Friday, February 6, 2026

MarkZ Update: Historic Bonds, Final Codes, and Why Iraq and Vietnam Must Go Together

Introduction: Quiet Movements Behind the Scenes

Sometimes the most important developments happen quietly, away from public headlines.

According to MarkZ, there have been significant movements involving Historic Bonds, U.S. Treasury participation, and final procedural steps that suggest something major may be approaching. While caution is still advised, the information coming from high-level sources paints a picture that is difficult to ignore.

MarkZ himself remains careful not to overhype—but even with restraint, the signals are strong.


Historic Bonds: Why This Matters

MarkZ shared that he has been hesitant to fully disclose certain details regarding Historic Bonds, primarily because of how sensitive this phase appears to be.

What we know so far:

This is critical because Historic Bonds have always been considered the “canary in the coal mine”—when they move, broader financial mechanisms often follow.


Money Is Already Moving

Perhaps the most compelling part of this update is that money movement is already being observed.

Not rumors.
Not expectations.
Actual movement.

MarkZ notes that individuals deeply involved in the process—at the paymaster level or higher—are seeing activity. Historically, this phase occurs right before public-facing financial events.

Still, MarkZ emphasizes caution:

“I don’t want to get people’s hopes up too much… stay grounded.”

But he also adds:

“It really looks that good.”


Key Insight: Bonds First, Then Us

One of MarkZ’s most consistent statements over the years has been this:

When the bonds go, we should be next.

This sequence has repeated itself across multiple financial restructurings and global settlement processes. Bonds represent trust and liquidity restoration, which must occur before currencies and exchanges can reset.


Reader Question: Why Not Vietnam First?

Question:

If Iraq appears to be postponed for now, why couldn’t Vietnam just RV on its own?

This is a logical and frequently asked question.


MarkZ’s Answer: They Are Intertwined

MarkZ’s response was clear and direct:

“They will go at the same time… they are intertwined.”

According to MarkZ, separating Iraq and Vietnam in the RV process would severely damage their treasuries. The currencies are structured in such a way that simultaneous movement is required to maintain financial balance.

Even more notable:

This information came from a contact working inside Iraq’s Finance Ministry.

That detail adds significant weight to the explanation.


Why Simultaneous RVs Matter

Here’s why going together matters:

  • Treasury reserves are structured jointly

  • Liquidity balancing requires synchronized adjustment

  • Isolated RVs create destabilizing arbitrage

  • Global settlement mechanisms are batch-based, not individual

In short:
One cannot safely move without the other.


Featured Snippet: Key Takeaway

According to MarkZ, Iraq and Vietnam currency revaluations must occur simultaneously because separating them would destabilize national treasuries and disrupt global financial balance.


Q&A: Breaking It Down

Q: Are Historic Bonds officially released yet?

A: Not publicly. According to MarkZ, they are awaiting a final code release, which typically precedes payouts.

Q: Is the U.S. Treasury really involved?

A: MarkZ states that UST is acting as a purchaser in certain bond transactions.

Q: Does money movement mean RV is imminent?

A: Historically, yes—but timing remains uncertain. This phase suggests advanced readiness.

Q: Can Vietnam RV without Iraq?

A: No. MarkZ confirms they are financially intertwined and must move together.


Why Staying Grounded Matters

MarkZ’s tone remains consistent:

  • Optimistic, but cautious

  • Encouraging, but realistic

  • Hopeful, but grounded

This balance is essential. Overexcitement leads to disappointment. Understanding the process helps maintain clarity.


Final Thoughts: Watching the Right Signals

The key signals to watch are not headlines or hype—but:

  • Bond movement

  • Treasury-level participation

  • Paymaster activity

  • Final code releases

These are structural indicators, not speculation.

If MarkZ is right—and history suggests he often is—then what follows the bonds could change everything.


Stay Connected & Follow Ongoing Updates

🔹 Official Blog:
https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/

🔹 Telegram Channel:
https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION

🔹 Facebook Page:
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064023274131

🔹 Twitter / X:
https://x.com/DinaresGurus

🔹 YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/@DINARREVALUATION

🔹 Source Reference:
MarkZ Commentary (compiled)


 Hashtags

#MarkZ #HistoricBonds #RVUpdate #IraqDinar #VietnamDong
#GlobalReset #BondMarket #USTreasury #FinancialReset #StayGrounded

MarkZ   

There have been some interesting things on Historic Bonds that I have been somewhat hesitant to share...Some of the deals that have been worked out through UST (US Treasury) as the purchasers…. I am told they have finished up with their I’s dotted and crossed their t’s and are waiting for the final code release...we are seeing money movement by people very involved in the process. (At the paymaster level or higher) I don’t want to get people hopes up too much…so stay grounded. But it really looks that good. [MarkZ always says that when the bonds go we should be next.]

Question:  So with Iraq being  seemingly postponed for now - Why couldn’t Vietnam just RV now

 MarkZ:  They will go at the same time…they are intertwined and it would crush their treasuries to go separately …that is how it was told to me by someone who works in the Finance Ministry in Iraq. 

Sandy Ingram Warns: Maliki, Trump, and the Dollar Risk to Iraq’s Development Road

  Introduction: A Concerning Political and Monetary Signal Recent commentary from  Sandy Ingram  highlights growing concerns on two critical...