🇮🇶🚀 IRAQ'S LONG-TERM VISION: REVIVING THE IRAQI DINAR THROUGH ECONOMIC REFORM
One of the most important takeaways from Iraq's latest economic announcement is the government's clear commitment to strengthening and revitalizing the Iraqi dinar over time.
According to Financial Advisor Mudher Mohammad Saleh, the government of Prime Minister Ali Falih al-Zaidi has adopted a comprehensive package of long-term economic reforms aimed at protecting the purchasing power of the dinar, reducing inflation, improving financial stability, and supporting sustainable economic growth.
What makes this announcement significant is that Iraqi officials are openly discussing a strategy designed to improve the strength of the national currency. However, they also emphasized that this process will not occur through a sudden overnight revaluation or short-term administrative decision.
Instead, the government is pursuing a gradual approach based on structural reforms, modernization of the financial sector, increased economic diversification, stronger fiscal policies, and continued development of Iraq's economic institutions.
This means that any future strengthening of the Iraqi dinar is expected to be tied to real economic progress rather than temporary measures. As reforms advance and economic fundamentals improve, the long-term objective is to create a stronger and more stable national currency capable of supporting Iraq's growth and attracting greater investment.
For observers of Iraq's economy and the Iraqi dinar, the positive message is clear: the government is not abandoning the goal of enhancing the dinar's strength. Rather, it is seeking to achieve that objective through a disciplined, sustainable, and reform-driven strategy.
While the process may take time, the continued focus on economic reform, inflation control, monetary stability, and financial modernization reflects a long-term vision aimed at building a stronger Iraqi economy—and ultimately a stronger Iraqi dinar.
🇮🇶📈 The path may be gradual, but the direction remains focused on economic progress, stability, and the future strength of Iraq's national currency.
❤️ Thank you for being part of this community. If you enjoy my content, please consider liking, commenting, and sharing this post. These simple actions help the algorithm reach more people and allow this information to be seen by a wider audience.
Zaidi’s government adapt long-term plan to revive Iraqi dinar
Baghdad (IraqiNews.com) –
The financial advisor to the Prime Minister, Mudher Mohammad Saleh, announced on Saturday, June 6, 2026, that the government of Ali Falih al-Zaidi has adopted a comprehensive package of long-term reformative measures designed to shield the purchasing power of the Iraqi dinar and curb inflation.
Saleh explicitly ruled out any possibility of raising the national currency’s value through abrupt, short-term administrative decrees, stating that sustainable monetary strength relies on deep structural overhauls rather than quick political fixes.
According to Saleh, the current government strategy has successfully stabilized market prices for consumer goods by channeling import financing through official banking systems, backed heavily by the state’s foreign currency reserves. This monetary control has been further reinforced by the physical expansion of modern, state-backed cooperative grocery networks and advanced marketing frameworks. These parallel commercial steps have significantly diminished the influence of the informal shadow exchange market on the domestic pricing system, helping cap inflationary pressures.
However, the financial advisor issued a stark warning regarding active macroeconomic variables putting downward pressure on the dinar. Chief among these threats are rigid geopolitical constraints imposed on global energy markets, escalating regional conflicts, and the resulting volatility in foreign currency inflows and overall economic confidence. Saleh noted that an over-reliance on volatile crude oil revenues, unchecked monetary expansion, and any future drops in official reserves pose direct risks to the country’s fiscal health.
To permanently secure the currency, Saleh emphasized that the government is actively working on a long-term economic transition plan. This framework focuses on aggressively building up foreign exchange reserves, diversifying national income streams away from oil dependence, and stabilizing the country’s balance of payments.
Furthermore, the administration’s roadmap relies heavily on accelerating commercial banking sector reforms, rapidly expanding digital and electronic payment tools, and widening national financial inclusion to systematically dismantle the parallel market’s leverage over the national economy.
🚨🌍 Breaking News: Iraq receives a major boost toward economic transformation
I find this very encouraging… and honestly, there’s a good reason why.
The World Bank has approved $900 million in financing for Iraq, and this isn’t just money… it’s a strong signal of international confidence in the country’s direction.
This funding is designed for something much bigger than isolated projects. Its purpose is to connect Iraq internally and regionally, strengthening infrastructure and positioning the country as a key player in global trade.
📍 This is where the Development Road Project comes in: It aims to transform Iraq into an international transit hub, linking Asia, Europe, and the Middle East through modern transport and logistics corridors.
With this $900 million, the project now has the support it needs to move forward smoothly and effectively, activating a foundation that has been built over the past several years.
