JEFF: " THE RATE WILL CHANGE ON A SUNDAY MORNING" @DINARREVALUATION

Read also: THE STRUCTURED PAYOUT SYSTEM: The Amount Paid For Each Zim Dollar

BETWEEN “TEXT” AND “REALITY”: POSTPONING THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PUTS THE IRAQI CONSTITUTION TO THE TEST OF TIME LIMITS

 BETWEEN “TEXT” AND “REALITY”: POSTPONING THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PUTS THE IRAQI CONSTITUTION TO THE TEST OF TIME LIMITS.

With the postponement of the parliamentary session scheduled to elect the president, the current crisis transcends the bounds of a mere political procedure, opening a deeper debate about the constitution’s place in the Iraqi equation and the extent to which the timeframes it stipulates for the transfer of power are respected.

The constitutional deadline for electing the president has once again become a flexible detail in the bargaining arena between political forces, while the text itself is relegated to the realm of theoretical reference. Considerations of “consensus” and “political restructuring” take precedence over adherence to binding deadlines, in a scenario that reproduces the unwritten norms accumulated during previous parliamentary sessions, norms that allow for the obstruction of entitlements whenever they clash with the calculations of the political blocs.

The Iraqi Constitution, in Article (72/Second/B), stipulates that the President of the Republic must be elected within (30) days of the first session of the new Parliament, to ensure the continuity of legitimacy and prevent a power vacuum

Read also: THE STRUCTURED PAYOUT SYSTEM: The Amount Paid For Each Zim Dollar

.

However, practical experience since 2005 has established a pattern of exceeding these deadlines under the pretexts of “lack of quorum” or “the need for more time to reach an understanding.” This has gradually created a situation resembling a parallel “political custom” and “constitutional custom,” where deadlines are treated as subject to postponement and flexibility as dictated by the balance of power and the deals of the moment. With each new postponement, the impression is reinforced that the “political deal” holds greater authority than the constitutional text, and that deadlines can be suspended as long as an agreement has not yet been finalized behind closed doors.

In this context, legal and political affairs expert Ali Habib warned that violating the constitutional deadlines set for electing the president of the republic “is a clear violation of the provisions of the constitution and directly affects the legitimacy of the entire political process,” warning of “serious legal and political repercussions that may extend to the work of all constitutional authorities.”

Habib told Baghdad Today that “the Iraqi constitution has set clear time limits for completing constitutional entitlements, foremost among them the election of the president of the republic, with the aim of ensuring a smooth transfer of power and preventing a constitutional vacuum. Exceeding these time limits without constitutional justifications is considered a violation of the principle of the supremacy of the constitution and a weakening of the prestige of the constitutional text.”

He explained that “the legal implications of this violation are represented in the possibility of challenging the legitimacy of subsequent procedures, especially those related to the appointment of the Prime Minister and the formation of the government. The continuation of this violation places the Supreme Federal Court in front of a sensitive interpretive responsibility, and may open the door to accumulated constitutional crises that will be difficult to contain later.”

On the political level, the expert in legal and political affairs warned that “obstructing the election of the President of the Republic perpetuates the state of political deadlock and deepens the loss of confidence among political forces, in addition to its negative impact on internal stability and the image of the political process in front of local and international public opinion, and the continuation of constitutional violations reinforces the logic of political norms at the expense of legal texts.”

While calls are increasing to respect constitutional deadlines and not turn them into mere “flexible recommendations” subject to the fluctuations of understandings, observers believe that the accumulation of these violations turns the crisis of electing the president of the republic into a repeated model of a broader crisis between “text” and “reality,” where the supremacy of the constitution recedes in the face of customs formed from precedents of postponement and temporary settlements, with the accompanying risks to the stability of the political system and the public’s confidence in the legitimacy of its institutions.

CLARE: 🚨 BREAKING: U.S. BLOCKS MALIKI — IRAQ’S POLITICAL STALEMATE COULD TRIGGER MAJOR FINANCIAL SHIFTS

🔥 MUST READ: WHY MALIKI’S REJECTION MATTERS FAR BEYOND POLITICS

According to Clare’s latest intel, supported by reporting from Al-Hurra and Bloomberg, the United States has taken an unusually firm and public stance against the potential return of Nouri al-Maliki as Prime Minister of Iraq.

This is not just a political disagreement.

This is a strategic warning with economic consequences—and it may directly affect:

• Iraq’s oil revenues

• The Central Bank of Iraq (CBI)

• Ongoing financial and monetary reforms

Let’s break down what’s happening and why it matters.

---

🛑 U.S. DELIVERS A “CATEGORICAL” REJECTION OF MALIKI

Source: Al-Hurra (U.S.-based outlet)

Read also: THE STRUCTURED PAYOUT SYSTEM: The Amount Paid For Each Zim Dollar

Al-Hurra cited sources within Iraq’s Coordination Framework, stating that:

The failure to elect a president was directly linked to disputes over the nomination of Nouri al-Maliki.

More importantly, the report confirms:

U.S. officials informed Maliki that his nomination was “categorically rejected.”

This was not diplomatic ambiguity.

It was a clear veto.

