WHERE ARE THE 2025 BUDGET SCHEDULES? PROJECTS ARE SUSPENDED, PLANS ARE POSTPONED, AND PARLIAMENT HOLDS THE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE.
Despite more than half a year having passed since the start of the fiscal year, the 2025 budget schedules remain absent from the House of Representatives, a scene that rekindles concerns about a financial paralysis that threatens service and development projects in the governorates.
This delay comes despite the country’s adoption of the “Tripartite Budget” law, which was supposed to spare Iraq the annual wait for approval of financial allocations and ensure stability in the flow of funds and project planning.
In this context, the Deputy Chairman of the Parliamentary Committee for Regions and Governorates, Jawad Al-Yasari, ruled out on Tuesday (July 8, 2025) the approval of the 2025 budget schedules during the remaining term of Parliament, holding the government responsible for the delay.
“The Iraqi government is responsible for the delay in approving the 2025 budget schedules, as it has not yet sent them to Parliament for review,” Al-Yasari told Baghdad Today. “We don’t know anything about them yet, and we don’t believe the government is serious about sending them, which is why we rule out approving them within the remaining term of Parliament.”
He added, “This delay has clear consequences, most notably the disruption of the launch of a large number of projects in the governorates, as well as the obstruction of the completion of existing projects that require financial allocations.” He noted that “the government is currently content with paying salaries and outstanding financial obligations, in the absence of schedules and a parliamentary vote on them.”
According to observers, the government’s continued delay in submitting budget schedules reflects confusion in financial planning and a lack of a clear vision regarding spending priorities. This threatens to widen the gap between the central government and the governorates and weaken the state’s ability to fulfill its service and development commitments. It also portends escalating popular discontent in some areas, particularly those that rely on investment allocations for infrastructure development and job creation, at a time when economic and living pressures on citizens are increasing.
