CHANNEL8

Tasnim News Agency reported that Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, heading a high-level parliamentary delegation, will discuss regional developments and strengthen cooperation between Tehran and Baghdad with senior Iraqi officials and leaders.

----

🇮🇶🔥 IRAN, IRAQ & THE BREAKING POINT: WHAT IS REALLY AT STAKE?

📰 NEWS SUMMARY

Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Speaker of Iran’s Parliament, is heading a high-level parliamentary delegation to Baghdad to meet with senior Iraqi officials and leaders.

The stated objective is to discuss regional developments and strengthen cooperation between Tehran and Baghdad.

📌 But the timing of this visit is what immediately catches my attention.

Iraq is approaching September 30, the date by which armed militias operating outside state control are expected to move toward disarmament and dissolution.

And now, precisely during this critical period, Tehran is increasing its political engagement with Baghdad. 🇮🇷👀🇮🇶

---

🇮🇷 ARE WE WATCHING A DESPERATE IRAN?

This is where the analysis begins.

We cannot state as a proven fact that Ghalibaf’s visit is intended to prevent the disarmament of the militias. Additional evidence would be required to establish that.

But the timing is impossible to ignore.

A genuine reduction of the armed structures of pro-Iranian factions inside Iraq would also mean a reduction of one of Tehran’s major mechanisms of political influence inside Iraq.

So the question becomes:

👉 Is Iran trying to preserve its political influence in Baghdad while Iraq prepares to reduce the influence of the militias?

---

🧩 AND THIS IS WHERE AL-MALIKI ENTERS THE PICTURE...

If we look at the situation from this perspective, the political role of figures historically aligned with Iran becomes even more important.

The issue is not simply WHO holds a political position.

The bigger question is:

❗WHO WILL HAVE INFLUENCE OVER THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THE DISARMAMENT TAKES PLACE?

Because there is a massive difference between:

🔴 REAL DISARMAMENT:
Weapons are placed under the exclusive control of the Iraqi state and autonomous armed structures disappear.

🟡 A “COSMETIC” DISARMAMENT:
The same structures retain influence, resources and political leverage, but operate under a different name or institutional formula.

That distinction could be critical for Iraq’s political future.

---

💥 REMEMBER WHAT THE CBI CONTACT SAID

I want everyone to remember something we discussed previously.

According to the information from the CBI Contact, Iranian influence inside Iraq would be a determining factor in whether the “Delete the Zeros” project can move forward.

The message was clear:

🇮🇶 IRAQ MUST ELIMINATE IRANIAN INFLUENCE BEFORE THE DELETE THE ZEROS PROJECT CAN BE ACTIVATED.

⚠️ This is NOT a public statement from the CBI. It should be understood as information attributed to the CBI Contact and something we continue to watch and compare against public developments.

But now...

LOOK AT THE BIGGER PICTURE.

---

🧩 THE PIECES MAY BE CONNECTING

If we temporarily accept that information as one piece of the puzzle, the sequence becomes extremely interesting:

🇮🇷 REDUCTION OF IRANIAN INFLUENCE

⬇️

🪖 DISARMAMENT / DISSOLUTION OF MILITIAS

⬇️

🇮🇶 GREATER SOVEREIGNTY OF THE IRAQI STATE

⬇️

🔒 LESS EXTERNAL INTERFERENCE

⬇️

🏦 POLITICAL CONDITIONS FOR STRATEGIC REFORMS

⬇️

💵 DELETE THE ZEROS

Does this guarantee that this exact sequence will happen?

NO.

But if what the CBI Contact said is accurate, then the events we are watching could be far more important than they appear on the surface.

---

👀 NOW ALL EYES ARE ON AL-ZAIDI

For me, this is THE REAL POINT OF OBSERVATION.

What will Al-Zaidi do?

If he keeps the September 30 timeline firm, insists that weapons truly come under state control, and rejects formulas that simply change the name of the militias...

🔥 THAT WOULD BE A VERY IMPORTANT SIGNAL.

But if we begin to see:

❌ Delays
❌ Exceptions
❌ New “integration” formulas
❌ Parallel structures
❌ Agreements allowing factions to retain autonomy
❌ Political concessions preserving Iranian influence

then we have to ask whether we are witnessing precisely the “cosmetic disarmament” we have been talking about.

