🔗📢 FOLLOW & JOIN OUR COMMUNITY
📌 BLOG: https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/
📌 TELEGRAM: https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION
📌 X (TWITTER): https://x.com/DinarWatchTeam
📌 BLUESKY: https://bsky.app/profile/dinaresgurus.bsky.social
📌 BLOG: https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/
📌 TELEGRAM: https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION
📌 X (TWITTER): https://x.com/DinarWatchTeam
📌 BLUESKY: https://bsky.app/profile/dinaresgurus.bsky.social
🛢️🤝 IRAQ: THE BAGHDAD–ERBIL UNDERSTANDING AND WHY IT COULD BE KEY TO THE COUNTRY’S ECONOMIC STABILITY 🇮🇶📊
Recent news about “understandings” between Baghdad and Erbil are not isolated events, but part of a long-standing historical conflict that has shaped Iraq’s political and economic landscape for more than two decades.
Since 2003, Iraq has operated under a federal system where:
However, three major issues have never been fully resolved:
Oil is Iraq’s main source of national income.
The conflict arises because:
When there is no agreement:
When an agreement is reached:
Current reports highlight progress in:
👉 In essence: an attempt to move from temporary deals to permanent rules.
This is the most important economic link:
The Iraqi dinar (IQD) does not function purely as a free-market currency. Its stability is strongly influenced by the strength of the state financed by oil revenues.
👉 Result: higher economic and financial uncertainty
👉 Result: stronger financial stability and a more stable dinar environment
These agreements are not only political, but deeply economic:
Without coordination:
With coordination:
The Baghdad–Erbil rapprochement represents more than a political negotiation:
👉 an attempt to stabilize Iraq’s economic core
👉 a key factor in managing oil, budget distribution, and state revenue
👉 a direct influence on Iraqi dinar stability
👉 and a potential foundation for broader economic reform in the country
📌 BLOG: https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/
📌 TELEGRAM: https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION
📌 X (TWITTER): https://x.com/DinarWatchTeam
#Iraq #Baghdad #Erbil #Kurdistan #IraqiDinar #OilEconomy #IraqiPolitics #EnergyMarkets #EconomicReform #MiddleEast #FiscalPolicy #Geopolitics #OilAndGas #Macroeconomy #IraqNews
Wafa Muhammad Karim, a member of the Kurdistan Democratic Party, said on Monday (May 25, 2026) that the visit of the Prime Minister of the Kurdistan Region, Masrour Barzani, to Baghdad was very important, especially in light of the positive understandings with the government of Prime Minister Ali al-Zubaidi.
Karim told Baghdad Today that “there are many outstanding contentious issues between the governments of Baghdad and Erbil that have persisted for more than a decade and a half, but the current phase has witnessed practical steps to implement a number of demands, especially those related to the oil file and moving towards enacting the oil and gas law.”
He added that “the current moves also include fixing the region’s share of the budget and keeping the issue of salaries away from political wrangling, which the Prime Minister emphasized during his recent statements.”
He explained that there is “full support for the government of Ali al-Zaidi as long as it continues to implement the constitutional demands that he had previously emphasized during his visit to Erbil,” indicating that the agreements related to the oil file, the “Sycoda” customs system, and the state’s revenue shares, in addition to the return of oil companies to work in the Kurdistan Region, all need broad political and parliamentary support.
Karim pointed out that implementing Article 140 and guaranteeing the region’s share of the budget are an essential part of the ongoing understandings between the two sides.
He explained that Masrour Barzani held meetings with a number of political leaders from the Sunni and Shiite components, with the aim of rallying political and parliamentary support for the agreement concluded between the governments of Baghdad and Erbil.
He added that the regional government also submitted a proposal to Baghdad regarding the lighting project and support for electricity in Baghdad and other governorates, in addition to the governorates of the Kurdistan Region, noting that the Minister of Electricity was present during these moves.
He stressed that “the current indicators are very good,” noting that Masrour Barzani expressed his optimism about the new government, and considered that “the positive points in the relationship between Baghdad and Erbil have become more than the points of contention.”
