Some positive and promising news has been released tonight, giving us even more confidence that we are close to our redemption. I will report more as soon as I learn additional details. God bless you all.
Texas Snake 馃悕 posted:
An unexpected CC has just announced that there may be more news coming.
Texas Snake 馃悕 Post #2:
CC is just another confirmation that the codes have been entered by the military and to stay alert. That makes 4 confirmations.
Texas Snake 馃悕 Post #3
SPANISH
S谩bado 18 Abril 2026
Texas Snake : Dice
Alguna noticia positiva y prometedora se ha publicado esta noche, lo que nos asegura a煤n m谩s que estamos a punto de nuestra redenci贸n; informar茅 m谩s en cuanto pueda tan pronto como aprenda m谩s. Que Dios los bendiga a todos.
Texas Snake public贸
CC inesperado acaba de anunciar que quiz谩s haya m谩s noticias.
Texas Snake publicaci贸n #2
CC es solo otra confirmaci贸n de que los c贸digos han sido ingresados por el ej茅rcito y de mantenerse alerta. Son 4 confirmaciones.
Is there an American and an Iranian “veto” on the second Sudanese term, or is it a fabricated political narrative?
Some claim there is an Iranian veto on the nomination of Mohammed Shia al-Sudani for the premiership of the new government, and that there is also an American veto on the same issue, but this is untrue. According to observers, the Iranians are too bold to conceal their position, and if they have an opinion or reservation, they do not reject it outright, but rather express their stance indirectly. This has not happened at all with al-Sudani; on the contrary, there are numerous positive signals coming from the Iranian side that are in Mohammed Shia al-Sudani's favor.
Similarly, the Americans are the most outspoken and direct in declaring their position, and no one is clearer in expressing their political stance on such an issue. Certainly, no negative statement or insinuation regarding al-Sudani's premiership came from the Washington government or its representatives. In contrast, we find a clear American statement against al-Maliki's nomination, issued personally by US President Donald Trump, in which he unequivocally expressed his rejection of Abu Israa assuming the premiership for a third time.
The Americans, especially President Trump, feel no hesitation in declaring their position against any official in the world.
For example, their stance on the government in Venezuela was clear, and Trump himself stated it publicly on numerous occasions.
The Americans undoubtedly have many ways of expressing their position, including through the American ambassador to Iraq, who speaks frankly, or the charg茅 d'affaires, or through Trump's envoys and representatives.
But this never happened in the matter of Al-Sudani’s nomination. Those who promote this lie are “promoting it for purely political and self-serving purposes that have no relation to reality and truth.” The head of the Reconstruction and Development Bloc, Bahaa Al-Araji, said it frankly: The American veto on Al-Sudani is a clear lie.
Yes, America has no veto, ban, or objection to al-Sudani. The rumors and propaganda spread by some forces within the Coordination Framework are a blatant lie and nothing more than a deliberate attempt to confuse the situation. When they claim there is a veto on al-Maliki and a veto on al-Sudani, they are pursuing a self-serving objective: to present a "third candidate"
—a candidate carefully tailored to their own interests and utilitarian needs.
Indeed, these rumors are being circulated by certain parties seeking to bring in a weak prime minister who can be controlled and manipulated as they please.
As for Iran, it has no reservations about al-Sudani.
Tehran certainly knows al-Sudani's nature better than anyone else, and is aware of his skill in keeping Iraq out of the conflict zone, and his ability to maintain a neutral stance, specifically on the safe path. This is a point the Iranians value and are very concerned with. Therefore, officials in Tehran have sent several positive and favorable signals to the Iraqi government and its president, al-Sudani.
Iran is also well aware of the al-Sudani government's supportive stance towards the Lebanese people, the resistance, and Hezbollah, and its prevention of any leniency or inclination by any party within the government towards any axis hostile to Iran or its allies.
Therefore, the American and Iranian veto card is a false card, and whoever promotes it as a rumor should look for another card.
Then how can this strange paradox be believed, which says that the Sudanese are facing a veto from both opposing sides together?
Logic means standing with America or standing with Iran, and this means that the veto will come from one of them and not from both of them together.. as they cannot possibly agree on one position.
Therefore, some parties within the coordination framework must look for excuses or justifications other than this narrative, which, according to many observers, has lost credibility in the eyes of a public that is now more open than ever! link
Pretty much this year around February and March...banks are no longer saying it's a scam...
They showed the Iraqi citizens...a 25,000 note and a 25 note in front of it [See Image Below]. That's a lower note. I don't know if that's a new one.
It could be an old one. But they're telling the Iraqi citizens your 25k note is going to become 25 because you're going to have purchasing power added to that 25...
The lifting of the three zeros of the Iraqi dinar has officially started...This is an amazing day for the monetary reform...
What they need to do now is add value to the currency in order to remove the three zero notes...In doing so it will introduce lower notes with purchasing power because they will have that power added by a different exchange rate.
