THE IRANIAN FRAMEWORK: OUR ORDERS COME EXCLUSIVELY FROM IRAN, AND WE DO NOT RESPECT AMERICAN DIRECTIVES.
(Mnt Goat: note how they now call it the Iranian Framework and not the Coordination Framework….)
Uday Abdul-Hadi, a member of the Coordination Framework, confirmed on Sunday that the decision to support Nouri al-Maliki as the Framework’s candidate to form the next government is irrevocable.
He indicated that they are awaiting the results of today’s session before officially nominating him. Abdul-Hadi stated in a press interview, “The Coordination Framework’s meeting held yesterday evening was clear in its statement, affirming its support for the nomination of Nouri al-Maliki to form the next government, given that the Framework’s forces represent the largest bloc within the Iraqi parliament.”
He added, “The Coordination Framework is awaiting the results of today’s session dedicated to electing the President of the Republic. Once the position is decided, the winning candidate will be identified, and Nouri al-Maliki’s name will be officially put forward to form the next government within the specified constitutional timeframe.”
He pointed out that “all reports of disagreements within the Coordination Framework are inaccurate,” noting that “the Framework’s statement was clear in its commitment to national and historical responsibility and its refusal to allow any party to interfere in determining the selection process for the Prime Minister, as it is a purely sovereign decision.”
(Mnt Goat: Oh…. but Iran is not interfering only the US? )
Let’s ask the question many are afraid to ask out loud:
What happens if Nouri al-Maliki actually gets voted in as Prime Minister again?
I do not want to paint a picture of gloom and doom. In fact, I strongly believe this will NOT happen. Iraq already lived through Maliki’s first eight disastrous years, and the memory of that period is still fresh — politically, economically, and socially.
But understanding what is at stake explains why there is so much resistance to his return.
Maliki’s First Eight Years: A Reminder Iraq Doesn’t Need
What would happen if Maliki becomes prime minister again?
A return of Nouri al-Maliki as prime minister would likely trigger international isolation, economic pressure, potential sanctions, and a delay or collapse of any Iraqi dinar revaluation plans.
Q&A: People Also Ask
Q: Would the US accept Maliki as prime minister?
A: All evidence suggests strong American opposition and potential economic retaliation.
Q: Could the Iraqi dinar collapse under Maliki?
A: Reports indicate the dinar would be vulnerable to severe pressure under sanctions or dollar restrictions.
Q: Is America still controlling Iraq’s oil money?
A: Yes. Oil revenues continue to pass through US-controlled financial systems.
Q: Does Maliki’s return affect the RV?
A: Yes. A Maliki premiership would likely block or delay any RV.
What will happen if Maliki should get voted in as the prime minister?
I don’t want to paint a picture of gloom and doom because I do not believe this will happen as Maliki will not get in again as prime minister. His first eight years were disastrous, as we all know. Please go read the following articles and this will help you understand what Iraq is in for should/if Maliki regain power:
“ADHERENCE” TO MALIKI AND AMERICAN REJECTION… WARNING OF SANCTIONS AND ECONOMIC REPERCUSSIONS AMID INTERNATIONAL ISOLATION”
International isolation again is the last thing Iraq needs just when they were on the verge of completing the necessary reforms to move to the international arena.
“AMONG THEM THE COLLAPSE OF THE DINAR… REPORT: THREE ECONOMIC CARDS IN TRUMP’S HAND TO “UNDERMINE” MALIKI’S RULE”
A press report published by the Al-Sharq Economic website on Thursday, January 29, 2026, identified what it described as “economic pressure points” that US President Donald Trump could use to “undermine” Nouri al-Maliki’s rule, should he assume the premiership”. Does this sound like the US would approve the RV anytime soon if Maliki gets back in the premiership?
“LEARN ABOUT THE REASONS FOR AMERICA’S “GUARDIANSHIP” OVER IRAQ… AND THE CONSEQUENCES THAT AWAIT US IF THIS PROTECTION IS LIFTED.”
Despite more than 23 years having passed since the fall of Saddam Hussein’s regime, Iraqi oil revenues remain channeled through the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. This arrangement is viewed within Iraq as a complex mix of legal “protection” and financial “guardianship” that grants Washington significant influence over economic decision-making in Baghdad. Although most of the legal foundations that originally established this mechanism have expired, the United States effectively still controls the flow of dollars that fund the Iraqi budget through a combination of executive orders, protectionist measures, and strict oversight of dollar flows into and out of Iraq. With Trump’s threats to cut “aid” to Iraq—which is practically understood as a threat to cut off its dollar supply— read the article to examine the implications.
