinar.”
For Iraq to benefit internally, the dinar must:
Move up at least two decimal points
Ideally rise several decimal points to create meaningful purchasing power and profit realization
Dollarization postpones that outcome.
Featured Snippet: Core Insight
Pricing Iraq’s Development Road Project in U.S. dollars would undermine demand for the Iraqi dinar and delay the currency’s necessary appreciation.
Q&A: Key Questions Answered
Q: Can Iraq legally charge for services in U.S. dollars?
A: Yes. Iraq already sells oil in USD, so it is feasible—but not ideal for currency reform.
Q: Why is this bad for the IQD?
A: It removes demand pressure from the dinar, preventing appreciation.
Q: How much does the IQD need to move to matter?
A: Sandy suggests multiple decimal points for meaningful profit realization.
Q: Why is Trump relevant here?
A: Trump views political defiance personally and strategically. A Maliki return could provoke swift retaliation.
The Bigger Picture: Chess, Not Checkers
Sandy Ingram’s commentary reminds us of something crucial:
This is not checkers.
This is chess.
Political appointments affect currency policy.
Currency policy affects sovereignty.
Sovereignty determines Iraq’s future.
Every move matters.
Final Thoughts: Concern Is Justified
Sandy summed it up best:
She is overtly concerned.
Concerned about:
Political disrespect toward U.S. leadership
Miscalculations involving Trump
Dollar dependency undermining the dinar
Lost opportunity for real currency reform
These are not hypothetical risks—they are real-world consequences.
Stay Connected & Follow the Ongoing Analysis
🔹 Official Blog:
https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/
🔹 Telegram Channel:
https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION
🔹 Facebook Page:
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064023274131
🔹 Twitter / X:
https://x.com/DinaresGurus
🔹 YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/@DINARREVALUATION
🔹 Source Reference:
Sandy Ingram Commentary
Hashtags
#SandyIngram #IraqiDinar #IQD #IraqEconomy
#DevelopmentRoad #CurrencyReform #Maliki
#TrumpStrategy #Dedollarization #GlobalReset
Sandy Ingram
It seems they are really trying to push Maliki into this PM position. I really am concerned for them pushing President Trump, he says things and then changes his mind. He plays chess. He plays politics like he plays mega business. I don't think they've ever seen him respond to blatant disrespect, which it would be if Maliki becomes the prime minister of Iraq. So I don't mind telling you, I'm overtly concerned.
As I was traveling [To Northern Africa] I thought to myself, what if Iraq charges its [Development Road Project] clients in US dollars? And my heart dropped...Can they do that? Will they do that?
I don't know. I've got to...find out if that's even feasible. They sell oil in US dollars, why would they not possibly at least research the idea of selling the transportation hub services in US dollars...? It doesn't do anything for their currency the Iraqi dinar but the Iraqi dinar would need to come up. It would need to move over at least two decimal points...We need the IQD to move over several decimal points in order to realize some sort of profit.
A LEADER IN THE HIKMA MOVEMENT: MALIKI WILL WITHDRAW AND THE COORDINATION FRAMEWORK WILL REVERT TO THE ORIGINAL SIX NAMES
A LEADER IN THE HIKMA MOVEMENT: MALIKI WILL WITHDRAW AND THE COORDINATION FRAMEWORK WILL REVERT TO THE ORIGINAL SIX NAMES.
Fahd Al-Jubouri, a leader in the National Wisdom Movement, said in a televised interview:
The lack of Kurdish consensus on the presidency is not new.
The coordination framework did not obstruct the presidential election
. This week will be crucial in selecting candidates for both presidencies
. New scenarios regarding al-Maliki’s nomination will be presented and announced tomorrow
. The next government should not be headed by a controversial figure, both domestically and internationally
. Current circumstances are completely unfavorable for al-Maliki’s nomination as prime minister.
We do not expect al-Maliki to form a government
. The religious authority’s stance is part of the political forces’ reservations about al-Maliki
. Why didn’t the majority that nominated al-Maliki attend parliament?
Al-Maliki will withdraw, and the coordination framework will revert to the original six names.
Badr Organization leader Mu’in al-Kadhimi stated in a televised interview:
“There is internal acceptance for the continued nomination of Maliki for Prime Minister
. Maliki is capable of monopolizing weapons in the hands of the state
. Withdrawing support for Maliki will give Trump the opportunity to expand his influence and will lead to further problems.”