👤 The leadership of Prime Minister Mohammed Shia' Al Sudani has been critical. His administration laid the groundwork—economically, politically, and structurally—for this moment. It’s almost like he passed the baton to the next phase, where equally capable leadership will carry this vision forward into completion.
🌱 What we’re witnessing is the beginning of a new phase:
Greater economic stability
Real regional integration
Long-term sustainable progress
And here’s my opinion: To sustain all of this over time, Iraq will need strong fundamentals to support the value of its currency.
💭
I believe the stage is being set to support a stronger Real Effective Exchange Rate in the future. Infrastructure, international investment, and stability are not coincidences—they are essential building blocks for that outcome.
📈 The revaluation of the dinar will happen as soon as this issue is finally resolved.
❤️ Thank you for being part of this community. If you enjoy my content, please consider liking, commenting, and sharing this post. These simple actions help the algorithm reach more people and allow this information to be seen by a wider audience.
❤️ Thank you for being part of this community. If you enjoy my content, please consider liking, commenting, and sharing this post. These simple actions help the algorithm reach more people and allow this information to be seen by a wider audience.
🇮🇶📊 IRAQ CURRENT SITUATION REPORT – MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS UNDERWAY 🚀
Iraq continues to show signs of significant political, economic, and institutional transformation. Here are some of the most important recent developments:
✅ The government remains focused on protecting the purchasing power of the Iraqi dinar, controlling inflation, and maintaining exchange rate stability. 💵
✅ Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi's administration is advancing economic reforms that officials describe as a major transition in Iraq's economic management. 📈
✅ Efforts to place all weapons under state authority continue, with increasing discussions about reducing the influence of armed factions operating outside full government control. 🏛️
✅ Iraq is working to strengthen fiscal discipline, with officials emphasizing reduced unnecessary spending and greater focus on essential services. 💰
✅ The 2026 budget remains under discussion and is expected to be one of the most complex in recent years due to regional and economic challenges. 📊
✅ The United States has signaled a stronger regional security approach toward Iraq and Syria, while negotiations involving Iran continue to be closely monitored. 🌍
📌 Overall, the direction of recent developments suggests a continued push toward stronger institutions, greater state authority, economic modernization, and long-term financial stability.
The coming months could prove to be among the most important periods for Iraq's future trajectory. 🇮🇶✨
❤️ Thank you for being part of this community. If you enjoy my content, please consider liking, commenting, and sharing this post. These simple actions help the algorithm reach more people and allow this information to be seen by a wider audience.
🚨🇮🇶 IRAQ PUSHES FOR FULL CONTROL OF WEAPONS – A TURNING POINT? ⚔️📈
New reports reveal that the U.S. has been applying sustained pressure on Iraq to ensure that all weapons are brought under state control, reducing the influence of Iran-aligned militias.
Several major factions have already begun steps to hand over weapons and integrate into state structures, signaling real movement — not just political talk.
However, not all groups are on board. Some powerful factions are still resisting, demanding the withdrawal of foreign forces before disarming.
💡 This shows Iraq is at a critical moment: 👉 Moving toward stronger sovereignty 👉 Building a unified military structure 👉 Increasing stability and investor confidence
⚠️ But internal divisions still remain, and the outcome is not fully guaranteed yet.
💭 My opinion: The revaluation of the Iraqi dinar will happen as soon as this issue is finally resolved.
🌍 If Iraq succeeds in centralizing control and stabilizing its security environment, it could mark a major shift not only politically, but economically as well.
❤️ Thank you for being part of this community. If you enjoy my content, please consider liking, commenting, and sharing this post. These simple actions help the algorithm reach more people and allow this information to be seen by a wider audience.
How the US pushed Iraq's armed factions toward disarmament, and who is still pushing back
Shafaq News
The American approach to Iraq's Iran-aligned armed factions has undergone a quiet but consequential transformation. The appointment of Tom Barrack as special envoy for Iraq and Syria, replacing Mark Savaya, signals a shift not in objectives but in the method of pursuing them. The US still wants Iran's military footprint in Iraq reduced, but it is now trying to achieve that through structural pressure rather than visible interference.
The distinction matters because Savaya was perceived across Baghdad's political class as a figure who reached too deeply into Iraqi internal arrangements. Barrack, according to analysts interviewed by Shafaq news, represents a different profile: a businessman with direct ties to President Donald Trump, a preference for strong central states over consociational power-sharing, and a mandate that deliberately bundles Iraq with Syria under a single envoy.
Dilshad Othman, a researcher in international relations at the University of Tennessee, told Shafaq News that the United States no longer treats Iraq as a file with its own internal logic; it treats it as a node in a broader regional security order aimed at reconfiguring the balance of power and curtailing Iranian influence.
