I was told by my CBI contact that the currency swap out will happen as they will not hide this event and must inform the citizens (education process, get it?). Yes, they also have to explain the exchange swap-out process and how it will work along with descriptions of the newer lower denominations. The CBI will then post those pictures of the lower denominations my contact told me were taken weeks ago. So, just wait and watch it all play out just as I am describing it.
We don’t need false pretenses to rush the process with lies and deception, just to make money off of our YouTube shows or conference calls.
Are you excited? You should be excited but with FACTUAL knowledge not some decades of old rumors of roller coaster riding every day / every weekend expectations.
Iraqi prime minister Mohammad Shia al-Sudani will make his first official state visit to Washington, D.C. on April 15. The visit, long in the making, comes at a moment when the two countries are renegotiating their relationship. Iraqi factions have attacked U.S. bases on a regular basis, and the fragile ceasefire that holds could be broken at any moment. Sudani and President Joe Biden will discuss the U.S. troop presence in Iraq, as well as other contentious topics, such as the flow of U.S. dollars to Iraq. Century International fellow Sajad Jiyad explains what’s at stake in this visit.
Century International: Why are the Iraqi and U.S. leaders meeting now?
Sajad Jiyad: Sudani has been keen on this meeting for over a year. It was finally scheduled after the White House conditioned it on the major coalition behind the Iraqi government, the Coordination Framework, securing a ceasefire from anti-U.S. groups such as Kata’eb Hezbollah that had targeted U.S. troops in Iraq and Syria. Biden is keen on avoiding any uptick in hostilities going into the election and Sudani is trying to secure an agreement on U.S. troop withdrawal before there is a potential change in the White House.
Century: What is the current military relationship between the United States and Iraq? How many U.S. troops are in the country, and what do they do?
Sajad: There are relatively few American troops in Iraq at this point. There are around 2,500 in the country on an advise-and-assist mission aimed at countering the Islamic State. However, the United States has plenty of assets in Iraq and neighboring countries that it has used to target Iraqi armed factions allied with Iran. This is the most contentious part of the relationship—that the United States acts without permission in Iraq, even when it is responding to attacks against U.S. forces. Iraq mainly uses U.S.-made weaponry, so it needs access to parts and support, without which things like F-16 fighter jets will become nonoperational.
Century: How much does the United States spend on Iraq?
Sajad:The latest defense budget request for Iraq is $500 million for 2025. But when you add the budget of the State Department, aid activities, and indirect contributions through the UN and other international organizations, I would guess the true total annual amount spent by the United States in or on Iraq is more than $1 billion a year.
Century: What’s the timeline of negotiations over the terms of a continuing U.S. military presence in Iraq?
Sajad: Nothing has been announced yet and recent comments by the U.S. ambassador in Baghdad that troop withdrawal is “going to take some time” and needs to be done in “an orderly fashion” suggest that the negotiations will continue for a while. It is unlikely that Biden will want to announce a withdrawal date, and he doesn’t want it to look like he’s being forced out of Iraq. But if Biden wins the election, it’s conceivable that he might stage a winding down of the U.S. military mission in Iraq over two years.
Century: What does Biden want from Sudani?
Sajad: Overall, Biden does not want Iraq to be a headache for him heading into November, and thinks Sudani might be able to help with that. Specifically, Biden wants a guarantee that the Iraqi government will prevent attacks by Iraqi armed groups against U.S. troops and facilities inside Iraq and perhaps Syria. (Iraq-based groups have been known to stage attacks on Syrian territory.) This guarantee is the priority. All the other issues are secondary—things like cutting Iran off from accessing dollars in Iraq and encouraging better ties between Baghdad and Erbil to prevent the breakup of the Kurdistan Regional Government.
Biden wants a guarantee that the Iraqi government will prevent attacks by Iraqi armed groups against U.S. troops and facilities.
Century: How is Iraq responding to U.S. pressure on dollar flows?
All of the revenue from Iraq’s oil sales, which amounts to more than $100 billion a year, is held in an Iraqi government account at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The Iraqi Central Bank then transfers the dollars the government needs, some in cash, to Baghdad for distribution by the Ministry of Finance. The U.S. government has restricted these transfers in the last eighteen months because it says the Iraqi financial system is too open to money laundering and illicit flows of dollars to Iran, other countries, and sanctioned individuals and entities. The Iraqi government has responded by suspending the licenses of some banks, pushing for documentation and auditing of dollar transactions, reducing cash transactions, and limiting the amount of dollars that banks make available for withdrawals.
Century: What does Sudani want from Biden?
Sajad: Sudani wants two things, in particular. The first is an indication of when troop withdrawal could begin and some announcement that heralds an end to the U.S. military mission in Iraq. The U.S. troop presence is a domestic political liability for Sudani, and he needs to show that he has made progress, through negotiations, toward preventing Iraqi armed groups from attacking U.S. interests in Iraq. Second, Sudani wants to avoid any further U.S. action in Iraq—whether that is sanctions against Iraqi leaders and officials, pressure on Iraqi banks and financial activity, or airstrikes against armed groups without the Iraqi government’s permission. Sudani also has a wish list that includes more American investment in Iraq and deals on weapons sales, but it is unlikely that will make it onto the agenda this time around.
Century: Is either leader strong enough, domestically, to negotiate a military alliance?
Sajad: Perhaps, but there are doubts about whether it could be a lasting alliance. Biden has to run for reelection in November, and Sudani is facing reelections at some point next year. Who is to say they will be in power to ensure an alliance actually lasts? That is the cloud under which this meeting is happening—the uncertainty of which direction both governments will be taking over the next eighteen months.
Century: What security interests do Iraq and the United States share?
Sajad: Iraq is essentially dependent on the United States for weapons maintenance and logistics, intelligence sharing, and access to dollars for its economy. It needs to maintain a positive relationship with the United States for its own security.