“ADHERENCE” TO MALIKI AND AMERICAN REJECTION… WARNING OF SANCTIONS AND ECONOMIC REPERCUSSIONS AMID INTERNATIONAL ISOLATION”
The Coordination Framework’s “adherence” to its candidate for Prime Minister, Nouri al-Maliki, has sparked various reactions and warnings of economic repercussions that could affect the future of the Iraqi dinar, in addition to the possibility of international isolation, in light of the declared American rejection of al-Maliki assuming the presidency of the next Iraqi government.
In this context, Salam al-Zubaidi, spokesman for the “Victory” coalition, said in a statement to the “Al-Jabal” platform that “there is a clear divergence of views within the forces of the Coordination Framework regarding proceeding with the nomination of Nouri al-Maliki for the premiership, and this divergence came in the wake of American objections and concerns related to the possibility of imposing American sanctions that may negatively affect the political and economic situation in Iraq.”
Al-Zubaidi explained that “some parties within the coordination framework see the need to take international repercussions into account, in order to avoid any measures that may harm the supreme national interest, while other parties adhere to their political options as a purely internal matter.”
Al-Zubaidi added, “At the same time, we affirm our categorical rejection of any external interference in the government formation process, whether from regional or international parties. The decision to choose the prime minister must be purely Iraqi and stem from the will of the political forces and the constitutional process only.”
The spokesman for the “Victory Coalition” stressed that “preserving the sovereignty of national decision-making and prioritizing the interest of Iraq above any other considerations should be the basis at this sensitive stage, and therefore there should be a responsible internal dialogue that leads to a consensus that serves the stability of the country and its future.”
In this context: Wilson, addressing Maliki: You are insulting Trump… Try your luck and see what happens.
In contrast, political researcher Mohammed Ali Al-Hakim warned of what he described as “the danger of insisting on proceeding with the nomination of Al-Maliki.”
Al-Hakim told Al-Jabal platform, “We must be wary of the danger of some parties within the coordination framework insisting on nominating Nouri al-Maliki for the premiership, given the declared American rejection of this nomination. This path may open the door to extremely dangerous political, economic, and security repercussions for Iraq.”
Al-Hakim explained that “ignoring the American position cannot be treated as a marginal detail, and the United States is still an influential player in the international scene, and it has real tools of pressure that it may use if it feels that its interests are threatened or that the next Iraqi government will move towards confrontational policies.”
He added that “the most dangerous thing that Iraq may face if it insists on this nomination is the possibility of imposing economic or financial sanctions, or restricting international banking transactions, which will directly affect the exchange rate of the dinar, investment activity, and the government’s ability to meet its internal and external obligations.”
He continued, “Iraq is still recovering from the effects of many years of isolation, sanctions, and conflicts, and any return to a state of tension with the international community would be a serious setback to the path of openness achieved in recent years.We must be careful that international isolation does not begin with big decisions, but rather with accumulated political positions that weaken the confidence of international partners in the Iraqi state.”
Al-Hakim stressed that “rejecting foreign interference in the formation of governments is a legitimate sovereign principle, but it does not mean ignoring the international balance of power or jumping over the complex political and economic reality that Iraq is experiencing. The logic of wisdom and national consensus must prevail, and a figure capable of managing the stage with the least amount of external clashes must be chosen.”
The political analyst concluded his remarks by saying, “The current stage requires responsible decisions that put Iraq’s higher interest above partisan and narrow calculations, and we must be wary that insisting on controversial options may push the country into new crises, the price of which will be paid first and foremost by the Iraqi citizen.”
More News… Maliki’s Nomination Suddenly “Under Review”
Under mounting pressure from Washington, reports emerged that the Coordination Framework is now consideringwithdrawing Nouri al-Maliki’s nomination.
According to Iraqi parliamentary sources:
Scenario 1: Push Maliki forward and let Parliament decide
Scenario 2: Maliki withdraws in exchange for choosing a replacement
⏳ They allegedly have until Sunday, when a president would be elected and the largest bloc tasked with forming the government.
👉 Key word: considering ❌ Not done ❌ Not confirmed
This is positioning — not resolution.
More News… US Treasury Tightens the Noose on Iran
The US Treasury Department announced new sanctions:
7 individuals
2 companies
All linked directly to Iran
This move comes amid:
Rising US military presence in Middle Eastern waters
Escalating economic pressure on Tehran
💡 This matters because Iran’s grip on Iraqi politics depends on money, logistics, and influence — all now under increasing strain.
