Well when yoUr country is being accepted into the BRICS Nations you have a lot to worry about as a leader who is involved in money laundering and other corrupt activities.
Did he try to escape? I will ask "The Judges". The President of Iran, Ebrahim Raisi, has been accused of being involved in a corruption scandal worth 1,100 billion tomans related to imports during his 20 months in office. That's a pretty hefty sum, if I do say so myself.
He can no longer prop up the black market. Iran wants to do trade with Iraq. And there will be no parallel market to reduce the value of national currencies to keep corruption afloat. That's why the BRICS are a major threat to central banks.
How much did the “vote price” for the Presidency of Parliament reach during yesterday’s session?
Today, Sunday, an educated political source uncovered the infringement that happened during the meeting to choose the Speaker
of the Place of Delegates held yesterday, while affirming that the cost of one vote arrived at 200 thousand bucks.
In an interview with the, the anonymous source stated that “the disputes and acts of bullying were intentional to obstruct the holding of the third round for the inauguration of the new president” and that “the violations that occurred yesterday were like an auction for buying votes.”
“What happened yesterday reveals Al-Halbousi’s continued efforts to dominate the position of Speaker of Parliament in order not to vote for Al-Issawi, who will represent Al-Halbousi’s most prominent competitor in Anbar,” he continued.
He continued: According to the statement, “the price of one vote has reached 200 thousand dollars,” the funds came from powerful political parties “in order to gain control over the presidency for the remainder of the current parliamentary session.”
In order to avoid a third round, yesterday’s parliament session ended with security intervention to stop fights and fistfights between Sunni political forces. This reveals the dangerous stage of the disputes between Sunni forces.
"Last week, in a letter to the council, Iraqi Prime Minister Mohamed Shia al-Sudani called for the United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI), which has been operational since 2003, to end by December 31, 2025."
Resolution 1770 (2007) was devised to give guidance for Iraq on internal protocols that would enable them to secure a safe environment for their people and become prosperous in the world around them.
The resolution was co-sponsored by:
* United Kingdom
* United States
* Italy
* Slovakia
There will be a meeting at the end of May to discuss the gradual removal of the United Nations' involvement with Iraq. It is believed that they have achieved their goals with Iraq, and they believe Iraq's ability to move forward on their own is showing consistent progress.
The UN's involvement with Iraq has been taking place since 2003. It has been a team of leaders from several Nations engaged in helping Iraq "transition" their political and economic economy into a place whereby their contribution to the world is capable of moving to a level of Independence.
Starting early June, Iraq will be gradually moving into their own. These stages of the independence will be monitored, but their control over their own Nation will increase with each passing day.
Prime Minister Mohamed Shiaa of Sudan chaired today, Sunday, an extraordinary session of the Council of Ministers devoted to discussing the federal general budget schedules for state ministries and institutions, for the year 2024, within the requirements of the Federal General Budget Law No. 13 of 2023, for the years 2023, 2024, 2025.
According to the government statement, {Euphrates News} received a copy of it, which: “The session witnessed the adoption of the tables (A, B, C, D, E, F) and the planned deficit schedule for / 2024, based on Article (77/S) of the Federal Public Budget Law No. (13) of 2023, for the years (2023 2024 2025), and its referral to the House of Representatives.”
“The session also included the approval to re-announce the investment opportunity to implement the Baghdad Metro project, and the Najaf-Holy Karbala train, for an additional month, to ensure that other companies’ offers are obtained and entered to compete with the only offer,” he added.
According to the government statement, the Council approved the exclusion of the company implementing the project of the design and implementation of the Crown Stadium (60,000 spectators), and the project to establish a fence and gates of the Tajiat Sports City, from submitting a letter to ensure the good implementation of the project, according to the letter of the Ministry of Youth and Sports, dated May 19, 2024.
t’s no secret that the now, 10-nation BRICS Alliance will formally take serious measures to create and launch a gold-backed trade currency this year. As of this week, Russian President Vladimir Putin assumed leadership of the BRICS Alliance for one year.
Putin and the Russian Finance Ministry prepared and submitted proposals for a gold-backed trade currency ahead of the BRICS annual summit in 2023.
However, India was formally opposed consideration and China was reluctant as well. As such, the gold currency proposal was not officially included on the BRICS summit agenda for formal discussions
.
Why the VND? Unless some major existential event occurs on a massive geopolitical scale, I see no realistic scenario for 180 nations to unanimously adopt a worldwide gold-backed currency system in the near future.
Now that Russia’s Putin is leading BRICS events and strategic initiatives in 2024, the gold trade currency will most certainly be taken up for Member consideration and debate this year.
Vietnam Applies for BRICS Membership
In 2023, Vietnam, along with fourteen other nations, formally applied for BRICS membership and their application has been officially accepted for consideration.
As far as our RV/GCR is concerned, the single most plausible scenario for the initiation of RV exchanges will begin with BRICS.
Why?
Because unless some major existential event occurs on a massive geopolitical scale, I see no realistic scenario for all 180 nations on the planet to unanimously adopt a worldwide gold/asset-backed currency system in the near future.
As much as I’d like to believe in the mythical NESARA/GESARA tenants being adopted worldwide, much less by the United States, there are serious questions as to the validity, or even the existence of the fabled NESARA program.
How a VND Exchange/RV Would Work for Us
Given that the most plausible and logical way for a country like Vietnam (or Iraq for that matter), to be able to pay for our exchanges at a significantly higher rate than today’s 24,000 VND to $1.00 USD rate, is for the current USD to be significantly devalued against the VND.
Think about it, if foreigners outside of Vietnam are holding many trillions of VND, at a new rate of say 1.00 VND = $0.10 USD (10 US cents), Vietnam would have to come up with literally trillions of US dollars to buy our VND at the new rate.
This is simply economically impossible given Vietnam’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) today is likely around $450 billion.
However, if the VND became directly convertible into a gold-backed global currency, the US dollar, along with all other fiat currencies would be extremely weak by comparison.
This is where the BRICS gold-backed common trade currency comes into play.
If Vietnam becomes a member of the BRICS Alliance, the VND would be directly convertible into the new, BRICS gold-backed trade currency and thus, by extension, the VND we all hold would be directly exchanged into the golden trade currency.
Furthermore, since the USD, Euro, etc., would be near worthless against the BRICS gold currency, we would have tremendous purchasing power in our home countries.
How much purchasing power?
That would depend on the ultimate structure of how BRICS would manage each of its member’s native currency to the new, gold-backed, common trade currency. Consequently, it’s not realistically possible to determine what our VND exchange value would ultimately be at this time.
What About the IQD?
The reason I speculate that the VND would RV before the IQD is simply because there have been no official announcements about Iraq applying to join the BRICS Alliance. I cannot simply state that Iraq has applied without direct evidence.
Certainly, it is highly probable that Iraq is one of those 30 countries. It is also understandable that Iraq (and BRICS) would want to keep Iraq’s application confidential for now given the tenuous, but ongoing relationship between the United States and Iraq.
Also, there is no hard rule that a country must wait for the annual BRICS Summit before it can participate within the BRICS Alliance, and/or utilize its forthcoming gold-backed currency.