Sunday, March 16, 2025

FRANK26: "WHAT DID I TELL YOU FAMILY... DO YOU RECALL?", 16 MARCH

 KTFA

FRANK26: "WHAT DID I TELL YOU FAMILY... DO YOU RECALL?".......F26

Iran may lose Iraq." Trump and the possibility of exploiting "fear" in nuclear negotiations.

 

3/12/2025

 

The American magazine "Foreign Affairs" reported that the Trump administration has an opportunity to expel Iran from Iraq, not through military action, but rather through "firm diplomacy, the threat of sanctions, and intelligence operations," giving the Americans greater leverage at the negotiating table with the Iranians .

After the American report, translated by Shafaq News Agency, pointed to the success of Iran's strategy since 1979, establishing a network of "agents and friends" across the Middle East, which has given Tehran influence in Iraq, Lebanon, and Syria, the report said that the events of the past year have upended this regional order, with Israel's destruction of Hezbollah in Lebanon and the control of Sunni forces supported by Türkiye over Syria.

He added that Iran is "terrified of another domino falling," with Iraq considered the most likely place for this to happen, as Tehran's allies in Baghdad are already on edge.

Sudanese concessions

According to the report, Iraqi politicians appear more eager than usual to appease the United States, noting that Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani's team made three concessions to American officials in late January: the cancellation of an arrest warrant for US President Donald Trump for ordering the killing of Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, deputy head of the Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces, and General Qassem Soleimani, commander of Iran's Quds Force, in an airstrike on January 3, 2020, near Baghdad International Airport during his first presidential term.

The second concession, he noted, was agreeing to work toward the release of Israeli researcher Elizabeth Tsurkov, as well as approving a significant budget amendment long sought by the Kurds, whom the report described as "the segment of Iraqi society most closely connected to Trump."

While the report viewed these concessions as an indication that Iran's allies in Iraq feel "weak," it noted that Washington must exploit this moment to permanently limit Iranian influence in Iraq. It added that this should not be achieved through extensive military action, but rather through assertive diplomacy, the threat of sanctions, and intelligence operations.

The report considered that such measures would deprive Iran of a vital source of funding, give the United States leverage in any negotiations with Iranian leaders, and, most importantly, lead to better governance for Iraqis who have suffered under the yoke of Iran.

"The cash cow"

The report spoke of a "cash cow" and how Iran and its proxies feed off the Iraqi economy, which is why Tehran is holding on tightly to Baghdad, just as the East India Company did, plundering India's wealth to finance the British Empire for centuries.

The report addressed some of the actions of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps in this context in Iraq, such as transporting Iranian oil into Iraqi waters to be falsely labeled as Iraqi and exported to global markets. Meanwhile, Iranian-backed militias, such as Asaib Ahl al-Haq and Kata'ib Hezbollah, "steal" Iraqi oil directly from wells or by establishing "front companies" that unfairly receive subsidized fuel from the government.

The report also touched on the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), which are nominally under the control of the Iraqi government and receive approximately $3 billion in government funding. It also touched on the state-owned Al-Muhandis Company, which cooperates with Chinese and Revolutionary Guard-run companies to receive oil and construction contracts from the Iraqi government. The report noted that the Iranian government is under immense financial pressure, with the national currency collapsing, and commodity prices rising daily, with inflation averaging 32%. 

The loss of Lebanon and Syria

The report continued, stating that maintaining control over Iraq is vital for the Iranian regime after losing two Arab states, as this makes it appear vulnerable and boosts the morale of its opponents. It added that losing influence in another Arab state, namely Iraq, which is geographically and socially closer to Iran, would be devastating and could have negative repercussions domestically, as the regime in Tehran fears that if it loses control over its neighbor, it will likely lose control over its own people.

However, the report stated that "expelling Iran from Iraq is not an easy task," given its significant influence within the Iraqi government, far exceeding that of the United States. However, Washington must take steps to ensure that Iraqi leaders do not submit to Iranian demands by setting clear red lines that Iraqi leaders understand.

The report stated that Washington should hold exclusive meetings with Iraqis who serve Iraq's national interests and take a tougher stance against Iraqi elites who harm their country's interests through their alliance with Iran. It should impose sanctions on their assets, marginalize them diplomatically, and threaten the use of force against Iranian-backed "terrorists" and their financiers in Iraq.