Constitutional Deadlines: Ignored, Twisted, and Abused
Let’s revisit what the Iraqi Constitution actually says:
Article 72 (Second/B): The President of the Republic must be elected within 30 days of the first session of the new Parliament.
That deadline already passed last Thursday.
So why are they still pretending this is normal?
Because the political crisis overrides the constitution — at least in practice.
Between “Text” and “Reality”
One Iraqi article put it perfectly:
“The postponement of the parliamentary session scheduled to elect the president opens a deeper debate about whether constitutional timeframes are still respected.”
Translation? The constitution exists — until it becomes inconvenient.
And we all know what the crisis is.
One word: Maliki
Why Did the Coordination Framework Send a Delegation to Erbil?
Another key article: “Coordination Framework Delegation Heads to Erbil to Finalize Deal on Iraq’s Top Posts.”
Notice something important?
They weren’t just negotiating the presidency — They were negotiating the premiership.
That tells us everything.
The Kurdish Factor: The Real Power Broker
Let’s be honest:
The Kurds do not dislike Maliki
They HATE him
And for good reason.
Maliki:
Threatened Kurdistan militarily
Attempted to seize control of Kurdish oil
Nearly ignited a civil war between Baghdad and Erbil
Iran wants:
Kurdish oil
Kurdish revenue streams
Strategic leverage
Maliki is their man.
So Where Was Maliki in the Erbil Delegation?
Here’s who attended:
Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani
Deputy Speaker Mohsen al-Mandalawi
Badr Organization leader Hadi al-Ameri
👀 Notice who’s missing?
No Maliki.
That absence speaks louder than any press release.
The Maliki Propaganda Machine Is in Overdrive
Why the desperation?
Some believe Maliki knows criminal charges are coming. Others understand the truth:
👉 His legal troubles exist because he’s trying to regain power.
And now the mask is fully off.
From Coordination Framework to Iranian Framework
Take a look at this headline:
“THE IRANIAN FRAMEWORK: OUR ORDERS COME EXCLUSIVELY FROM IRAN, AND WE DO NOT RESPECT AMERICAN DIRECTIVES.”
They don’t even hide it anymore.
They dare to accuse the US of interference — while openly declaring loyalty to Iran.
The hypocrisy is staggering.
A Familiar Pattern: Iraq Is Not Alone
What’s happening in Iraq mirrors what many nations have experienced:
Election manipulation
Foreign influence
Weaponized legal systems
Media-driven propaganda
Power is preserved at all costs.
Democracy is just the branding.
So What Happens Next?
Here’s the reality:
The election cycle will not move forward until:
Political pressure forces compliance with constitutional deadlines, or
The Maliki crisis is resolved
There are only two paths:
Maliki withdraws
Parliament blocks him during ratification
Either way, time is not on his side.
And yes — the Kurds are controlling the clock.
Featured Snippet
Why is Iraq’s presidential election delayed?
Iraq’s presidential election is delayed due to political deadlock caused by the Coordination Framework’s insistence on nominating Nouri al-Maliki, despite constitutional deadlines and strong Kurdish opposition.
Q&A: People Also Ask
Q: Has Iraq violated its constitutional election deadlines?
A: Yes. The deadline to elect the President has already passed.
Q: Is Maliki still the leading candidate for Prime Minister?
A: Officially yes, but politically his position is weakening rapidly.
Q: Why are the Kurds blocking progress?
A: They strongly oppose Maliki due to past threats, conflicts, and centralization of power.
Q: How does this affect the RV?
A: Government formation must stabilize before meaningful monetary reform can proceed.
Final Thoughts: Read Between the Lines
Deadlines are missed. Sessions are canceled. Delegations exclude Maliki. Sanctions tighten around Iran.
Nothing here is accidental.
The pieces are moving — and not in Maliki’s favor.
PARLIAMENT SETS NEXT SUNDAY AS THE DATE FOR THE SESSION TO ELECT THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC
The media department of the House of Representatives announced today, Friday, that next Sunday has been set as the date for holding a session to elect the President of the Republic.
Agenda for Session No. 7, Sunday, February 1, 2026
Department of Affairs Parliamentary Session
Recitation of verses from the Holy Quran First: Taking of the constitutional oath by some members of parliament.
Second: Election of the President of the Republic.
The session starts at eleven o’clock in the morning.
(This event did not happen!)
More news….
THE COORDINATING FRAMEWORK IS CONSIDERING WITHDRAWING AL-MALIKI’S NOMINATION UNDER PRESSURE FROM WASHINGTON.
An Iraqi parliamentary source stated that the coordination framework is studying options for dealing with Washington’s rejection of Nouri al-Maliki’s nomination, including the possibility of his withdrawal .