MarkZ Update: Historic Bonds, Final Codes, and Why Iraq and Vietnam Must Go Together
Introduction: Quiet Movements Behind the Scenes
Sometimes the most important developments happen quietly, away from public headlines.
According to MarkZ, there have been significant movements involving Historic Bonds, U.S. Treasury participation, and final procedural steps that suggest something major may be approaching. While caution is still advised, the information coming from high-level sources paints a picture that is difficult to ignore.
MarkZ himself remains careful not to overhype—but even with restraint, the signals are strong.
Historic Bonds: Why This Matters
MarkZ shared that he has been hesitant to fully disclose certain details regarding Historic Bonds, primarily because of how sensitive this phase appears to be.
What we know so far:
Some bond deals have been completed
The U.S. Treasury (UST) is directly involved as a purchaser
All documentation appears finalized (“I’s dotted, T’s crossed”)
The process is now awaiting a final code release
This is critical because Historic Bonds have always been considered the “canary in the coal mine”—when they move, broader financial mechanisms often follow.
Money Is Already Moving
Perhaps the most compelling part of this update is that money movement is already being observed.
Not rumors.
Not expectations.
Actual movement.
MarkZ notes that individuals deeply involved in the process—at the paymaster level or higher—are seeing activity. Historically, this phase occurs right before public-facing financial events.
Still, MarkZ emphasizes caution:
“I don’t want to get people’s hopes up too much… stay grounded.”
But he also adds:
“It really looks that good.”
Key Insight: Bonds First, Then Us
One of MarkZ’s most consistent statements over the years has been this:
When the bonds go, we should be next.
This sequence has repeated itself across multiple financial restructurings and global settlement processes. Bonds represent trust and liquidity restoration, which must occur before currencies and exchanges can reset.
Reader Question: Why Not Vietnam First?
Question:
If Iraq appears to be postponed for now, why couldn’t Vietnam just RV on its own?
This is a logical and frequently asked question.
MarkZ’s Answer: They Are Intertwined
MarkZ’s response was clear and direct:
“They will go at the same time… they are intertwined.”
According to MarkZ, separating Iraq and Vietnam in the RV process would severely damage their treasuries. The currencies are structured in such a way that simultaneous movement is required to maintain financial balance.
Even more notable:
This information came from a contact working inside Iraq’s Finance Ministry.
That detail adds significant weight to the explanation.
Why Simultaneous RVs Matter
Here’s why going together matters:
Treasury reserves are structured jointly
Liquidity balancing requires synchronized adjustment
Isolated RVs create destabilizing arbitrage
Global settlement mechanisms are batch-based, not individual
In short:
One cannot safely move without the other.
Featured Snippet: Key Takeaway
According to MarkZ, Iraq and Vietnam currency revaluations must occur simultaneously because separating them would destabilize national treasuries and disrupt global financial balance.
Q&A: Breaking It Down
Q: Are Historic Bonds officially released yet?
A: Not publicly. According to MarkZ, they are awaiting a final code release, which typically precedes payouts.
Q: Is the U.S. Treasury really involved?
A: MarkZ states that UST is acting as a purchaser in certain bond transactions.
Q: Does money movement mean RV is imminent?
A: Historically, yes—but timing remains uncertain. This phase suggests advanced readiness.
Q: Can Vietnam RV without Iraq?
A: No. MarkZ confirms they are financially intertwined and must move together.
Why Staying Grounded Matters
MarkZ’s tone remains consistent:
Optimistic, but cautious
Encouraging, but realistic
Hopeful, but grounded
This balance is essential. Overexcitement leads to disappointment. Understanding the process helps maintain clarity.
Final Thoughts: Watching the Right Signals
The key signals to watch are not headlines or hype—but:
Bond movement
Treasury-level participation
Paymaster activity
Final code releases
These are structural indicators, not speculation.
If MarkZ is right—and history suggests he often is—then what follows the bonds could change everything.
