DINAR REVALUATION INSIGHTS: 👉 Stability is the foundation for any future monetary transformation-Regional conflict strains Iraq’s credit standing

 Shafaq News- Baghdad

Moody’s Investors Service on Saturday downgraded Iraq’s outlook to negative, citing rising regional tensions and increasing risks to the country’s oil-dependent economy and export flows.

The agency warned that Iraq’s reliance on oil exports leaves it vulnerable to disruptions in key maritime routes, particularly the Strait of Hormuz, through which about 90% of Iraqi crude is transported. It added that any interruption could quickly tighten state revenues and foreign currency inflows.

Although the Iraqi Ministry of Oil indicated that oil exports from the country’s southern provinces have resumed after more than 45 days of suspension, Moody’s expects it will take time for export levels to return to normal, as the US-Iranian temporary ceasefire implemented on April 8 continues to hold.

The agency previously reported an 80% drop in Baghdad’s oil production, noting that the decline pushed crude inventories to elevated levels. It also kept Iraq’s credit rating unchanged at “Caa1,” a level reflecting high credit risk.

https://shafaq.com/en/Economy/Regional-conflict-strains-Iraq-s-credit-standing

---

🧠 Dinar Revaluation Insights – Key Theme: Stability in Iraq

Now we clearly see why the keyword “stability” is so critical for the Iraqi government.

Regional tensions—factors that are external to Iraq’s internal policy—have repeatedly shown how quickly they can affect:

• market confidence
• exchange rate pressure
• investor perception
• and overall economic sentiment

This highlights a fundamental reality:

👉 Iraq’s economic and monetary strategy is highly sensitive to external geopolitical shocks.

---

📊 Analytical Insight

From a “Dinar Revaluation Insights” perspective, stability is not just a political preference—it is a structural requirement.

If Iraq is considering any long-term monetary strengthening or future currency reform, it must first ensure:

• strong internal control mechanisms
• reduced exposure to external volatility
• consistent fiscal and monetary discipline
• and sustained confidence in the financial system

---

⚖️ Key Interpretation

This is why the government prioritizes stability over rapid change.

Because in an environment like Iraq’s:

• instability increases currency speculation
• volatility weakens trust in the dinar
• external shocks can disrupt economic planning

---

📌 Core Insight

👉 Stability is not the end goal—it is the foundation for any future monetary transformation.

TEXAS SNAKE: 🚨 Breaking: Multiple Confirmations Signal Imminent Redemption — “Codes Entered,” (ENGLISH & SPANISH)

 Saturday, April 18, 2026

Texas Snake says:

Some positive and promising news has been released tonight, giving us even more confidence that we are close to our redemption. I will report more as soon as I learn additional details. God bless you all.

Texas Snake 🐍 posted:

An unexpected CC has just announced that there may be more news coming.

Texas Snake 🐍 Post #2:

CC is just another confirmation that the codes have been entered by the military and to stay alert. That makes 4 confirmations.

Texas Snake 🐍 Post #3

SPANISH

 Sábado 18 Abril 2026

Texas Snake : Dice

Alguna noticia positiva y prometedora se ha publicado esta noche, lo que nos asegura aún más que estamos a punto de nuestra redención; informaré más en cuanto pueda tan pronto como aprenda más. Que Dios los bendiga a todos.

Texas Snake publicó

CC inesperado acaba de anunciar que quizás haya más noticias.

Texas Snake publicación #2

CC es solo otra confirmación de que los códigos han sido ingresados por el ejército y de mantenerse alerta. Son 4 confirmaciones.

Texas Snake publicación #3

IRAQ IS Establishing a Sovereign Fund for Economic Stability WOW!! @DINARREVALUATION ​

 

Is there an American and an Iranian “veto” on the second Sudanese term, or is it a fabricated political narrative?

  Is there an American and an Iranian “veto” on the second Sudanese term, or is it a fabricated political narrative?

 Some claim there is an Iranian veto on the nomination of Mohammed Shia al-Sudani for the premiership of the new government, and that there is also an American veto on the same issue, but this is untrue. According to observers, the Iranians are too bold to conceal their position, and if they have an opinion or reservation, they do not reject it outright, but rather express their stance indirectly. This has not happened at all with al-Sudani; on the contrary, there are numerous positive signals coming from the Iranian side that are in Mohammed Shia al-Sudani's favor.