The apparatus Barrack inherits is already substantially built. Since early 2025, the Trump administration has operated on multiple simultaneous tracks: diplomatic pressure on Baghdad to restrict weapons to state authority; congressional conditions tying security cooperation funding to verifiable reductions in Iran-aligned factions' capacity; sanctions on banks and businessmen, direct warnings that Washington would not recognize a government that handed ministries to armed factions linked to Tehran; and, beneath all of this, a military option kept deliberately visible.
The Shiite Coordination Framework's authorization of Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi to take all necessary measures to restrict weapons to state control was presented by the alliance as a sovereign national position. Malik Francis, a Republican politician and political analyst, told Shafaq News that Washington views these steps positively, stating that "Iraq's long-term stability requires the state to be the sole entity authorized to carry and use weapons within legal frameworks." The welcome was not merely rhetorical: Francis situated US support within a broader effort to strengthen Iraqi state institutions and the rule of law, and added that consolidating the state's monopoly on force would improve the investment climate and enhance foreign business confidence in the Iraqi market, an economic framing that signals Washington is offering something beyond diplomatic approval.
The US Chargé d'Affaires Joshua Harris's welcome of the CF's authorization, described as a "qualitative shift" toward Iraqi sovereignty, arrived within a diplomatic framework designed to make that shift the only viable path. Patrick Clawson, the Morningstar senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, assessed the CF's authorization as consolidating an existing reality rather than representing a sudden rupture. The political groundwork, he argued, had been laid over many months.
Asaib Ahl al-Haq's announcement —forming a central committee to inventory weapons, personnel, and equipment and transfer them to state authority— was the first concrete institutional step any major Iran-aligned faction had taken. AAH operates Brigades 41, 42, and 43 within the Popular Mobilization Forces and maintains a parliamentary wing through the Sadiqoon bloc. Kataib Imam Ali (Brigade 40 of the PMF), which also holds five parliamentary seats through its Khadamat bloc, followed with a parallel decision. That two factions moved in close succession, each with named institutional mandates, signals something beyond individual calculation.
The process has since moved from political authorization to physical implementation. Major General Saad Maan, head of the Security Media Cell, announced the first practical steps in the merger process: the handover of Saraya al-Salam headquarters and weapons in Samarra, following Muqtada al-Sadr's decision to place the force under state authority. Al-Sadr's move —primarily a domestic political maneuver by a figure who has long maintained distance from Iran's direct orbit— added momentum and removed one argument for hesitation from CF-aligned factions.
The visit by retired General David Petraeus to Baghdad in mid-May 2026, formally as a private citizen providing independent advisory services to the White House, added a further dimension to the US pressure arrangement. After five days of meetings with senior Iraqi officials, Petraeus wrote that his interlocutors "recognized the importance of ensuring that the Iraqi Security Services have a monopoly on the use of force in Iraq." The visit was not publicly acknowledged as official; its significance lay precisely in the fact that a channel allowed frank exchange without the formality of a diplomatic confrontation.
What Petraeus found reflected a factional landscape in transition. Several groups, including Kataib Sayyid al-Shuhada, Ansar Allah al-Awfiya, had signaled varying degrees of readiness to support weapons restriction. The direction of travel among the pragmatic wing of the resistance ecosystem was, for the first time in years, discernibly toward accommodation. The choice to route that assessment through a retired general operating outside official channels was not incidental; it reflects a deliberate American preference for pressure that is felt without being formally applied, credible precisely because it carries no diplomatic obligation to follow through.
That direction of travel does not extend to all factions, as Kataib Hezbollah, Harakat al-Nujaba, and Ashab al-Kahf have rejected disarmament without preconditions, specifically, the complete withdrawal of US and Turkish forces from Iraqi territory.
Kataib Hezbollah remains one of the most operationally capable factions within the PMF; its Secretary-General Abu Hussein al-Hamidawi survived a US strike in Baghdad's Karrada district in March 2026 that killed three associates. The faction has publicly stated readiness to respond to the United States across all fronts if PMF leaders are targeted.
The divergence within what was presented as a unified resistance framework now exposes a structural fracture: CF-aligned factions that contested the November 2025 elections and are seeking roles in the next government have different incentive structures from Islamic Resistance in Iraq groups that define their weapons as existential and their strategic alignment with Tehran as non-negotiable. The former calculate that accommodation buys political survival and economic legitimacy; the latter calculate that disarmament eliminates their deterrence and exposes their leadership to legal or physical targeting. Both calculations are rational within their own framework.
