$100 BILLION IN IRAQI SAVINGS REVEALED AT THE US FEDERAL RESERVE
Economic expert Duraid Al-Anzi said on Friday that Iraq should not have been exposed to any financial crisis or any form of financial distress, stressing that the concerned authorities did not adopt the proposed oil prices in the budgets, which led to the current financial situation.
Al-Anzi explained in a statement to Al-Furat News Agency that “Iraq has been objected to several times regarding not relying on high prices in budgets, and the necessity of not exceeding $65 per barrel in order to be able to save,” noting that “oil prices have changed a lot, but the competent authorities did not think about the future and did not adopt the proposed prices.”
He added that “Iraq is able to demand additional amounts from its savings held by the US Federal Reserve, as Iraq has savings in the US Federal Reserve exceeding $100 billion, which were transferred to JPMorgan,” explaining that “these funds belong to Iraq after 2003 and have accumulated, and the only beneficiary of them is JPMorgan, which gives simple interest rates, and it is not known whether they reach Iraq or not, and they have not been addressed, despite the amounts being doubled.”
Introduction: The Stakes Are High for Iraq and the Dinar
As Iraq navigates political instability and foreign influence, Frank26 recently shared key insights:
“We’re keeping a very close eye on Iraq… Maliki and his clowns are trying to destroy it and tear it apart… That’s why we just showed up.”
The message is clear: the United States, under President Donald Trump, is closely monitoring Iraq’s monetary, political, and economic developments—especially with regards to the Iraqi Dinar.
Trump’s Firm Stance on Maliki and Financial Sanctions
According to Frank26:
“President Trump says America threatens to impose new financial sanctions on Iraq… You think we’re going to give it up? You think we’re just going to walk away?”
The warning is not just political rhetoric. It highlights several key points:
The U.S. will not allow Iraq to fall under destabilizing influence.
Any Iranian-aligned leadership, such as Maliki, will face scrutiny.
“Trump has made it very clear: ‘I am in control of the monetary reform.’”
For holders, this is crucial. The timing and structure of the Dinar revaluation is directly influenced by U.S. oversight, ensuring stability and protection of investments.
Mineral Contracts and U.S. Reconstruction Efforts
Walkingstick shared important context:
“The contractors went into agreements with the United States on minerals… They are waiting for Trump to finish the negotiations. That’s what you’re seeing with Savaya. They are waiting for the rate to go into effect.”
These long-term contracts with the U.S. have major implications:
The United States is first in benefiting from Iraq’s reconstruction and resource development.
Contracts are long-term, ensuring decades of oversight and economic stability.
Dinar revaluation is linked to these agreements, signaling structural readiness.
“Due to these contracts, the United States of America will be heavily involved in the reconstruction of Iraq.”
For Dinar holders, this is an encouraging sign: monetary reform is supported by tangible contracts and infrastructure, not just political promises.
Why This Matters for Dinar Holders
Several key insights for investors:
Political chaos does not equal failure: Trump’s oversight ensures that destabilizing leadership cannot derail reforms.
Dinar holdings are protected: Funds held in the U.S. Federal Reserve are strategically safeguarded.
Revaluation timing is linked to contracts and reconstruction: Structural readiness is the real driver, not election outcomes.
In short, holders should focus on the system, contracts, and infrastructure rather than short-term political headlines.
Featured Snippet / Google Discover Highlight
“Trump asserts control over Iraq’s monetary reform. With U.S.-backed mineral contracts and reconstruction plans, Dinar holders are protected, and the timing of revaluation is structurally secured.”
Q&A: Common Questions from Dinar Holders
Q: Does Maliki returning as PM stop the Dinar revaluation?
A: No. While politically sensitive, monetary reform is overseen by the U.S. and linked to contracts, not political leaders.
Q: Are U.S. sanctions a threat to Dinar holders?
A: No. Sanctions, if imposed, are strategic tools to maintain stability, not to block legitimate investor holdings.
Q: How do mineral contracts impact Dinar revaluation?
A: Contracts provide long-term U.S. involvement in Iraq’s reconstruction, signaling structural readiness for revaluation.
Q: Should investors react to daily headlines?
A: No. Patience, discipline, and focus on infrastructure and contracts are the keys to long-term success.
Final Thoughts: Focus on Structure, Not Political Noise
Frank26 and Walkingstick’s insights confirm a key lesson for holders:
“Do not let politics dictate your investment strategy. Focus on contracts, U.S. oversight, and structural readiness for Dinar revaluation.”
The system is in place. The U.S. is actively managing monetary reform. And Dinar holders should remain calm, patient, and informed.