---

🎯 THE BIG QUESTION

Is Iran simply strengthening normal cooperation with Iraq?

Or is Tehran attempting to preserve its political influence in Baghdad before Iraq reaches the breaking point?

And most importantly:

🇮🇶🔥 WILL AL-ZAIDI HAVE THE POLITICAL STRENGTH TO SAY “NO” TO THAT PRESSURE?

Because if what the CBI Contact said is correct, the Iranian issue may be much more than geopolitics.

💥 IT COULD BE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO MOVE FORWARD WITH DELETE THE ZEROS.

That is why we watch.

NO RUMORS.
NO EUPHORIA.
FACTS. 👀

🇮🇶💪 IRAQ FIRST.

🔗📢 FOLLOW & JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

📌 TELEGRAM: https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION

📌 X (TWITTER): https://x.com/DinarWatchTeam

📌 BLUESKY: https://bsky.app/profile/dinaresgurus.bsky.social

#Iraq #Iran #AlZaidi #AlMaliki #Ghalibaf #CBI #CBIContact #CentralBankOfIraq #DeleteTheZeros #IraqiDinar #CurrencyReform #MonetaryReform #IraqNews #IraqPolitics #IranInfluence #Militias #Disarmament #Baghdad #Tehran #RV #IQD

🇮🇶 MALIKI AND IRAQ’S WEAPONS: SOVEREIGNTY OR POLITICAL COVER?

 CHANNEL8

Nouri al-Maliki and US Chargé d'Affaires Joshua Harris have discussed efforts to place weapons under state control and strengthen Iraq’s constitutional institutions.

Read more: https://channel8.com/english/news/6

---

🇮🇶 MALIKI AND IRAQ’S WEAPONS: SOVEREIGNTY OR POLITICAL COVER?

NEWS SUMMARY

Nouri al-Maliki and U.S. Chargé d’Affaires Joshua Harris discussed efforts to place weapons under state control and strengthen Iraq’s constitutional institutions.

Maliki is also involved in the Coordination Framework’s efforts to establish a mechanism to advance this process.

🔥 BUT HERE IS WHERE IT GETS INTERESTING...

Why Nouri al-Maliki?

We are talking about the same politician who was Prime Minister during a period marked by serious corruption allegations, growing Iranian influence, and, most importantly, who helped establish the institutional framework that gave legal status to the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) in 2014.

So the question should not simply be:

“Is Maliki now against the militias?”

The real question is:

🇮🇶 WHO WILL CONTROL THE MILITIAS IF THEIR WEAPONS COME UNDER STATE CONTROL?

Because there is a huge difference between:

🇮🇶 STATE CONTROL
➡️ The Prime Minister and constitutional institutions genuinely control the weapons.

And:

🇮🇶 STATE COVER
➡️ Militias are formally integrated into the state while maintaining political influence, networks, and external relationships.

🔥 THIS IS THE KEY POINT

Maliki is not necessarily calling for the dissolution of the PMF.

The argument is more about bringing them under a state structure.

And that creates a very interesting possibility:

MILITIAS
⬇️
PMF
⬇️
STATE INSTITUTION
⬇️
POLITICAL INFLUENCE REMAINS

If that becomes the outcome, this would be less about dismantling the system and more about reorganizing it inside the Iraqi state.

🇮🇷 AND THIS IS WHERE IRAN ENTERS THE PICTURE

We cannot claim that Maliki is acting directly on orders from Iran.

But we also cannot ignore his long-standing political relationship with Tehran and his historical role in Iraq’s Iran-aligned political ecosystem.

That makes his involvement particularly interesting.

🇺🇸 Washington:
“We need weapons under state control.”

🇮🇶 Baghdad:
“We need Iraqi sovereignty.”

🇮🇷 Iran-aligned political networks:
“We need to make sure this transition does not destroy the existing power structure.”

And Maliki could potentially occupy the space between all three.

🎯 THE REAL QUESTION

Are we actually witnessing the creation of a genuine state monopoly on the use of force?

Or are we witnessing a process through which existing armed structures are legalized, institutionalized, and placed inside a new state framework while retaining much of their influence?

