Wednesday, January 28, 2026

FOLLOWING UN CONDEMNATION, THE US TREASURY TARGETS AN OIL FLEET PARALLEL TO THE IRANIAN REGIME

To suppress the protests

FOLLOWING UN CONDEMNATION, THE US TREASURY TARGETS AN OIL FLEET PARALLEL TO THE IRANIAN REGIME.

The US Treasury Department announced on Friday (January 23, 2026) a new package of sanctions targeting what it described as the “parallel fleet” used by the Iranian regime to smuggle oil and finance its security apparatus and regional proxies, in response to what Washington considered a “brutal crackdown” against peaceful protesters and a complete internet blackout inside Iran.

A statement from the ministry, translated by Baghdad Today, said that the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) imposed sanctions on nine ships and a number of companies that own or operate them, after they were involved in transporting hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of Iranian oil and petroleum products to foreign markets, indicating that these revenues are “the right of the Iranian people” but are used, according to the statement, to finance armed groups, weapons programs and security agencies instead of being directed to basic services.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that “the Iranian regime is engaging in economic self-destruction, accelerated by President Trump’s maximum pressure campaign,” noting that Tehran’s decision to “support terrorists at the expense of its own people” has led to currency collapse and deteriorating living conditions. He emphasized that today’s sanctions target a “critical element” in financing repression inside Iran, and that the Treasury will continue to pursue the tens of millions of dollars that the regime “is stealing and attempting to smuggle through foreign banks.”

The statement noted that the new measure was issued pursuant to Executive Order 13902 concerning the oil and petrochemical sectors in Iran, and as a continuation of the sanctions campaign targeting Iranian oil exports in support of the second National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM-2) aimed at imposing “maximum economic pressure” on Tehran.

According to the Treasury Department, the sanctions targeted ships flying the flags of various countries, including the Seabird, AVON, AL DIAB II, CESARIA, LONGEVITY 7, EASTERN HERO, AQUA SPIRIT, CHIRON 5 and KEEL, as well as companies in the UAE, India, Oman, Seychelles, Marshall Islands, Panama and Liberia, as part of the network transporting Iranian oil to East Asia, Pakistan, Somalia and other countries since 2025.

The US Treasury confirmed that all assets and interests of the individuals, companies, and vessels subject to the sanctions are frozen within the United States or within US jurisdiction, and that dealing with them or providing services to them by Americans or through the US financial system is prohibited, while warning that individuals and financial institutions around the world may be subject to potential sanctions if they deal with the listed entities.

The statement noted that the goal of the sanctions “is not punishment in itself, but rather changing the behavior of the regime,” while pointing out that there are mechanisms to remove individuals and entities from the sanctions lists if legal criteria are met, and calling on those wishing to request removal to review the Office of Foreign Assets Control’s guidelines on removal procedures from the lists.

This escalation in sanctions comes after the adoption of a resolution at the UN Human Rights Council, which, by a majority of 22 votes, condemned the Iranian regime’s crackdown on peaceful protesters and called on Tehran to stop the excessive use of force, respect human rights and ensure accountability for violations.


CLARE & SANDY INGRAM: Trump Warns on Maliki: What Iraqi Dinar Investors Need to Know

 Introduction: Trump’s Warning Shakes Dinar Holders

President Donald Trump recently posted on X (formerly Twitter) a strong warning regarding Iraq’s political future:

“I’m hearing that the Great Country of Iraq might make a very bad choice by reinstalling Nouri al-Maliki as Prime Minister. Last time Maliki was in power, the Country descended into poverty and total chaos. That should not be allowed to happen again… if elected, the United States of America will no longer help Iraq and, if we are not there to help, Iraq has ZERO chance of Success, Prosperity, or Freedom. MAKE IRAQ GREAT AGAIN!”

This statement quickly made headlines, with Sandy Ingram reporting:

“Maliki, who has links to Iran, was selected at the weekend by an alliance of Shia-led parties as its nominee for prime minister.”

While this may seem alarming for Iraqi Dinar holders, the real implications are more nuanced—and largely financial, structural, and geopolitical rather than purely political.