All of a sudden the Iraqi government and the Central Bank of Iraq is now openly discussing 'deleting the zeros.'...
How will that affect your Iraqi dinar investment? ...The phrase sounds dramatic and many people believe the currency will suddenly become more valuable, but that is not what Iraq is saying.
In simple terms, deleting the zeros is a technical change to how the currency looks, not a change in how much the currency is actually worth.
When Iraq talked about 'removing the zeros' they mean a process called redenomination.
This means large numbers in the currency are reduced to smaller amounts.
For example, 1,000 old dinars would become 1 new dinar. Even though the number looks smaller, the value stays the same...The total value in your pocket does not change...There was no information in the news article about when Iraq plans to delete the zeros...We can only hope these are steps toward a currency adjustment.
馃洟️ Basra Oil Contracts Move to Digital Dinar: Iraq’s Quiet Shift Away From Dollar Dependency
馃摪 Breaking Narrative: What Is Happening in Basra?
Recent reports indicate that oil contracts in Basra are transitioning toward digital dinar-based settlement systems, signaling a gradual reduction in reliance on the U.S. dollar within Iraq’s most critical economic sector.
This shift is being described as part of a broader effort to modernize Iraq’s financial system and strengthen monetary sovereignty through digital infrastructure.
Key elements of this transition include:
Oil-related contracts increasingly denominated in IQD-based digital systems
Reduced dependency on dollar settlement mechanisms
Integration with emerging central bank digital initiatives
Movement toward programmable financial transactions
While still developing, this shift is being closely watched as a structural evolution in Iraq’s monetary framework.
馃搳 What This Could Mean: Speculative Bullish Analysis for the Dinar
馃Л 1. Oil sector integration = real currency utility
If Iraq begins settling parts of its oil economy in dinar-based systems, it transforms the IQD from a passive currency into an active economic instrument.
In bullish terms, this means:
The dinar gains functional demand inside key industries
It becomes more than just a domestic retail currency
It enters the core flow of national revenue systems
馃搱 Currencies with real utility tend to gain long-term structural strength.
Reducing dollar usage in strategic sectors like oil can lead to:
Higher internal demand for IQD
Reduced dollar circulation in domestic transactions
Greater reliance on national currency settlement systems
馃憠 In optimistic scenarios, this creates a foundation forlong-term currency stabilization and strengthening.
馃彟 3. Digital infrastructure increases monetary control
A digital settlement system allows for:
Real-time tracking of financial flows
Better liquidity management by the central bank
Reduced inefficiencies in cross-border and domestic payments
Stronger enforcement of monetary policy
馃搳 In bullish economic models, this type of infrastructure is a key step toward financial modernization.
馃攧 4. Narrative shift: from “restricted currency” to “functional sovereign currency”
If the dinar is increasingly used in:
Oil contracts
Government-linked financial systems
Digital payment frameworks
Then perception begins to shift:
馃憠 From a controlled or limited-use currency 馃憠 To a functional sovereign currency embedded in real economic activity
馃搱 And in markets, perception often precedes valuation changes.
馃殌 5. Long-term optimistic scenario for the IQD
If this trend expands and stabilizes over time, potential outcomes could include:
Increased domestic reliance on the dinar
Reduced dollar dominance in key sectors
Stronger monetary policy control by Iraq’s central bank
Improved financial system efficiency
Gradual strengthening of currency fundamentals
馃搳 Result (hypothetical long-term view): A more stable and structurally supported Iraqi dinar within its domestic economy.
⚖️ Important reality check
Even in a bullish interpretation:
This is not an immediate revaluation signal
It is a financial infrastructure development process
External currency value still depends on global market forces, reserves, inflation, and geopolitical stability
馃 Key Takeaway
Basra’s reported shift toward digital dinar oil contracts reflects Iraq’s broader effort to reduce dollar dependency and strengthen monetary sovereignty. “While this supports long-term structural strength of the dinar, it does lay the groundwork for a potential currency revaluation.”
馃挰 Q&A Section
❓ What is the digital dinar in Iraq?
The digital dinar refers to electronic settlement systems that use the Iraqi dinar for transactions, especially in large-scale or government-linked operations.
❓ Why is Iraq reducing dollar dependency?
To increase monetary sovereignty, strengthen internal financial control, and reduce exposure to external currency pressures.
❓ Does this mean the Iraqi dinar will revalue soon?
No. This is a structural modernization process, not a confirmed currency revaluation event yet.
❓ How does this affect the Iraqi economy long-term?
It may improve financial stability, increase internal currency usage, and strengthen monetary policy control.
馃敟 Final Insight
If sustained, this shift suggests Iraq is slowly building the financial infrastructure needed for a stronger, more independent currency system.
Not a sudden transformation — but a long-term structural repositioning of the dinar within its own economy.
public贸