Because if the second scenario happens, the outcome could be:

❌ Not: Eliminating militia influence.

But rather:

✅ Integrating them.
✅ Institutionalizing them.
✅ Keeping them inside the political system.
✅ Preserving their networks.
✅ Presenting the process as a victory for Iraqi sovereignty.

🔥 AND THIS IS WHY MALIKI MATTERS

The politician who helped create the architecture behind the PMF is now involved in the process that supposedly seeks to place weapons under state control.

That does not prove a conspiracy.

But it raises a very important question:

🇮🇶 Is Maliki helping Iraq establish genuine state control—or helping reshape the existing militia system so it can survive inside the Iraqi state?

👀 WATCH WHAT HAPPENS NEXT.

The real test will not be Maliki’s statements.

It will be whether this process actually removes:

🔴 Independent chains of command
🔴 Autonomous military decision-making
🔴 External influence
🔴 Independent financing
🔴 Political control by armed factions

If those things remain...

Then “state control” may simply become a new legal framework for an old power structure.

🇮🇶 Iraq’s sovereignty will ultimately be measured not by who signs the agreements, but by who actually controls the weapons.

🔗📢 FOLLOW & JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

📌 TELEGRAM: https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION

📌 X (TWITTER): https://x.com/DinarWatchTeam

📌 BLUESKY: https://bsky.app/profile/dinaresgurus.bsky.social

#Iraq #Maliki #PMF #Iran #IraqPolitics #IraqiSovereignty #Baghdad #MiddleEast #StateControl #Geopolitics

🇮🇶 WHEN THE RV HAPPENS, WHAT RATE WILL THE DINAR OPEN AT? 💵👀🔥

🔗📢 FOLLOW & JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

📌 TELEGRAM: https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION

📌 X (TWITTER): https://x.com/DinarWatchTeam

📌 BLUESKY: https://bsky.app/profile/dinaresgurus.bsky.social

🇮🇶🔥 IRAN, KURDISTAN & CONTROL OF IRAQ: IS A STRONG IRAQ THE REAL THREAT?

 KURDISTAN24

Syrian Tomorrow Current Says Iran Aims to Destabilize Kurdistan

Read More: https://kurdistan24.net/.../syrian-tomorrow-current-says...

----

🇮🇶🔥 IRAN, KURDISTAN & CONTROL OF IRAQ: IS A STRONG IRAQ THE REAL THREAT?

🇮🇷 NEWS: A new drone attack targeting facilities linked to Kurdistan Region Prime Minister Masrour Barzani has once again raised concerns about Iranian influence in Iraq. Kurdish authorities identified Iranian territory as the launch point.

⚠️ But this goes beyond Kurdistan.

If Iran destabilizes both Erbil and Baghdad, it puts pressure on two critical centers of Iraqi power. A weak, divided, corrupt Iraq with multiple centers of power is much easier to influence than a sovereign Iraq with strong institutions and state control over weapons.

💰 And this is where the economic dimension becomes critical:

An Iraq that reduces corruption, strengthens border and customs controls, modernizes its banking system, reduces the parallel economy, strengthens its institutions, attracts foreign investment, and diversifies beyond oil would have far greater independence from Tehran.

🇮🇶 A stronger Iraqi state means:

🔹 Less power for militias
🔹 Less parallel-market activity
🔹 Less external dependence
🔹 Greater control over dollar flows
🔹 Greater economic sovereignty
🔹 More foreign investment
🔹 Stronger integration with the Gulf and the West

🔥 And here is the strategic question:

Iran has incentives to preserve mechanisms of influence within a weak and fragmented Iraq. But the more pressure Iraq faces, the greater the incentive for Baghdad to build a truly sovereign state.

🇮🇶 The real battle may not be purely military.

It may be over the economic, financial, and political future of Iraq.

If Baghdad succeeds in reducing militia influence, fighting corruption, modernizing its financial system, and strengthening economic relations with the U.S. and Gulf countries, Iraq could begin transforming from a battleground between regional powers into a sovereign state capable of negotiating with everyone.

💥 A strong Iraq could fundamentally change the regional balance of power.