---

📞 MALIKI ATTEMPTED BACKCHANNEL TALKS — THEY FAILED

According to the same sources:

• Maliki attempted to open communication channels with American officials

• He sought to determine whether Trump-era opposition could be negotiated

• The response from Washington was decisive and final

The Warning:

Proceeding with Maliki’s nomination will have repercussions.

This signals that any political process ignoring this warning risks serious fallout.

---

💣 BLOOMBERG CONFIRMS: OIL REVENUES AT RISK

Source: Bloomberg

Bloomberg escalated the story dramatically by reporting that:

Washington has threatened to reduce Iraq’s access to its oil export revenues if Maliki is appointed Prime Minister.

This is an extraordinary move.

Oil revenues are the lifeblood of Iraq’s economy.

---

🛢️ WHY THE U.S. IS TAKING THIS STANCE

According to Bloomberg sources:

• The U.S. views Maliki as closely aligned with Iran

• His return would signal a shift away from Western-aligned reforms

• This would jeopardize transparency, banking compliance, and sanctions enforcement

In short:

Maliki is seen as incompatible with Iraq’s financial reform path.

---

🏦 CRITICAL MEETING: CBI GOVERNOR & U.S. OFFICIALS IN TÜRKİYE

One of the most important details in this intel:

🔑 High-Level Meeting Confirmed

• Ali Al-Alaq, Governor of the Central Bank of Iraq

• Met with senior U.S. officials

• Location: Türkiye

• Timing: Last week

During this meeting:

The United States issued a new warning regarding Maliki’s nomination.

This strongly suggests that:

• The CBI is under direct international scrutiny

• Financial reform and political leadership are now inseparably linked

---

📉 WHAT THIS MEANS FOR IRAQ’S POLITICAL DEADLOCK

The inability to elect:

• A president

• A prime minister

Is no longer just an internal Iraqi issue.

It has become:

• A geopolitical standoff

• A financial pressure point

• A trigger for external intervention

Washington has made it clear:

Certain outcomes will not be tolerated.

---

🌍 BIGGER PICTURE: POLITICS, OIL & MONETARY REFORM

Why this matters to global observers:

✔️ Iraq’s oil revenues flow through international systems
✔️ The CBI is central to currency reform and compliance
✔️ Political leadership affects banking transparency
✔️ Stability is required for any meaningful economic transition

This is about control, trust, and reform—not just personalities.

---

📌 FEATURED SNIPPET: KEY TAKEAWAYS

Did the U.S. reject Maliki’s nomination?
Yes. U.S. officials categorically rejected it and warned of consequences.

What consequences were mentioned?
Potential reduction of Iraq’s access to oil export revenues.

Was the Central Bank of Iraq involved?
Yes. The CBI Governor met U.S. officials in Türkiye and received a formal warning.

---

❓ Q&A – QUICK CLARITY

Q: Is Maliki officially blocked by the U.S.?
A: While not a legal block, the rejection is explicit and enforced through economic leverage.

Q: Can the U.S. really withhold oil revenues?
A: Access to revenues flows through systems influenced by U.S. policy and compliance mechanisms.

Q: Why involve the CBI Governor?
A: Because financial reform, sanctions compliance, and oil revenue management are interconnected.

Q: What happens next?
A: Either Iraq changes course politically—or faces escalating pressure.

---

🔔 FINAL THOUGHTS FROM CLARE’S INTEL

This is not noise.

This is direct intervention signaling.

Silence from Iraqi leadership and quiet diplomacy from global players often indicate that decisions are being forced behind the scenes.

History shows:

When Washington speaks this clearly, outcomes usually follow.

---

🔗 Stay Connected for Ongoing Updates

🌐 Official Blog:
👉 https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/

📢 Telegram:
👉 https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION

📘 Facebook:
👉 https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064023274131

🐦 X / Twitter:
👉 https://x.com/DinaresGurus

🎥 YouTube:
👉 https://www.youtube.com/@DINARREVALUATION

---

🔥  Hashtags

#IraqCrisis
#MalikiBlocked
#USPressure
#IraqOil
#CentralBankOfIraq
#MiddleEastPolitics
#GeopoliticalShift
#FinancialReform
#BreakingIntel
#GlobalMarkets

Clare 

Article: "Al-Hurra website, citing sources: US officials informed Maliki that his nomination was  'categorically' rejectedand that proceeding with it would have consequences" 

 Quote "The US-based Al-Hurra website quoted sources  from the coordination framework as saying that the failure to elect a president...was due to the dispute over the nomination  of...Nouri al-Maliki...She added that Maliki...tried to open channels of communication with American officials to find out if Trump's veto was negotiable, but the response was decisive...proceeding with his nomination will have repercussions..."      

 Article: "Bloomberg: Washington threatens to withhold Iraqi oil revenues because of Maliki US officials met with the governor of the Central Bank of Iraq in Türkiye last week" 

Quote: "Sources told Bloomberg that Washington informed Iraqi officials in recent days that it might reduce Iraq's access to oil export revenues if Nouri al-Maliki is appointed prime minister, given the US view of him as being close to Iran...the United States issued a new warning during a meeting held last week in Türkiye between the Governor of the Central Bank of Iraq, Ali Al-Alaq, and senior American officials."