Frank26 We're keeping a very close eye on Iraq. We know Iraq...still have a lot of Iranian influence...Maliki and his clowns are trying to destroy it and tear it apart...That's why we just showed up.
You think we're going to allow them to do any of this?
Of course not. Don't worry. But you do have to deal with this so President Trump says America threatens to impose new financial sanctions of Iraq...
You think we're going to give it up? You think we're just going to walk away? You think all these 20 years is going to go down the toilet? You think all your dinars that we have in our Federal Reserves are for not?
...Trump has made it very clear...'I am in control of the monetary reform.'
Walkingstick
The contractors went into agreements with the Untied States on minerals...They are waiting for Trump to finish the negotiations. That's what you're seeing with Savaya. They are waiting for the rate to go into effect.
BTW they told me when they get the rate these contracts are long-term contracts with the Untied States for decades. The United States is first...The Untied States of America, due to these contracts will be heavily involved in the reconstruction of Iraq...
FOLLOWING UN CONDEMNATION, THE US TREASURY TARGETS AN OIL FLEET PARALLEL TO THE IRANIAN REGIME.
The US Treasury Department announced on Friday (January 23, 2026) a new package of sanctions targeting what it described as the “parallel fleet” used by the Iranian regime to smuggle oil and finance its security apparatus and regional proxies, in response to what Washington considered a “brutal crackdown” against peaceful protesters and a complete internet blackout inside Iran.
A statement from the ministry, translated by Baghdad Today, said that the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) imposed sanctions on nine ships and a number of companies that own or operate them, after they were involved in transporting hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of Iranian oil and petroleum products to foreign markets, indicating that these revenues are “the right of the Iranian people” but are used, according to the statement, to finance armed groups, weapons programs and security agencies instead of being directed to basic services.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that “the Iranian regime is engaging in economic self-destruction, accelerated by President Trump’s maximum pressure campaign,” noting that Tehran’s decision to “support terrorists at the expense of its own people” has led to currency collapse and deteriorating living conditions. He emphasized that today’s sanctions target a “critical element” in financing repression inside Iran, and that the Treasury will continue to pursue the tens of millions of dollars that the regime “is stealing and attempting to smuggle through foreign banks.”
The statement noted that the new measure was issued pursuant to Executive Order 13902 concerning the oil and petrochemical sectors in Iran, and as a continuation of the sanctions campaign targeting Iranian oil exports in support of the second National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM-2) aimed at imposing “maximum economic pressure” on Tehran.
According to the Treasury Department, the sanctions targeted ships flying the flags of various countries, including the Seabird, AVON, AL DIAB II, CESARIA, LONGEVITY 7, EASTERN HERO, AQUA SPIRIT, CHIRON 5 and KEEL, as well as companies in the UAE, India, Oman, Seychelles, Marshall Islands, Panama and Liberia, as part of the network transporting Iranian oil to East Asia, Pakistan, Somalia and other countries since 2025.
The US Treasury confirmed that all assets and interests of the individuals, companies, and vessels subject to the sanctions are frozen within the United States or within US jurisdiction, and that dealing with them or providing services to them by Americans or through the US financial system is prohibited, while warning that individuals and financial institutions around the world may be subject to potential sanctions if they deal with the listed entities.
The statement noted that the goal of the sanctions “is not punishment in itself, but rather changing the behavior of the regime,” while pointing out that there are mechanisms to remove individuals and entities from the sanctions lists if legal criteria are met, and calling on those wishing to request removal to review the Office of Foreign Assets Control’s guidelines on removal procedures from the lists.
This escalation in sanctions comes after the adoption of a resolution at the UN Human Rights Council, which, by a majority of 22 votes, condemned the Iranian regime’s crackdown on peaceful protesters and called on Tehran to stop the excessive use of force, respect human rights and ensure accountability for violations.
President Donald Trump recently posted on X (formerly Twitter) a strong warning regarding Iraq’s political future:
“I’m hearing that the Great Country of Iraq might make a very bad choice by reinstalling Nouri al-Maliki as Prime Minister. Last time Maliki was in power, the Country descended into poverty and total chaos. That should not be allowed to happen again… if elected, the United States of America will no longer help Iraq and, if we are not there to help, Iraq has ZERO chance of Success, Prosperity, or Freedom. MAKE IRAQ GREAT AGAIN!”
This statement quickly made headlines, with Sandy Ingram reporting:
“Maliki, who has links to Iran, was selected at the weekend by an alliance of Shia-led parties as its nominee for prime minister.”