In this context, the report noted two "steps in the right direction" taken by the Trump administration: the memorandum calling on the Treasury Department to "impose immediate sanctions or take appropriate enforcement action" against anyone violating sanctions on Iran, and Washington's refusal on March 7 to renew the sanctions waiver allowing Iraq to purchase electricity from Iran.

Although the report acknowledges that such steps may not dissuade all Iraqi leaders from coordinating with Iran, given that there is a small segment of elites who despise the United States, it states that the vast majority of Iraqis are neither loyal to Tehran nor to Washington, but are simply responding to incentives, which Iran has been adept at providing so far.

Strict diplomatic sanctions

Therefore, the report argues that sanctions and tough diplomacy could further help Washington strengthen its position with Iraq and may also help it gain an advantage over Iran during the nuclear talks.

He added that Iran fears losing its influence in Baghdad, and that the Trump administration could use this fear as leverage in negotiations. 

The report continued, saying that Trump may engage with Tehran while tightening the noose on its networks inside Iraq, which would encourage Iran to come to the negotiating table rather than evade or prolong the negotiations.

The report concluded by stating that "by removing Iran from Iraq, Washington will have an opportunity to limit Tehran's global influence and enhance the chances of reaching an agreement that halts its nuclear program at the same time. The Trump administration must seize this opportunity."

 

(AS WE HAVE BEEN TEACHING DR. SHABIBI WANTED SECURITY & STABILITY FOR THE NEW EXCHANGE RATE TO BE RELEASED... AND YOU FAMILY, AND TRUMP KNOW WHO TO REMOVE FOR THIS SECURITY & STABILITY. -F26)

.
LINK

TIDBIT FROM KAPERONI, 16 MARCH

 Kaperoni  

February Article: "Finance Minister at IMF meeting: We expect non-oil revenues to increase". 

  March Article:  "IMF records remarkable growth in Iraq's non-oil GDP by 5% in 2024"

---

Question: "Assuming this [Digital Dinar] happens, will we need to turn in our currency and allow it to be converted to digital? 

 If so, where will it be held?"

  At some point, you may have to get a dinar denominated account through some market maker or ECN.

 Then of course, you could watch the dinar rise or sell it when you want to cash out. But all of that is yet to be determined. No need to get ahead of ourselves.

Frank26 : Don't ever let go of your dinars.!! ‪@DINARREVALUATION‬ #iraqidinarinvestor #iraqidinar

 


Reassuring citizens.. Central Bank of / Nina /: We have a large cash liquidity, 16 MARCH

Reassuring citizens.. Central Bank of / Nina /: We have a large cash liquidity

Baghdad / Nina / The Central Bank of Iraq reassured the banking and community communities to ensure the availability of cash liquidity to cover all local transactions in Iraqi dinars.

The Governor of the Central Bank, Ali Al-Alak, said in a statement to the Iraqi National News Agency / Nina / that “the Central Bank is the last entity that can be without cash liquidity in Iraq.”

He explained that “the central bank has a wide scope in providing the local currency by the extent that this currency covers foreign reserves, which currently exceed the level of local efficiency, and more than we can finance.”

He added, “There is a frequent confusion between the status of the Central Bank, a case completely different from the financial situation related to the financial policy in the country or the Ministry of Finance,” noting that “the revenues of the Ministry of Finance depend in dollars through Iraqi oil sales in the world market.”

Al-Alak stressed that “the Central Bank deals with the Iraqi dinar for all the amounts it receives in dollars, and this is available very much under any circumstances,” calling for distinguishing and separating the financial situation at the level of the government and the Ministry of Finance, and the availability of cash at the Central Bank of Iraq. /Finished5

NADER FROM MID EAST: A Stand for Humanity, 16 MARCH

 NADER FROM MID EAST:  A Stand for Humanity

Introduction

The discussion centers around the significance of standing against violence and injustice, particularly in the context of the ongoing conflicts around the world. 