Similarly, the Americans are the most outspoken and direct in declaring their position, and no one is clearer in expressing their political stance on such an issue. Certainly, no negative statement or insinuation regarding al-Sudani's premiership came from the Washington government or its representatives. In contrast, we find a clear American statement against al-Maliki's nomination, issued personally by US President Donald Trump, in which he unequivocally expressed his rejection of Abu Israa assuming the premiership for a third time.

The Americans, especially President Trump, feel no hesitation in declaring their position against any official in the world.

For example, their stance on the government in Venezuela was clear, and Trump himself stated it publicly on numerous occasions.

The Americans undoubtedly have many ways of expressing their position, including through the American ambassador to Iraq, who speaks frankly, or the chargé d'affaires, or through Trump's envoys and representatives. 

But this never happened in the matter of Al-Sudani’s nomination. Those who promote this lie are “promoting it for purely political and self-serving purposes that have no relation to reality and truth.” The head of the Reconstruction and Development Bloc, Bahaa Al-Araji, said it frankly: The American veto on Al-Sudani is a clear lie.

Yes, America has no veto, ban, or objection to al-Sudani. The rumors and propaganda spread by some forces within the Coordination Framework are a blatant lie and nothing more than a deliberate attempt to confuse the situation. When they claim there is a veto on al-Maliki and a veto on al-Sudani, they are pursuing a self-serving objective: to present a "third candidate"

—a candidate carefully tailored to their own interests and utilitarian needs. 

Indeed, these rumors are being circulated by certain parties seeking to bring in a weak prime minister who can be controlled and manipulated as they please.

As for Iran, it has no reservations about al-Sudani.

Tehran certainly knows al-Sudani's nature better than anyone else, and is aware of his skill in keeping Iraq out of the conflict zone, and his ability to maintain a neutral stance, specifically on the safe path. This is a point the Iranians value and are very concerned with. Therefore, officials in Tehran have sent several positive and favorable signals to the Iraqi government and its president, al-Sudani.

Iran is also well aware of the al-Sudani government's supportive stance towards the Lebanese people, the resistance, and Hezbollah, and its prevention of any leniency or inclination by any party within the government towards any axis hostile to Iran or its allies.

Therefore, the American and Iranian veto card is a false card, and whoever promotes it as a rumor should look for another card.

Then how can this strange paradox be believed, which says that the Sudanese are facing a veto from both opposing sides together? 

Logic means standing with America or standing with Iran, and this means that the veto will come from one of them and not from both of them together.. as they cannot possibly agree on one position.

Therefore, some parties within the coordination framework must look for excuses or justifications other than this narrative, which, according to many observers, has lost credibility in the eyes of a public that is now more open than ever!  link

FRANK26: banks are no longer saying it's a scam...

  Frank26 

Pretty much this year around February and March...banks are no longer saying it's a scam...

 They showed the Iraqi citizens...a 25,000 note and a 25 note in front of it [See Image Below].  That's a lower note.  I don't know if that's a new one.  It could be an old one.  But they're telling the Iraqi citizens your 25k note is going to become 25 because you're going to have purchasing power added to that 25...  

 The lifting of the three zeros of the Iraqi dinar has officially started...This is an amazing day for the monetary reform...

What they need to do now is add value to the currency in order to remove the three zero notes...In doing so it will introduce lower notes with purchasing power because they will have that power added by a different exchange rate.

FRANK26…4-16-26….THE EVIDENCE

SANDY INGRAM: 🚨 Iraq “Deleting the Zeros” Explained: What It Really Means for the Iraqi Dinar

Sandy Ingram  

 All of a sudden the Iraqi government and the Central Bank of Iraq is now openly discussing 'deleting the zeros.'...

How will that affect your Iraqi dinar investment? ...The phrase sounds dramatic and many people believe the currency will suddenly become more valuable, but that is not what Iraq is saying. 

 In simple terms, deleting the zeros is a technical change to how the currency looks, not a change in how much the currency is actually worth. 

 When Iraq talked about 'removing the zeros' they mean a process called redenomination.  

This means large numbers in the currency are reduced to smaller  amounts. 

 For example, 1,000 old dinars would become 1 new dinar.  Even though the number looks smaller, the value stays the same...The total value in your pocket does not change...There was no information in the news article about when Iraq plans to delete the zeros...We can only hope these are steps toward a currency adjustment.