Understanding ‘Shadow Sanctions’

Many investors argue Iraq is not under sanctions. But consider this:

“Anytime the US holds your [$112 billion oil] profits in their banks, in the Federal Reserves in New York, you are under what we call 'shadow sanctions'. You are not free to go. Iraq is not free to go out and do whatever the hell it wants to do…Let's call it 'shadow sanctions’.”

Shadow sanctions are unofficial restrictions that prevent Iraq from fully accessing and utilizing its own funds. While not publicly announced, they limit Iraq’s financial freedom, affecting currency movements, banking access, and economic independence.

For Dinar holders, understanding shadow sanctions is critical. These measures can delay or complicate currency revaluation, despite political headlines.


Why Maliki as Prime Minister Is a Concern

Nouri al-Maliki’s previous tenure in Iraq was marked by:

  • Political instability

  • Economic decline

  • Alleged corruption and chaos

Trump’s warning reflects the risk perception: if Maliki returns, the U.S. might withdraw support, leaving Iraq vulnerable.

However, experienced investors know:  political headlines are not always indicators of monetary timing. Structural banking reforms, international oversight, and compliance measures often move independently of leadership changes.


What This Means for Dinar Holders

Key takeaways for investors:

  1. Ignore the noise – Emotional reactions to political headlines often lead to mistakes.

  2. Focus on financial infrastructure – Currency revaluation depends on banking systems, not election outcomes.

  3. Understand “shadow sanctions” – Limited access to funds impacts liquidity and timing of investments.

  4. Stay patient – The process is long-term and controlled, not headline-driven.


Featured Snippet 

“Trump warns that Iraq could fail if Maliki returns as Prime Minister, citing US withdrawal of support. Dinar holders should focus on banking systems and shadow sanctions rather than reacting emotionally to headlines.”


Q&A: Common Questions from Dinar Holders

Q: Does Maliki returning as PM stop a Dinar revaluation?

A: No. While politically sensitive, currency reforms are usually implemented independently from individual leaders.

Q: What are “shadow sanctions”?

A: Unofficial restrictions preventing Iraq from accessing or freely using its own funds, affecting liquidity and financial operations.

Q: Should I panic as a Dinar holder?

A: No. Emotional reactions can lead to mistakes. Focus on structural readiness and banking accessibility.

Q: How can investors track Iraq’s financial progress?

A: Monitor official banking announcements, international audits, and legitimate Dinar updates from credible channels.


Final Thoughts: Focus on Structure, Not Politics

Political headlines are designed to provoke emotion and debate—but the real factors for Dinar investors are structural and financial.

“Do not let headlines dictate your investment strategy. Focus on banking systems, shadow sanctions, and timing.”

Patience, discipline, and understanding of the underlying financial infrastructure are the keys to long-term success.


Follow, Join, and Stay Informed

📘 Official Blog:
👉 https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/

📢 Telegram Channel:
👉 https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION

📘 Facebook Page:
👉 https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064023274131

🐦 Twitter/X:
👉 https://x.com/DinaresGurus

📺 YouTube Channel:
👉 
https://www.youtube.com/@DINARREVALUATION


 Hashtags

#IraqiDinar #Maliki #TrumpNews #ShadowSanctions
#CurrencyRevaluation #DinarUpdate #SmartInvesting
#IraqInvestment #FinancialFreedom #DinarWatch

Clare  President Trump X post:  "I’m hearing that the Great Country of Iraq might make a very bad choice by reinstalling Nouri al-Maliki as Prime Minister.  Last time Maliki was in power, the Country descended into poverty and total chaos. That should not be allowed to happen again.

 Because of his insane policies and ideologies, if elected, the United States of  America will no longer help Iraq and, if we are not there to help, Iraq has ZERO chance of Success, Prosperity, or Freedom.   MAKE IRAQ GREAT AGAIN!"

 Sandy Ingram  Article:  "Trump says US will no 'no longer help Iraq' if it picks Maliki as PM"  Quote: "Maliki who has links to Iran was selected at the weekend by an alliance of Shia-led parties as its nominee for prime minister."