Stay Connected & Follow Ongoing Updates
🔹 Official Blog:
https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/
🔹 Telegram Channel:
https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION
🔹 Facebook Page:
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064023274131
🔹 Twitter / X:
https://x.com/DinaresGurus
🔹 YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/@DINARREVALUATION
🔹 Source Reference:
MarkZ Commentary (compiled)
Hashtags
#MarkZ #HistoricBonds #RVUpdate #IraqDinar #VietnamDong
#GlobalReset #BondMarket #USTreasury #FinancialReset #StayGrounded
MarkZ
There have been some interesting things on Historic Bonds that I have been somewhat hesitant to share...Some of the deals that have been worked out through UST (US Treasury) as the purchasers…. I am told they have finished up with their I’s dotted and crossed their t’s and are waiting for the final code release...we are seeing money movement by people very involved in the process. (At the paymaster level or higher) I don’t want to get people hopes up too much…so stay grounded. But it really looks that good. [MarkZ always says that when the bonds go we should be next.]
Question: So with Iraq being seemingly postponed for now - Why couldn’t Vietnam just RV now?
MarkZ: They will go at the same time…they are intertwined and it would crush their treasuries to go separately …that is how it was told to me by someone who works in the Finance Ministry in Iraq.
THE END OF THE “LONG STRUGGLE”… MALIKI IS CLOSE TO ANNOUNCING HIS WITHDRAWAL EXPECTATIONS ARE THAT A NEW SESSION TO ELECT THE “PRESIDENT” WILL BE HELD EARLY NEXT WEEK
THE END OF THE “LONG STRUGGLE”… MALIKI IS CLOSE TO ANNOUNCING HIS WITHDRAWAL EXPECTATIONS ARE THAT A NEW SESSION TO ELECT THE “PRESIDENT” WILL BE HELD EARLY NEXT WEEK.
(This announcement is what Kurdistan was waiting for in order to announce their nominee for the presidency. Picking the new president was not the crisis it was a coverup while they sorted out this Nori al-Maliki nominee mess. Understand? Now that he has conceded his nomination and back off the new president is announced to us. Thus they can now move ahead with the election process again. )
Speculation is mounting in political circles that Nouri al-Maliki, leader of the State of Law Coalition, may announce his withdrawal from the prime ministerial race within the next few hours or days, a scenario reminiscent of 2014.
These expectations come at a time of continued political deadlock, with Parliament failing for the second time in two weeks to convene a session to elect a president—a constitutional step that should pave the way for the nomination of the candidate from the largest bloc to form the new government.
According to multiple sources, the reason for the stalled sessions is not so much procedural disagreements, as officially stated, but rather al-Maliki’s own nomination. He faces objections primarily from Shia political forces, in addition to a warning from the United States that it will halt aid to Iraq if his nomination is approved. This has placed the political process in a complex internal and external predicament.
Meanwhile, the pro-government camp, which visited the Kurdistan Region last Monday, does not appear to have emerged with clear support for al-Maliki’s candidacy. It seems they have thus gathered a range of internal and external opinions regarding their nominee.
The five key players in the government crisis,
according to a Shiite politician close to the negotiations, who spoke to Al-Mada, are likely to see Maliki’s room for maneuver shrinking, leaving him with no option but to withdraw quietly. The politician, who requested anonymity, indicated that Maliki and his pro-government camp had listened to the positions of all parties, both internal and external, regarding a candidate who “does not seem acceptable.”
He added that the “Coordination Framework” team supporting Maliki received no positive signals from his recent visit to Kurdistan, and had previously failed to gauge the opinion of the Najaf religious establishment, which refused to intervene.
Meanwhile, Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s stance on Maliki was interpreted in various ways. The Shiite opposition saw his position as lacking any explicit endorsement or support.
Furthermore, the pro-government camp received signals of rejection from approximately half of the Sunni political forces, while US President Donald Trump’s position was the most explicit, describing Maliki as a “bad” choice who would reignite sectarian tensions in Iraq.
The “withdrawal scenario” is expected by politicians, who anticipate a repeat of the 2014 scenario, with Maliki appearing to announce his resignation after prolonged attempts to remain in power. He leveraged his well-known “patience” and pushed his supporters toward escalation before decisive messages arrived from the religious establishment rejecting his continued rule.
A group of Shiite forces believes that the religious establishment’s stance against Maliki remains unchanged “unless something contradicts it,” which encourages Ammar al-Hakim, leader of the “Hikma Movement,” and Qais al-Khazali, leader of “Asa’ib Ahl al-Haq,” to continue rejecting his candidacy.In this context, Hussam al-Hassani, spokesman for the “Hikma Movement,” endorsed the predictions regarding Maliki’s withdrawal, stating in a television interview: “I expect Maliki to withdraw, and this stance is not unusual for him,” adding that “the coordinating framework has no decision to confront the United States.”