Relations between the federal government in Baghdad and the Kurdistan Region have been marked for years by multiple contentious issues related to oil, gas, the budget, the salaries of the region’s employees, as well as the management of border crossings and the implementation of Article 140 concerning the disputed territories.
During the last phase, political calls intensified for finding lasting understandings between the two sides, given the need to strengthen political and economic stability, especially with the continued financial, energy and services challenges in Iraq.
🏛️🇮🇶 2026 BUDGET: IS IRAQ BUILDING THE FOUNDATION FOR A STRONGER DINAR? 💰📈
Iraq's Parliament has revealed the four key pillars for the 2026 budget, and while most people are focused on the $60 per barrel oil benchmark, there may be a much bigger story unfolding beneath the surface.
The four pillars are:
✅ Setting a conservative oil price of $60 per barrel.
✅ Rationalizing public spending.
✅ Increasing non-oil revenues.
✅ Reducing dependence on oil as the primary source of budget financing.
At first glance, this appears to be a simple fiscal strategy designed to protect Iraq from oil market volatility, regional tensions, and uncertainty surrounding global energy markets. However, when viewed alongside Iraq's broader reform agenda, the implications become much more significant.
For years, Iraq has been working to modernize its banking sector, strengthen its financial system, attract foreign investment, improve international compliance standards, expand private-sector growth, and diversify its economy beyond oil. These are not the actions of a country focused solely on short-term survival. They are the actions of a nation attempting to build a sustainable long-term economic foundation.
What stands out most is the repeated emphasis on reducing dependence on oil revenues. This has become one of the central themes of Iraq's economic transformation. A country that generates stronger non-oil revenues gains greater financial stability, better control of its budget, and increased resilience against external shocks.
Why does this matter?
Because strong currencies are typically supported by strong economic fundamentals.
A nation that reduces deficits, diversifies revenue streams, strengthens its banking system, protects sovereign assets, and expands economic activity creates conditions that are more supportive of monetary stability and future currency strength.
The article itself does not mention a revaluation of the Iraqi dinar. However, many observers view these reforms as part of the foundation that would be necessary before any major monetary change could realistically occur.
This raises an important question:
🤔 If Iraq is working to diversify its economy, strengthen its financial institutions, resolve legacy financial issues, reduce debt risks, protect sovereign funds, advance the HCL framework, and lessen dependence on oil revenues, what is the ultimate destination of all these reforms?
Some believe the answer could eventually include a stronger and more internationally integrated Iraqi dinar.
Whether that means a future revaluation remains to be seen. But what is increasingly difficult to ignore is that Iraq continues to focus on the exact economic pillars that support long-term monetary strength: fiscal discipline, economic diversification, financial modernization, and sovereign economic independence.
In her interview with Al-Sabah, she indicated that there are discussions within the committee regarding ways to reduce the financial deficit in light of declining global expectations for oil prices, warning that any change in the prices of oil derivatives may gradually affect the living conditions of citizens.
In the same vein, Dr. Ali Al-Azirjawi, a member of the State of Law Coalition, called for the adoption of an emergency plan similar to the Food Security Law should the 2026 budget not be approved within the constitutional
--------
Iraq’s parliamentary Oil, Gas, and Natural Resources Committee has outlined a strategy to protect the 2026 national budget amid oil market volatility and regional geopolitical tensions.
Iraq is designing its 2026 budget to:
👉 reduce vulnerability to oil price fluctuations
👉 control fiscal deficits and public spending
👉 diversify national income sources
👉 and maintain economic stability amid regional uncertainty
Frank26
What I find to be the trigger, the lynch pin to all of this is the HCL...The HCL definitely has to have a new rate.
They would have used 1300 or any sanctioned rate inside the last 20 years by now...But they never did...Because they are talking about it on a daily basis,...going to pass many of the laws of the HCL,...have not used any sanctioned rates...we're going to see a new rate.
---
Many investors continue to focus on banking reforms, international agreements, foreign investment, and economic development. While all of these are important, what stands out as the true trigger—the lynchpin connecting everything together—is the Hydrocarbon Law (HCL).