I know we've had arguments... before.  People have said to me, 'Iraq is not under sanctions.   You don't know what you're talking about.  It's BS.'  No, no, no, no, no.  Anytime the US holds your [$112 billion oil] profits in their banks, in the Federal Reserves in New York, you are under what we call 'shadow sanctions'.  You are not free to go.  Iraq is not free to go out and do whatever the hell it wants to do...I don't care what you say or how you say it, to me that's sanctions.  Okay, let's get soft with it.  Let's call it 'shadow sanctions'.

FRANK26 BANK STORY!! : "Dinar Holder’s Experience: Bank First Accepts Iraqi Currency" #iqd


 

WASHINGTON THREATENS BAGHDAD WITH THE “NUCLEAR OPTION” (in a matter of speaking): REPLACE FAYHAN AND DISARM THE FACTIONS IMMEDIATELY

 WASHINGTON THREATENS BAGHDAD WITH THE “NUCLEAR OPTION” (in a matter of speaking): REPLACE FAYHAN AND DISARM THE FACTIONS IMMEDIATELY

The British newspaper “Financial Times” revealed that the United States has been pressuring senior Iraqi politicians in recent weeks to form a government that does not include representatives of armed groups supported by Iran, through threats that include economic measures, such as reducing the supply of dollars sent in cash in exchange for Iraq’s oil sales.

The newspaper quoted informed sources in a report translated by Shafaq News Agency, stating that American officials, during their meeting with prominent Iraqi political leaders tasked with forming the next government in recent weeks, pushed for the presentation of a credible plan to disarm Iranian-backed armed groups quickly.

The report quoted five sources familiar with the talks as saying that US officials threatened punitive measures if this did not happen. According to three sources, the threats included imposing economic measures, such as reducing the supply of dollars sent in cash in exchange for Iraqi oil sales.

According to the report, tensions with Washington escalated after the election last month of Adnan Faihan, a former member of Asaib Ahl al-Haq, who now leads its political wing, as first deputy speaker of parliament, in a country the report described as being seen as the last stronghold of Iranian influence in the Middle East.

The report quoted one of the sources as saying, “The American embassy completely lost its temper, told us that this was hostile and defiant behavior, and demanded that we replace him.”

The report noted that the coordinating framework that received the largest share of votes is leading the government formation process, and it includes members of several “militias” that the United States classifies as “terrorist” groups. It pointed out that although the fighters of these groups have become less visible now, they enjoy a strong presence in Iraq, while these groups have become part of the state’s security apparatus .

The report also considered Asaib Ahl al-Haq to be among the most influential of these groups, noting that Asaib is trying to reintroduce itself politically, and had a minister in the previous government. The report indicates that after Asaib Ahl al-Haq came in third in the election results, its political wing, like the wings of other factions, is trying to expand its presence within the government and state institutions, and to deepen the dialogue with Western capitals that are wary of dealing with a group classified by the United States as a terrorist organization.

The report noted that the administration of US President Donald Trump has not yet appointed an ambassador to Baghdad, as is the case in many world capitals that were considered pivotal to US foreign policy. Also, Mark Savaya, Trump’s nominee to serve as special envoy to Iraq, has not yet received congressional approval, while analysts say his influence is limited.

The report also stated that US forces withdrew completely from Iraqi territory under the control of the federal government a few days ago, but will remain in the Kurdistan region. The report quoted Renad Mansour, a researcher at the British think tank Chatham House, as saying that “Iraq has fallen off the radar of the United States more than at any time in recent decades, yet the Trump administration remains very influential, directly and indirectly, in how the government is formed.”

The report also quoted former US State Department official Victoria Taylor as saying that “the Trump administration’s policy toward Iraq is driven more by Iran than by the relationship with Iraq.”

The report also revealed that since Fayhan’s election to his new position, US officials have frozen all meetings with their allies who voted for him, and have issued a list of names of MPs they do not want to have in the government. In addition to demanding that Faihan be replaced from his position as First Deputy Speaker of Parliament, US officials are also calling for plans to be accelerated to disarm Shiite armed groups.

The report noted that Savaya had said in recent social media posts that the US Treasury Department would be reviewing transactions of Iraqi entities suspected of having financial links to “terrorist activities “.