Hakim and Khazali had previously posted a photo of themselves together during the “pro-government” camp’s trip to Kurdistan, a scene interpreted as a declaration of alignment within the “opposition” camp. A statement issued by al-Khazali’s office indicated that “the meeting addressed the importance of respecting constitutional timelines in the government formation process, expediting the selection of the president, and discussing the political situation and the positions of national forces to ensure consensus and stability in the national landscape.”
MNT GOAT: Really? Is Maliki in Any Position to Set Conditions? The Final Political Miscalculation
Introduction: Really… Conditions?
Really?
Is Nouri al-Maliki actually in a position to place conditions on anyone—let alone the United States?
What we are witnessing now is not strength. It is political theater, an attempt to save face while quietly retreating from a nomination that has already collapsed.
Maliki wants the public to believe he is standing up to the U.S.
In reality, he has no leverage, no support, and no future path forward.
The Face-Saving Strategy: Blame Everyone Else
In a recent interview monitored by Roj News, Maliki stated:
“I am an Iraqi citizen, and my nomination came from an Iraqi institution, the Coordination Framework. Therefore, I cannot withdraw based on the request of a foreign country.”
Sounds bold—until you compare it with his previous statements, where he openly suggested he would withdraw under “certain conditions.”
So which is it?
This contradiction exposes the truth:
Maliki is backing down—but he refuses to admit why.
It’s Always Trump’s Fault… Right?
Now comes the predictable pivot.
Maliki claims that:
President Trump was “misled”
Three countries and domestic parties influenced opposition
The infamous tweet may not have even come from Trump himself
Let’s be real.
Trump does not need to be “misled” about Maliki.
He remembers exactly what Iraq looked like from 2006–2014.
That era speaks for itself.
This was not foreign manipulation.
This was accountability.
The Real Reason Maliki Is Backing Out
Here’s the key admission Maliki can’t escape:
“My candidacy would not expose Iraq to U.S. economic sanctions.”
Why even say this—unless sanctions are a very real threat?
He then adds:
“I would give up my candidacy if this came at the request of the majority of the Coordination Framework.”
Translation:
If enough people tell me to leave, I’ll pretend it was their idea.
This is not negotiation.
This is damage control.
Non-Negotiable Reality
Savaya already made it clear:
The Iranian issue is non-negotiable.
Maliki’s long-standing ties, alignment, and political baggage place him squarely on the wrong side of Iraq’s future direction.
He can push.
He can posture.
But in the end—he must step aside
.
Allegations, Reputation, and Credibility
Maliki’s credibility issues are not new.
Over the years, serious allegations regarding substance abuse, medical emergencies abroad, and inappropriate conduct have circulated widely in political and intelligence circles. Whether fully substantiated or not, these stories have severely damaged international confidence in his leadership.
Perception matters in geopolitics.
And Maliki’s perception is toxic.
The Final Nail: Hikma Movement Confirms the Exit
In a very recent article dated 2/5, titled:
“A Leader in the Hikma Movement: Maliki Will Withdraw and the Coordination Framework Will Revert to the Original Six Names”
We receive confirmation from multiple fronts.
Key statements include:
Maliki lacks Kurdish consensus
Religious authority rejects his leadership
He is viewed as a controversial figure domestically and internationally
Current conditions are “completely unfavorable”
Parliament attendance from his supporters collapsed
Most importantly:
“Al-Maliki will withdraw, and the Coordination Framework will revert to the original six names.”
Translation:
Game over.
Featured Snippet: Key Insight
Nouri al-Maliki’s withdrawal is not voluntary—it is the result of U.S. pressure, Iraqi political rejection, religious opposition, and the collapse of his internal support base.
Q&A: What This Means Going Forward
Q: Is Maliki completely finished politically?
A: All indicators suggest this episode may be his final political miscalculation.
Q: Could Maliki face prosecution?
A: That remains unclear. Some believe legal consequences may follow, others believe he will quietly disappear from public life.
Q: Why does this matter for Iraq’s future?
A: Removing controversial figures clears the path for political reform, which is required before economic and currency reform.
Q: Who replaces Maliki?
A: The Coordination Framework is reverting to the original candidate list—minus Maliki.
Final Thoughts: The End of the Road
Maliki misjudged Trump.
He misjudged the U.S.
He misjudged Iraq.
And now, he has misjudged how little power he truly has.
Whether this ends in prosecution, exile, or quiet retirement, one thing is clear:
This chapter is closing.