While this may seem alarming for Iraqi Dinar holders, the real implications are more nuanced—and largely financial, structural, and geopolitical rather than purely political.
Understanding ‘Shadow Sanctions’
Many investors argue Iraq is not under sanctions. But consider this:
“Anytime the US holds your [$112 billion oil] profits in their banks, in the Federal Reserves in New York, you are under what we call 'shadow sanctions'. You are not free to go. Iraq is not free to go out and do whatever the hell it wants to do…Let's call it 'shadow sanctions’.”
Shadow sanctions are unofficial restrictions that prevent Iraq from fully accessing and utilizing its own funds. While not publicly announced, they limit Iraq’s financial freedom, affecting currency movements, banking access, and economic independence.
For Dinar holders, understanding shadow sanctions is critical. These measures can delay or complicate currency revaluation, despite political headlines.
Why Maliki as Prime Minister Is a Concern
Nouri al-Maliki’s previous tenure in Iraq was marked by:
Political instability
Economic decline
Alleged corruption and chaos
Trump’s warning reflects the risk perception: if Maliki returns, the U.S. might withdraw support, leaving Iraq vulnerable.
However, experienced investors know:
political headlines are not always indicators of monetary timing. Structural banking reforms, international oversight, and compliance measures often move independently of leadership changes.
What This Means for Dinar Holders
Key takeaways for investors:
Ignore the noise – Emotional reactions to political headlines often lead to mistakes.
Focus on financial infrastructure – Currency revaluation depends on banking systems, not election outcomes.
Understand “shadow sanctions” – Limited access to funds impacts liquidity and timing of investments.
Stay patient – The process is long-term and controlled, not headline-driven.
Featured Snippet
“Trump warns that Iraq could fail if Maliki returns as Prime Minister, citing US withdrawal of support. Dinar holders should focus on banking systems and shadow sanctions rather than reacting emotionally to headlines.”
Q&A: Common Questions from Dinar Holders
Q: Does Maliki returning as PM stop a Dinar revaluation?
A: No. While politically sensitive, currency reforms are usually implemented independently from individual leaders.
Q: What are “shadow sanctions”?
A: Unofficial restrictions preventing Iraq from accessing or freely using its own funds, affecting liquidity and financial operations.
Q: Should I panic as a Dinar holder?
A: No. Emotional reactions can lead to mistakes. Focus on structural readiness and banking accessibility.
Q: How can investors track Iraq’s financial progress?
A: Monitor official banking announcements, international audits, and legitimate Dinar updates from credible channels.
Final Thoughts: Focus on Structure, Not Politics
Political headlines are designed to provoke emotion and debate—but the real factors for Dinar investors are structural and financial.
“Do not let headlines dictate your investment strategy. Focus on banking systems, shadow sanctions, and timing.”
Patience, discipline, and understanding of the underlying financial infrastructure are the keys to long-term success.
Clare President Trump X post: "I’m hearing that the Great Country of Iraq might make a very bad choice by reinstalling Nouri al-Maliki as Prime Minister. Last time Maliki was in power, the Country descended into poverty and total chaos. That should not be allowed to happen again.
Because of his insane policies and ideologies, if elected, the United States of America will no longer help Iraq and, if we are not there to help, Iraq has ZERO chance of Success, Prosperity, or Freedom. MAKE IRAQ GREAT AGAIN!"
Sandy Ingram Article: "Trump says US will no 'no longer help Iraq' if it picks Maliki as PM" Quote: "Maliki who has links to Iran was selected at the weekend by an alliance of Shia-led parties as its nominee for prime minister."
I know we've had arguments... before. People have said to me, 'Iraq is not under sanctions. You don't know what you're talking about. It's BS.' No, no, no, no, no. Anytime the US holds your [$112 billion oil] profits in their banks, in the Federal Reserves in New York, you are under what we call 'shadow sanctions'. You are not free to go. Iraq is not free to go out and do whatever the hell it wants to do...I don't care what you say or how you say it, to me that's sanctions. Okay, let's get soft with it. Let's call it 'shadow sanctions'.
WASHINGTON THREATENS BAGHDAD WITH THE “NUCLEAR OPTION” (in a matter of speaking): REPLACE FAYHAN AND DISARM THE FACTIONS IMMEDIATELY
The British newspaper “Financial Times” revealed that the United States has been pressuring senior Iraqi politicians in recent weeks to form a government that does not include representatives of armed groups supported by Iran, through threats that include economic measures, such as reducing the supply of dollars sent in cash in exchange for Iraq’s oil sales.