According to three informed sources, Washington threatened to cut off dollar supplies to Iraq if Baghdad rejected American demands, a move one of these sources described as the “nuclear option “. The report explained that Iraq’s economy has long relied on a special arrangement reached after the US invasion of Iraq, whereby since 2003, Washington has been sending billions of dollars in cash shipments annually to Baghdad via monthly flights, funds originating from Iraqi oil sales, the proceeds of which are deposited into Iraq’s account at the US Federal Reserve.

The report stated that if Washington were to cut off these dollar supplies again, Iraqis fear instability and an economic crisis. The report quoted one of these sources as saying, “They told us that if we do not meet their demands, America will not be willing to help Iraq .”

According to the report, these threats, in addition to fears of possible military action by the United States and Israel, contributed to pushing Iraqi politicians to comply with some American demands.

The report also quoted five people familiar with the talks as saying that the Coordination Framework and Asaib Ahl al-Haq had expressed their willingness to replace Fayhan, with one of these sources saying that “it is better to compromise on this point than to compromise on another.”

According to the British report, the issue of disarmament remains the most sensitive issue, as the “militias” have long resisted pressure to disarm, considering that their weapons are still necessary to defend Iraq.

The report quoted a source as saying that the coordinating framework, including the main militias backed by Tehran, offered to announce a phased disarmament plan over two years after the formation of the government, hoping that the issue would “lose momentum” before its implementation. However, the report said that Washington demanded immediate action.

The report quoted Taylor as saying, “These demands are all in line with this administration’s goals,” adding, “Given Iran’s weakness and the militias’ fear of Trump and what he might do, why shouldn’t the United States try to exert maximum pressure?

FRANK26: Wisconsin Bank First Makes Dinar Exchange Easy: Real Holder Testimony

 Introduction: Finally, a Bank That Understands Dinar Holders

For years, Iraqi Dinar holders have faced frustration with major banks refusing to handle foreign currency.
Mrs. B, a holder in Wisconsin, shared a surprising experience with Bank First: a bank that not only accepts Iraqi Dinar but makes the process easy, fast, and friendly.

Her story highlights a crucial point for holders: not all banks are created equal when it comes to currency exchange.


Mrs. B’s Experience with Bank First

Mrs. B recalls:

“I asked if they take the currency, Iraqi Dinar. He said yes, we do. Then he asked if I had an account—I said no, and I’d like to open one. He asked how much currency I had. I told him, and he said, ‘Oh, wow. Can I put you on hold real quick?’”

Within 30 seconds of hanging up, Mrs. B received a call inviting her to open an account the next day.

“I went in, opened my account, and talked with a loan officer. She said, ‘When the time is here, go to a teller and they’ll take care of you.’ It was as easy as that. We were shocked and happy, now we’re waiting for the go.”


Bank First vs. Major Banks: Chase Denies, Bank First Says Yes

Many holders have faced denials from major banks. Mrs. B explained:

“Chase has told me many times they won’t cash it. Done with Chase. Bank First? Here I am.”

The bank clearly knew it was Iraqi Dinar and even confirmed they handle other foreign currencies like the Vietnamese Dong

.

“They didn’t deny it one single bit. Every time I called Chase, I got denied. Denied. Denied. This was the first time someone said yes, were friendly, and told me, ‘Come in… go to the nearest teller and we’ll cash it and put it in your account. Bing, bam, boom.’”


Why This Story Matters to Dinar Holders

This story is a real-world example of how accessible Dinar exchange can be, if you find the right banking partner.

Key takeaways:

  1. Not all banks refuse foreign currency—local or smaller banks may handle it easily.

  2. Preparation is key—having an account and being transparent about your holdings helps.

  3. Be patient and persistent—the right bank can make the process surprisingly simple.


Featured Snippet 

“Bank First in Wisconsin accepted Iraqi Dinar for deposit and exchange. Mrs. B opened an account, and when the time comes, she can walk into a teller and cash it—without the frustration experienced at larger banks like Chase.”


Q&A: Common Questions from Dinar Holders

Q: Can Bank First really cash Iraqi Dinar?

A: Yes. They confirmed they handle Iraqi Dinar and other foreign currencies like the Dong.

Q: Why do major banks like Chase refuse?

A: Large banks often have strict policies, risk concerns, or lack specialized foreign currency systems.

Q: Is it safe to deal with smaller local banks?