Why?
Because for more than two decades Iraq has debated, revised, delayed, and renegotiated the framework governing the distribution of oil and gas revenues between Baghdad, the Kurdistan Region, and the Iraqi people. Yet despite all the discussions, governments, and parliamentary sessions, one question remains:
Why has Iraq never fully implemented the HCL using the existing exchange rates that have existed over the last 20 years?
If the current sanctioned rates were sufficient for a long-term solution, one could argue that the law would have been finalized and activated years ago. Iraq has operated under multiple exchange rate environments, including rates around 1170, 1190, 1460, and now 1300 IQD per dollar. Yet the HCL remains one of the most discussed and unfinished pieces of legislation in modern Iraqi history.
What makes this noteworthy is that Iraqi officials continue to discuss the HCL almost daily. Parliament continues to revisit key provisions. Committees continue negotiations. Political blocs continue to emphasize its importance. Despite all the delays, the issue has never disappeared.
That raises an interesting possibility:
What if the final implementation of the HCL requires an economic environment different from the one Iraq has operated under for the last two decades?
The HCL is not simply an oil law. It is fundamentally about revenue sharing, citizen benefits, provincial allocations, regional agreements, and long-term economic stability. Every distribution formula inside the law ultimately depends on the value and purchasing power attached to those revenues.
🏛️🇮🇶 2026 BUDGET: IS IRAQ BUILDING THE FOUNDATION FOR A STRONGER DINAR? 💰📈
Iraq's Parliament has revealed the four key pillars for the 2026 budget, and while most people are focused on the $60 per barrel oil benchmark, there may be a much bigger story unfolding beneath the surface.
The four pillars are:
✅ Setting a conservative oil price of $60 per barrel.
✅ Rationalizing public spending.
✅ Increasing non-oil revenues.
✅ Reducing dependence on oil as the primary source of budget financing.
At first glance, this appears to be a simple fiscal strategy designed to protect Iraq from oil market volatility, regional tensions, and uncertainty surrounding global energy markets. However, when viewed alongside Iraq's broader reform agenda, the implications become much more significant.
For years, Iraq has been working to modernize its banking sector, strengthen its financial system, attract foreign investment, improve international compliance standards, expand private-sector growth, and diversify its economy beyond oil. These are not the actions of a country focused solely on short-term survival. They are the actions of a nation attempting to build a sustainable long-term economic foundation.
What stands out most is the repeated emphasis on reducing dependence on oil revenues. This has become one of the central themes of Iraq's economic transformation. A country that generates stronger non-oil revenues gains greater financial stability, better control of its budget, and increased resilience against external shocks.
Why does this matter?
Because strong currencies are typically supported by strong economic fundamentals.
A nation that reduces deficits, diversifies revenue streams, strengthens its banking system, protects sovereign assets, and expands economic activity creates conditions that are more supportive of monetary stability and future currency strength.
The article itself does not mention a revaluation of the Iraqi dinar. However, many observers view these reforms as part of the foundation that would be necessary before any major monetary change could realistically occur.
This raises an important question:
🤔 If Iraq is working to diversify its economy, strengthen its financial institutions, resolve legacy financial issues, reduce debt risks, protect sovereign funds, advance the HCL framework, and lessen dependence on oil revenues, what is the ultimate destination of all these reforms?
Some believe the answer could eventually include a stronger and more internationally integrated Iraqi dinar.
Whether that means a future revaluation remains to be seen. But what is increasingly difficult to ignore is that Iraq continues to focus on the exact economic pillars that support long-term monetary strength: fiscal discipline, economic diversification, financial modernization, and sovereign economic independence.
In her interview with Al-Sabah, she indicated that there are discussions within the committee regarding ways to reduce the financial deficit in light of declining global expectations for oil prices, warning that any change in the prices of oil derivatives may gradually affect the living conditions of citizens.
In the same vein, Dr. Ali Al-Azirjawi, a member of the State of Law Coalition, called for the adoption of an emergency plan similar to the Food Security Law should the 2026 budget not be approved within the constitutional