And Iraq—finally—can move forward.
Stay Connected & Follow the Truth
🔹 Official Blog:
https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/
🔹 Telegram Channel:
https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION
🔹 Facebook Page:
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064023274131
🔹 Twitter / X:
https://x.com/DinaresGurus
🔹 YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/@DINARREVALUATION
🔹 Source & Reference (MNT GOAT):
https://mntgoatnewsusa.com/latest-mnt-goat-newsletter/
Hashtags
#MNTGOAT #MalikiOut #IraqPolitics #PoliticalReset #IraqReform
#GlobalReset #MiddleEastShift #TruthMatters #EndOfAnEra #RVWatch
MNT GOAT : Really? Is he in a position to place conditions?
Here is where Maliki is trying to save his face by showing he is not backing down to the US (he thinks he has so much power… really? 
) but in reality, we all know he is backing down because he has no power. Al-Maliki said in an interview on a local channel, which was monitored by the “Roj News” agency, that “he is an Iraqi citizen, and that his nomination for the position of Prime Minister of Iraq was done by an Iraqi institution, which is the “Coordination Framework”, and therefore it is not possible for him to withdraw based on a request from a foreign country.” However, in the previous article he tells us he is backing down for other reasons and not for reason of the US request.
Now he blames it all on Trump. It’s always Trumps fault…lol..lol..lol.. 
He added that “Trump was misled against his candidacy for a third term by three countries and domestic parties, adding: “I heard that the tweet was written here, but I haven’t confirmed this yet.” No Maliki Trump remembers the mess you made in Iraq from 2006-2014. That is why he does not want you back in power. It was your own fault Maliki! I want to add Maliki is know as a heroin addict and so this also impacts his thinking and decision making abilities. Does everyone remember when he was rushed from his London apartment to a hospital for his diabetes coma? The call to the hospital was made by multiple prostitutes in his room as they found him naked in the bed with needles and heroin. This is the dude they were going to put in to control Iraq? Again just a stupid puppet like Biden. Who is pulling the strings?
So, here is the real reason Maliki is deciding to back out – “Al-Maliki pointed out that his candidacy would not expose Iraq to economic sanctions by the United States, noting that this matter is being promoted with the aim of pushing towards abandoning this candidacy.” “According to the head of the State of Law Coalition, he would be prepared to give up his candidacy for prime minister if this came at the request of the majority of the coordinating framework.”
Do you really believe that the US president is going to take any condition/terms from Maliki in this situation? Savaya already told us this Iranian issue was non-negotiable for them. But Maliki will push it to whatever limits he needs in his attempt to get back in power. In others words Maliki must drop out and stand on the sidelines. I believe the end result for Maliki will be his final miscalculation of Trump and this episode will be the final straw that will get him out of politics once and for all. Will it mean prosecution for his crimes of the past? Or will he just show up dead someday?
Yet in another very recent article that was just published today, 2/5 we find more evidence Maliki is out. It is titled “A LEADER IN THE HIKMA MOVEMENT: MALIKI WILL WITHDRAW AND THE COORDINATION FRAMEWORK WILL REVERT TO THE ORIGINAL SIX NAMES”. In it we learn again of the Kurdish consensus and the religious authority’srejection of Maliki.I quote pieces from the article – “
“Fahd Al-Jubouri, a leader in the National Wisdom Movement, said in a televised interview:
The lack of Kurdish consensus on the presidency is not new.
The coordination framework did not obstruct the presidential election
. This week will be crucial in selecting candidates for both presidencies
. New scenarios regarding al-Maliki’s nomination will be presented and announced tomorrow
. The next government should not be headed by a controversial figure, both domestically and internationally
. Current circumstances are completely unfavorable for al-Maliki’s nomination as prime minister.
We do not expect al-Maliki to form a government
. The religious authority’s stance is part of the political forces’ reservations about al-Maliki
. Why didn’t the majority that nominated al-Maliki attend parliament?
Al-Maliki will withdraw, and the coordination framework will revert to the original six names.
So, who will get the nomination for prime minister? Seems they are reverting back to original five names. Yes, minus the peanut-head guy. Let me know what you think.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
EXCERPTS FROM MARKZ: THE EXCHANGE IN NON TAXABLE!! @DINARREVALUATION #iraqidinarinvestor
Read also: Dr. Tom Update: " ALL ZIM DENOMINATIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR REDEMPTION"