Sources within the CF told Shafaq News of an internal split over an American proposal that sharpens the transactional character of the disarmament process: the US would facilitate service and investment projects inside Iraq, implemented by American companies, in exchange for progress on weapons restriction and factional handovers. The proposal has divided CF member parties, with some viewing it as a legitimate economic incentive and others resistant to what they read as a conditioned bargain.
The pattern fits a broader American operating mode. In May 2025, Trump announced a ceasefire with the Houthis in Yemen, mediated by Oman, under which the US halted its bombing campaign in exchange for the group ceasing attacks on American ships. The deal bypassed Israel and left the Houthis free to continue strikes on Israeli targets, exposing the transactional rather than principled character of the arrangement. Trump's subsequent public claim of engagement with Hezbollah in Lebanon this June, occurring in the same window as Washington's welcome of the CF stance, follows the same logic: bilateral deals on narrow US interests, coercive pressure maintained on the broader Iranian influence design.
Ali al-Baydar, a Baghdad-based political analyst, told Shafaq News that Barrack's mandate reflects a US desire to manage Iraq, Syria, Turkiye, and Iran as a single interconnected file, and that "the weapons question is one instrument within that larger arrangement, not an end in itself."
Iraqi politician Mithal al-Alusi argued that Iraq and the region need the "institutional United States" more than they need a presidential envoy, warning that handling Iraq through the same lens as Syria “risks misreading the country's political complexity and undermining the strategic partnership between Baghdad and Washington.”
Haitham Numan, professor of political science at the University of Exeter, assessed Barrack as oriented toward strong central states rather than consociational arrangements. This preference aligns with al-Zaidi's government program but sits uneasily with the federal and pluralist structure Iraq has operated under since 2003.
Iraq's weapons restriction process has reached a threshold it has approached and retreated from before. The difference this time is the accumulation of external pressurث —legislative, diplomatic, financial, and military— that has raised the cost of inaction to a level that several CF-aligned factions now judge unsustainable. The Samarra handover, the CF's authorization, the Harris-al-Araji meeting, the Petraeus visit, and the economic incentive framework: these are the visible outputs of a sustained pressure campaign Washington has been constructing for over a year.
Despite these developments, the campaign cannot resolve the internal fracture it has helped produce. Kataib Hezbollah and Harakat al-Nujaba's refusal is strategic and rooted in a calculation that their weapons are the only guarantee of their survival in any post-accommodation environment. The CF split over the American investment proposal signals that even among compliant factions, the terms of compliance remain contested. If al-Zaidi's government formation proceeds without resolving that fracture, Iraq enters the final phase of the US withdrawal agreement with a bifurcated security landscape: factions nominally integrated and others openly defiant, and no unified position capable of holding both.
❤️ Thank you for being part of this community. If you enjoy my content, please consider liking, commenting, and sharing this post. These simple actions help the algorithm reach more people and allow this information to be seen by a wider audience.
@thenewregion · 3h Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi’s financial adviser, Madher Mohammed Salih, said Saturday that the government has taken measures to protect the purchasing power of the Iraqi dinar and curb inflation - State media
Salih said exchange rate stability is aimed at "protecting the external value of the national currency and maintaining the stability of the general price level," adding that a stable exchange rate has strengthened confidence in the dinar and supported citizens’ purchasing power -----
🇮🇶
Iraqi Prime Minister's financial advisor, Mudher Mohammed Salih, stated on Saturday that the government has taken measures to protect the purchasing power of the Iraqi dinar and curb inflation.
Salih explained that exchange rate stability is intended to:
✅ Protect the external value of the national currency. ✅ Maintain overall price stability. ✅ Strengthen confidence in the Iraqi dinar. ✅ Support citizens' purchasing power.
He also noted that a stable exchange rate has helped increase confidence in the dinar and preserve the population's ability to purchase goods and services.
What does this mean?
From an economic perspective, the message is significant because the government is reaffirming that:
📌 Stability of the dinar remains a national priority. 📌 Protecting citizens' purchasing power is a central objective. 📌 Controlling inflation continues to be a key component of economic policy. 📌 Confidence in the national currency is considered essential for the country's financial stability.
The most important takeaway
"Exchange rate stability has strengthened confidence in the dinar and supported citizens' purchasing power."
This statement reflects the government's commitment to a strong and stable currency that can support the economy and protect the population from inflationary pressures.
It is clear that the government's goal is to continue strengthening the national currency and reinforcing confidence in the Iraqi dinar, ensuring that it maintains its purchasing power and contributes to the country's economic stability. 🇮🇶📈
❤️ Thank you for being part of this community. If you enjoy my content, please consider liking, commenting, and sharing this post. These simple actions help the algorithm reach more people and allow this information to be seen by a wider audience.