The speaker, deeply influenced by their personal history rooted in the Middle East, takes a strong position against genocide and encourages unity among diverse communities. Notably, the speaker articulates a sense of pride in the Jewish community of America for their moral stance in the face of adversity, exemplifying the bravery attributed to their ancestry and shared humanity.

 The key concepts emerging from this narrative include common sensehumanity, and the resistance against manipulation that prioritizes division over solidarity. This chapter elucidates these themes while exploring the complexities of identity, historical memory, and the pressing necessity of collective action against oppression.

The Power of Unity Against Injustice

  • The speaker highlights increasing awareness and resistance among Americans, particularly the Jewish community, standing against genocide.
  • A strong emphasis is placed on the phrase “never again,” recalling its historical significance post-Holocaust, and underscoring a commitment to prevent future atrocities.
  • The speaker expresses admiration for those who are courageously voicing dissent against societal wrongs, regardless of religious or cultural backgrounds, framing it as an overarching battle for  humanity.

The Role of Propaganda and Manipulation

  • The speaker addresses how narratives of fear and propaganda—depicting others as threats—perpetuate cycles of violence and hatred.
  • This manipulation transforms communities into commodities, subject to external controls and narratives, resembling “toys” in a larger game.
  • By heralding the idea that groups, regardless of their identities (e.g., Jewish, Muslim, Christian), are manipulated against one another, the speaker advocates for collective humanity above divisive identities.

Historical Context and Personal Reflections

  • The speaker shares personal anecdotes about Holocaust survivors within their own family, grounding their arguments in personal history.
  • Remarkably, they recall tales of victims of fascism and scapegoating, emphasizing the dangers of allowing fear to lead to silence and compliance.
  • A poignant assertion is made that today’s Jews stand against past injustices not merely for themselves but for all marginalized groups, reinforcing the belief that genocide begets genocide unless actively resisted.

Critique of Leadership and Current Events

  • There is a vocal critique of leadership, specifically targeting the Trump Administration, for allegedly supporting extremist ideologies while claiming to combat anti-Semitism.
  • The speaker challenges and calls for a firm rejection of the misappropriation of their identities for political gain, encapsulated in the phrase “get our names out of your mouth.”
  • This reflection highlights the need for accountability in leadership, emphasizing that the fight against oppression requires not only moral resolve but also substantial political courage.

Collective Action and Responsibility

  • Emphasizing a collective responsibility, the speaker articulates that silence in the face of injustice permits oppression to proliferate.
  • An urgent call to action is made, promoting the idea that true solidarity involves staging collective responses against injustice rather than remaining passive observers.
  • Echoing the historical warning, the speaker posits that failing to speak out may lead to future scenarios where voices are stifled completely, thus demanding immediate engagement and advocacy.

A Call for Common Humanity

  • Distinct from religious identities, the speaker envisions a world where collaboration occurs through shared values of humanity rather than through religious or cultural divides.
  • The encouragement to “do it for yourself” is proposed as an individual path toward constructing a more equitable society, stressing that moral action benefits both the individual and the community.
  • The narrative reinforces the idea that awareness and dissent against injustice are not just a moral imperative but also a deeply personal necessity.

Conclusion

This chapter reflects on the critical need for solidarity in the fight against oppression, encouraging diverse communities to reject narratives that foster division. By integrating personal history and broader humanitarian principles, the speaker calls upon individuals to act against prejudice and violence, drawing on their shared experiences to foster a society rooted in mutual respect and understanding. 

The urgency of these sentiments demands not just acknowledgment but proactive engagement—reminding us that our humanity is interwoven and that standing up against injustice is an act of allegiance not merely to one another, but to the collective moral conscience of society. In the words of the speaker, this is not just a call to action; it is a plea for a united stand against the ailment of our time—indifference and division in the face of violence and injustice.

MAJEED: IMF told Iraq Major transaction has to be in DINAR! ‪@DINARREVALUATION‬ #iraqidinarinvestor

 


RESET INTELLIGENCE: PMF Militia Leaves Iraq & CBI Prepares Infrastructure – Signals for Iraqi Dinar Holders

PMF Militia Leaves Iraq & CBI Prepares Infrastructure – Signals for Iraqi Dinar Holders Introduction Recent developments in Iraq show a ...