A: Yes, if they are reputable, FDIC-insured, and clear about their foreign currency policies.

Q: How should holders prepare before visiting a bank?

A: Open an account, have your currency organized, and clearly communicate the type and amount of currency you hold.


Final Thoughts: Persistence Pays Off for Dinar Holders

Mrs. B’s story shows that success in exchanging Iraqi Dinar isn’t impossible—it just requires the right bank and the right approach.

“It was as easy as that. Bing, bam, boom. Now we wait for the go.”

Patience, preparation, and persistence are the keys to avoiding frustration and navigating this complex, often misunderstood investment.


Follow Us for More Updates on Dinar & Investments

📘 Official Blog:
👉 https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/

📢 Telegram Channel:
👉 https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION

📘 Facebook Page:
👉 https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064023274131

🐦 Twitter/X:
👉 https://x.com/DinaresGurus

📺 YouTube Channel:
👉 
https://www.youtube.com/@DINARREVALUATION


Hashtags

#IraqiDinar #DinarExchange #BankFirst #DinarHolders
#ForeignCurrency #CurrencyExchange #SmartInvesting
#DinarNews #IraqiDinarUpdate #BingBamBoom

Frank26  

[Wisconsin Bank story]   

 DINAR HOLDER MRS. B:  I asked if they [Bank First] take the currency Iraqi dinar. He said yes we do.  He asked if I had an account and I said no I would like to open one...He said can I ask you how much currency do you have I told him and he's like Oh, wowCan I put you on hold real quick? .

..Came back and said someone's going to call you back today.  Not even 30 seconds after hanging up with him I got a phone call.  They wanted me to come in the next day to open an account.  I went in, I opened my account and talked with a loan officer.  She said when the time is here I go in and bring [my currency] to a teller and they'll take care of me and it was as easy as that.  And they'll put it in my account.  We were like wow it's that easy?  We were shocked and we're happy and now we're waiting for the go. 

FRANK:  Had they ever in the past told you it was a scam?

 DINAR HOLDER MRS B:   Bank First never did but Chase has many time and they still do here - they're not going to cash it, this and that. So I'm like, all right, done with you, insulted.  Done with Chase.  Bank First here I am.

  FRANK:  So Bank First knew it's foreign currency that you want to exchange?  

DINAR HOLDER MRS B:  Yep.  And they said they take that one and they take the dong.  

FRANK:  That one?  You mean to tell me they knew you were talking about the dinar?

 DINAR HOLDER MRS B: Yep. They sure did.  They didn't deny it one single bit.  Every time I would call Chase I got denied. Denied. Denied.  This was the first thing that actually said yes and were really friendly and nice and said when the time's here, come on in and we got you...Come on in...go to the nearest teller and we'll cash it and put it in your account. Bing, bam, boom.


FRANK26…..TRUMP CARD

BREAKING | SOURCES TO IRAQ OBSERVER: TRUMP’S ENVOY TO IRAQ, SAVAYA, HAS ALREADY ARRIVED IN BAGHDAD AND MET WITH AL-SUDANI AT A WORKING DINNER

 BREAKING | SOURCES TO IRAQ OBSERVER: TRUMP’S ENVOY TO IRAQ, SAVAYA, HAS ALREADY ARRIVED IN BAGHDAD AND MET WITH AL-SUDANI AT A WORKING DINNER.

According to multiple sources, US President Donald Trump’s envoy to Iraq, Mark Savaya, has already arrived in Baghdad.

These sources, speaking to Iraq Observer, said Savaya met with Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani for a working dinner on Thursday evening.

The anticipated visit of the US envoy was preceded by a series of statements he made through a number of tweets on his official X account, focusing on combating the rampant corruption in the Iraqi state and drying up its sources.

In the past few days, Savaya has also posted a series of photos of his meetings with US President Trump, the Secretaries of War and the Treasury, and other US officials, along with comments about his intention to address a number of crises facing Iraq.

No official statement has yet been issued by the Iraqi government regarding the start of the visit and its agenda.


Iraq Crisis 2026: U.S. Strategy, Oil Market Impact & Global Investment Risks Explained

🌍  Breaking: New Claims About U.S. Plans in Iraq The latest developments in Iraq are raising serious concerns among global investors, energ...