The US-based Al-Hurra channel, in a report followed by Al-Sa’a network, quoted the parliamentary source as saying that “there are two scenarios being discussed within the coalition: the first is to proceed with nominating Maliki and leave the final decision to the parliamentary blocs, and the second is for Maliki to withdraw in exchange for being given the opportunity to name an alternative figure .”
He added that “the framework has until Sunday, which is the likely date for holding a parliamentary session to elect a new president of the republic, who in turn will task the candidate of the largest bloc, which is the coordinating framework, with forming the government .”
(They may have considered it but did not yet do it)
More news….
THE US TREASURY IMPOSES NEW SANCTIONS ON INDIVIDUALS AND COMPANIES LINKED TO IRAN.
The US Treasury Department announced on Friday that it has added seven individuals and two entities to its list of sanctions related to Iran.
The US Treasury Department said it had imposed a new package of sanctions on Iran, targeting companies and individuals, including seven people along with a number of companies. These additional sanctions came as part of escalating economic pressure on Tehran amid rising US military buildup in Middle Eastern waters.
STATUS OF THE RV
Here we are at yet another week of waiting in anticipation to see what happens in forming the next Iraqi government. We are seeing articles about the deadline coming close for electing the next president. But we know that this deadline has already passed last Thursday and even read the verbiage from the constitution on it. Here it is again:
The Iraqi Constitution, in Article (72/Second/B), stipulates that the President of the Republic must be elected within (30) days of the first session of the new Parliament, to ensure the continuity of legitimacy and prevent a power vacuum.
So, more deadlines are nearing. Do the politicians even take these deadlines serious anymore? In the article titled “BETWEEN “TEXT” AND “REALITY”: POSTPONING THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PUTS THE IRAQI CONSTITUTION TO THE TEST OF TIME LIMITS.” I will quote from the article:
“With the postponement of the parliamentary session scheduled to elect the president, the current crisis transcends the bounds of a mere political procedure, opening a deeper debate about the constitution’s place in the Iraqi equation and the extent to which the timeframes it stipulates for the transfer of power are respected.” What the author is really telling us the constitutional deadlines must be respected but also there is a crisis that must be solved and sometimes these things take time, more time than is given in the constitution. And we all know what this crisis is, don’t we. I will sum it all up in one word “Maliki”.
In the article titled “COORDINATION FRAMEWORK DELEGATION HEADS TO ERBIL TO FINALIZE DEAL ON IRAQ’S TOP POSTS”. So why do you think they sent a delegation to Erbil? Of course, common sense tells us why as in the article it says “Talks aim to settle the presidency and premiership as the Iraqi parliament convenes to complete Iraq’s constitutional entitlements.” Did they say also to settle the premiership? Did you read this too? So, this article ties together for us the delay in selecting the president not caused by not having a candidate for the presidency (which is a Kurd responsibility) but by the determination of the Coordination Framework in nominating Maliki for the premiership.
In the following statement it shows us how much the Coordination Framework knows the Kurds dislike Maliki (or should I say HATES him) yet they still want him as their candidate? Why is this? Yes, it is the Iranians in the Iraqi government that want the Kurdistan oil and the revenues it can generate for Iran. Remember Maliki was all set to attack Kurdistan when he was the prime minister only he could not get the equipment he needed. He wanted a civil war of GOI vs Kurds.
So, when they don’t even include Maliki in their delegation to Erbil then what does it tell us? I quote from the article – “A senior-level delegation from Iraq’s Shiite-led Coordination Framework is scheduled to visit Erbil on Sunday as part of accelerated political efforts to complete Iraq’s constitutional entitlements, particularly the unresolved posts of president and prime minister. The delegation is expected to include Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, Deputy Speaker of Parliament Mohsen al-Mandalawi, and Badr Organization leader Hadi al-Ameri, who will meet with senior leaders of the Kurdistan Region.”
Oh…. did the author just tell us the delegation is expected to include Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani and so where is Nori al-Maliki, peanut-head man in this delegation?
We must be diligent on how we read these articles coming from Iraq. The Maliki propaganda machine is moving desperately to get him back in office. Some say that he is desperate because he knows what is coming for him in criminal charges. But we know that these charges are only coming as a result of his flagrant move to take control again. Folks, it is now so obvious who he is working for and it’s not the Iraqi people. Take a peek at the article titled: “THE IRANIAN FRAMEWORK: OUR ORDERS COME EXCLUSIVELY FROM IRAN, AND WE DO NOT RESPECT AMERICAN DIRECTIVES.”