The United States’ needs aren’t as pressing, but Washington wants to prevent further empowering Iran in Iraq. Keeping American troops in Iraq is considered a form of deterrence. Without American troops there, Washington worries that Iraq could either experience a security vacuum—leading to the rise of an insurgency that spills into the region—or that Baghdad could become more hard-line and more closely aligned with Iran, thereby threatening U.S. interests in the Middle East.
Century: What are the biggest obstacles to the U.S.–Iraqi relationship?
Sajad: The biggest issue is a circular problem of the Iraqi government not being able to prevent attacks against U.S. facilities, and the United States undertaking military action on Iraqi soil in violation of Iraq’s sovereignty. American troop presence will be a point of contention until it is resolved. The current situation is untenable, and Washington understands this. It is trying to find a solution on its own terms and timing.
Century: Any particular political risks to this meeting?
Sajad: The most obvious risk is that, in the lead-up to the meeting, there could be some sort of attack on U.S. troops and facilities inside Iraq and a potential American retaliation. An attack might force a postponement of the state visit—or, more likely, a cancellation.
If Sudani comes back from the meeting without any progress to show on troop withdrawal, it will give his critics in Iraq more incentive to remove him or prevent him from taking a second term in office. It would also lead to more attacks by armed groups against the United States. And if Sudani fails to keep the peace in Iraq there could be military actions that go further than before and seriously damage the bilateral relationship.
For Biden, any sort of concession to the Iraqis could cause a negative reaction in Congress, which could prevent him from following through.
Century: How does the Gaza war affect the Sudani–Biden relationship?
Sajad: The Gaza war adds more risk. Sudani wants the United States to distance itself from Israeli actions and stop providing support to Israel, which would make the United States less of a target in Iraq and Syria. Biden would undoubtedly prefer to focus on how to improve the bilateral relationship between Baghdad and Washington. And Biden doesn’t want Iraq to get drawn into other conflicts, least of all Israel’s war. But a major escalation in the Gaza war, and especially its spread into Lebanon and Syria, would bring tremendous risk to Iraq, and it might not be in the hands of either leader to prevent further conflict.
...Yes, the Iraqi dinar and the future revaluation of it is on the agenda for the April 15th visit of the Iraqi prime minister Al-Sudani to Washington, DC.
....But this is what really gets my goat – Many of these idiot intel gurus out there, namely this jerk from TNT and you know who I mean, is telling everyone that the RV is going to happen prior or on April 15
th. Folks this is simply not true or going to happen. For all you TNT idiots read my lips – “this is pure garbage intel made up in someone’s warped mind once again”.
Its pure speculation without any real evidence or proof to back up this claim. How could the RV possibly happen when in todays’ news we are told that one of the files Al-Sudani is to talk about is the future fate of the dinar. Why would he be going then to talk about the dinar in Washington if they planned to RV prior to his visit.
An economist revealed the most prominent creditors of Iraq.
“The amount of the authorized external debt is approximate, because there are external debt in the form of investment projects such as the construction of hospitals and schools, especially the Japanese International Agency, these have complex accounting treatments in order to be installed in the records of the Ministry of Finance,” Salah Nuri, former director of the Financial Supervision Bureau, told {Euphrates News}. He pointed out that “the most prominent creditors are the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, foreign international agencies, German and Japanese, and Islamic international development funds, and there are no debts to Arab countries after 2003.”
Nouri pointed out that the external debt settlements through the Paris Club agreement ended, and they are related to debt before 2003, and as I know, there are no new consultations, and the rest of them belong mostly to the Gulf countries. He explained, “As for internal debts, the creditor bodies are government banks (Iraqi trade TBI, Mesobia, Al-Rasheed) in addition to the employees’ retirement fund, which is within (60) trillion Iraqi dinars.” On April 8, the Iraqi government announced the reduction of external public debt by more than 50%, reducing the debt from $19.729 billion in late 2022, to $15.976 billion in 2023, reaching nearly $8.9 billion this year.
IRAQI SUPREME MILITARY COMMITTEE AND ITS COUNTERPART AFFILIATED WITH THE INTERNATIONAL COALITION AGREED TO ESTABLISH A FIRM SECURITY PARTNERSHIP WITH THE UNITED STATES
Shafaq News / The spokesman for the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, Major General Yahya Rasool Abdullah, announced on Tuesday evening that the Iraqi Supreme Military Committee and its counterpart affiliated with the international coalition agreed to establish a firm security partnership with the United States.
“The Iraqi Supreme Military Committee held a meeting in the capital Baghdad with the Supreme Military Committee of the International Coalition in Iraq, which is concerned with ending the mission of the international coalition in Iraq,” Abdullah said in a statement received by Shafaq News.
He pointed out that “during the meeting, the work of the subcommittees since their inception in January 2024 was discussed, and the threat of ISIS terrorist gangs was evaluated, the operational environment, the current security situation and the capabilities of the Iraqi security forces.”
The members of the two military committees praised, according to the statement, “the achievements and sacrifices made in the battles to defeat ISIS, and the continuous efforts to prevent the return of these terrorist gangs, as well as support for the sovereignty, unity and stability of Iraq.”
The two sides stressed “the capabilities and capabilities of the Iraqi security forces to defeat ISIS, and also, the continuation of the subcommittees work to present the assessments to the Supreme Military Committee to make recommendations for decision-making regarding the timetable for the transition of the international coalition in Iraq to the establishment of a bilateral security partnership between Iraq and the United States, which contributes to raising the capabilities of the Iraqi security forces and working to develop them, which enhances the stability and security of Iraq and the region.”
(So, why then this visit then to the Washington on Aprill 15th? Is it just to establish good diplomatic relations?)