The newspaper quoted informed sources in a report translated by Shafaq News Agency, stating that American officials, during their meeting with prominent Iraqi political leaders tasked with forming the next government in recent weeks, pushed for the presentation of a credible plan to disarm Iranian-backed armed groups quickly.
The report quoted five sources familiar with the talks as saying that US officials threatened punitive measures if this did not happen. According to three sources, the threats included imposing economic measures, such as reducing the supply of dollars sent in cash in exchange for Iraqi oil sales.
According to the report, tensions with Washington escalated after the election last month of Adnan Faihan, a former member of Asaib Ahl al-Haq, who now leads its political wing, as first deputy speaker of parliament, in a country the report described as being seen as the last stronghold of Iranian influence in the Middle East.
The report quoted one of the sources as saying, “The American embassy completely lost its temper, told us that this was hostile and defiant behavior, and demanded that we replace him.”
The report noted that the coordinating framework that received the largest share of votes is leading the government formation process, and it includes members of several “militias” that the United States classifies as “terrorist” groups. It pointed out that although the fighters of these groups have become less visible now, they enjoy a strong presence in Iraq, while these groups have become part of the state’s security apparatus .
The report also considered Asaib Ahl al-Haq to be among the most influential of these groups, noting that Asaib is trying to reintroduce itself politically, and had a minister in the previous government. The report indicates that after Asaib Ahl al-Haq came in third in the election results, its political wing, like the wings of other factions, is trying to expand its presence within the government and state institutions, and to deepen the dialogue with Western capitals that are wary of dealing with a group classified by the United States as a terrorist organization.
The report noted that the administration of US President Donald Trump has not yet appointed an ambassador to Baghdad, as is the case in many world capitals that were considered pivotal to US foreign policy. Also, Mark Savaya, Trump’s nominee to serve as special envoy to Iraq, has not yet received congressional approval, while analysts say his influence is limited.
The report also stated that US forces withdrew completely from Iraqi territory under the control of the federal government a few days ago, but will remain in the Kurdistan region. The report quoted Renad Mansour, a researcher at the British think tank Chatham House, as saying that “Iraq has fallen off the radar of the United States more than at any time in recent decades, yet the Trump administration remains very influential, directly and indirectly, in how the government is formed.”
The report also quoted former US State Department official Victoria Taylor as saying that “the Trump administration’s policy toward Iraq is driven more by Iran than by the relationship with Iraq.”
The report also revealed that since Fayhan’s election to his new position, US officials have frozen all meetings with their allies who voted for him, and have issued a list of names of MPs they do not want to have in the government. In addition to demanding that Faihan be replaced from his position as First Deputy Speaker of Parliament, US officials are also calling for plans to be accelerated to disarm Shiite armed groups.
The report noted that Savaya had said in recent social media posts that the US Treasury Department would be reviewing transactions of Iraqi entities suspected of having financial links to “terrorist activities “.
According to three informed sources, Washington threatened to cut off dollar supplies to Iraq if Baghdad rejected American demands, a move one of these sources described as the “nuclear option “. The report explained that Iraq’s economy has long relied on a special arrangement reached after the US invasion of Iraq, whereby since 2003, Washington has been sending billions of dollars in cash shipments annually to Baghdad via monthly flights, funds originating from Iraqi oil sales, the proceeds of which are deposited into Iraq’s account at the US Federal Reserve.
The report stated that if Washington were to cut off these dollar supplies again, Iraqis fear instability and an economic crisis. The report quoted one of these sources as saying, “They told us that if we do not meet their demands, America will not be willing to help Iraq .”
According to the report, these threats, in addition to fears of possible military action by the United States and Israel, contributed to pushing Iraqi politicians to comply with some American demands.
The report also quoted five people familiar with the talks as saying that the Coordination Framework and Asaib Ahl al-Haq had expressed their willingness to replace Fayhan, with one of these sources saying that “it is better to compromise on this point than to compromise on another.”
According to the British report, the issue of disarmament remains the most sensitive issue, as the “militias” have long resisted pressure to disarm, considering that their weapons are still necessary to defend Iraq.
The report quoted a source as saying that the coordinating framework, including the main militias backed by Tehran, offered to announce a phased disarmament plan over two years after the formation of the government, hoping that the issue would “lose momentum” before its implementation. However, the report said that Washington demanded immediate action.
The report quoted Taylor as saying, “These demands are all in line with this administration’s goals,” adding, “Given Iran’s weakness and the militias’ fear of Trump and what he might do, why shouldn’t the United States try to exert maximum pressure?