Note how they now call it the ‘Iranian Framework’ and not the Coordination Framework. They are now blatant about it even. They words like this in front of the face of President Trump and dare him to take action. How dare the Coordination Framework claim the US is interfering with Iraqi internal affairs in the election when they themselves just announced they are loyal to Iran. Folks, this hypocrisy is almost unbelievable. But in the US the democrats do exactly the same as they claim they are the protectors of democracy yet rig the elections and they try to prosecute anyone who challenges the results as fraudulent. Instead, wouldn’t you want to investigate the alleged fraud, if truly you were the protector of democracy? They also let millions of unvetted immigrants to flood the nation yet now call ICE these people victims. Do they even realize they created the crisis in the first place? Are these sick people or what? So they flood the nation will illegals, yes, non-citizens voting in our elections. Oh… but I guess the manipulated electronic voting machines are going to do the job any long since we are now on to this trick and so they resort to illegal immigration to change the demographics, then redistrict. They will do anything to get in power and stay in power. They are anything but democratic. They know they can’t win an election on their woke ideology. Americans simply don’t want it.
Now we see the same happening in Iraq too as many countries have been hit with schemes to rig their elections.
So, what will be the final result of this election crisis in Iraq? The election cycle will not move ahead until they have political pressure to meet the constitutional deadlines (which they already bypassed) or this Iranian crisis is solved. Nori al-Maliki must withdrawal as the candidate. If he doesn’t it will take much more time to ensure there is enough parliament members that will vote against him in the ratification process. Then another candidate must be rendered by the Coordination Framework. Will the next candidate be any better? These are all issues that must be resolved prior to moving ahead. So does everyone now see who is controlling the election cycle at this point? It is the Kurds. They absolutely do not want Nori al-Maliki on the position of prime minister.
COORDINATION FRAMEWORK DELEGATION HEADS TO ERBIL TO FINALIZE DEAL ON IRAQ’S TOP POSTS
Talks aim to settle the presidency and premiership as the Iraqi parliament convenes to complete Iraq’s constitutional entitlements.
A senior-level delegation from Iraq’s Shiite-led Coordination Framework is scheduled to visit Erbil on Sunday as part of accelerated political efforts to complete Iraq’s constitutional entitlements, particularly the unresolved posts of president and prime minister. An official from the State of Law Coalition revealed that the visit aims to establish a “final roadmap” for resolving both positions.
The delegation is expected to include Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, Deputy Speaker of Parliament Mohsen al-Mandalawi, and Badr Organization leader Hadi al-Ameri, who will meet with senior leaders of the Kurdistan Region.
Abdulrahman al-Jazairi, a member of the State of Law Coalition, told Kurdistan24 that the Erbil visit represents a decisive step intended to address two sensitive files: agreeing on the future Iraqi president and finalizing arrangements for the next prime minister.
According to Jazairi, the talks will focus on reaching political understandings that can unblock the current impasse.
Sources indicated that the Coordination Framework delegation plans to hold discussions with both major Kurdish parties—the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK)—specifically regarding the presidency, which under Iraq’s post-2003 political convention is allocated to the Kurds.
According to Kurdistan24 correspondent in Baghdad, the Coordination Framework is seeking firm assurances from Kurdish forces to support its preferred candidate for prime minister, in exchange for facilitating consensus on a Kurdish nominee for the presidency. Such a trade-off, he argues, could prove decisive in breaking the deadlock that has delayed the completion of Iraq’s governing institutions.
The visit coincides with a crucial session of the Iraqi parliament scheduled for 11:00 a.m. on Sunday to elect a new president. According to the parliamentary media office, the session is considered a key milestone toward fulfilling constitutional deadlines and paving the way for the formation of a new government cabinet.
The parliamentary vote had originally been set for last Tuesday but was postponed at the request of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan. The delay underscored ongoing Kurdish divisions over the presidency, despite the position traditionally being reserved for a Kurdish nominee.
Initially, 81 candidates submitted applications for the presidency. However, the Iraqi parliament announced a final shortlist of 19 candidates on Jan. 23. One candidate, Nawzad Hadi—one of the two nominees put forward by the KDP—later withdrew, leaving 18 contenders in the race.
The remaining candidates include Latif Mohammed Jamal Rashid, Fuad Mohammed Hussein Baki, Abdullah Mohammed Ali Alawi, and several others representing a broad spectrum of political and independent figures.
Sunday’s developments in Erbil and Baghdad are widely seen as pivotal, with political forces racing against constitutional timelines to resolve the presidency and unlock the final steps toward forming Iraq’s next government.