🔗📢 FOLLOW & JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

📌 TELEGRAM: https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION

📌 X (TWITTER): https://x.com/DinarWatchTeam

📌 BLUESKY: https://bsky.app/profile/dinaresgurus.bsky.social

#Iraq 🇮🇶 #Iran 🇮🇷 #Kurdistan #Erbil #Baghdad #IraqSovereignty #IraqReforms #CBI #IraqiDinar #EconomicReform #DeDollarization #AntiCorruption #MiddleEast #Geopolitics #Iraq2026

🇮🇶🔥 ERBIL UNDER ATTACK: WILL BAGHDAD STAND FIRM?

 CHANNEL8

Ali Faleh al-Zaidi, Prime Minister and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, directed that “the findings of the investigation be made public as quickly as possible, exposing all circumstances surrounding the attack and the entities behind it.”

----

🇮🇶🔥 ERBIL UNDER ATTACK: WILL BAGHDAD STAND FIRM?

📢 NEWS SUMMARY

Two drones targeted the office of Kurdistan Region Prime Minister Masrour Barzani and the residence of the region’s security chief in Erbil. Kurdish authorities said the drones originated from Iranian territory. No casualties were reported. (The New Region)

🇮🇶 Prime Minister Ali Faleh al-Zaidi ordered an investigation to identify the launch points, determine the circumstances, and reveal those responsible, directing that the findings be made public as quickly as possible. (Shafaq News)

🔥 BUT HERE IS WHERE THE STORY GETS MUCH MORE INTERESTING...

Why Erbil?

Why not Baghdad?

One possible strategic objective could be to create tension between Erbil and Baghdad.

The potential scenario would look like this:

ATTACK ERBIL 🇮🇶
⬇️
ERBIL DEMANDS ACTION FROM BAGHDAD
⬇️
BAGHDAD RESPONDS TOO SLOWLY
⬇️
KURDISH FRUSTRATION GROWS
⬇️
TRUST BETWEEN ERBIL & BAGHDAD WEAKENS

And that could benefit any actor that does not want to see a stronger, more unified Iraqi state.

🇮🇶 BUT LOOK AT WHAT IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW

Baghdad and Erbil are actually moving in the opposite direction.

🤝 Greater security coordination
🚧 Joint border-security efforts
💻 ASYCUDA implementation
💰 Unified customs procedures
🛢️ Cooperation on oil and revenues
🔍 Joint efforts against smuggling and unofficial crossings

Just days before the attack, Iraqi and Kurdish officials were strengthening coordination on border security and combating smuggling. (الشرق الأوسط)

And the ASYCUDA agreement represents a major step toward unified customs procedures and greater federal oversight of revenues. (964media)

🔥 THAT CHANGES THE CONTEXT.

If someone wanted to weaken Baghdad–Erbil cooperation, creating insecurity in Erbil could be an effective way to put pressure on that relationship.

🎯 THE REAL QUESTION: WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

If Erbil begins thinking:

“Baghdad says we are part of Iraq, but can Baghdad actually protect us?”

then political tensions could grow.

That is why Al-Zaidi’s response matters so much.

By ordering the investigation and demanding that the findings be made public, Baghdad is potentially sending a very important message:

🇮🇶 “An attack on Erbil is an attack on Iraqi territory—and the Iraqi state will determine who is responsible.”

That is very different from treating this as merely a Kurdish regional problem.

🇮🇷 AND WHAT ABOUT IRAN?

The KRG says the drones originated from Iranian territory. That is significant, but we must distinguish between where the drones came from and who ultimately ordered the attack.

It would therefore be premature to say:

❌ “Iran ordered this attack specifically to divide Baghdad and Erbil.”

But we can analyze the potential strategic effect:

If an outside actor wants to prevent deeper Baghdad–Erbil integration, destabilizing Erbil could create exactly the kind of political friction that would undermine that cooperation.

🔥 AND HERE IS THE IRONY...

The attack could potentially produce the opposite effect.

If Al-Zaidi responds firmly:

ATTACK ON ERBIL 🇮🇶
⬇️
BAGHDAD RESPONDS
⬇️
GREATER SECURITY COORDINATION
⬇️
STRONGER FEDERAL BORDER CONTROL
⬇️
LESS ROOM FOR MILITIAS & EXTERNAL ACTORS
⬇️
STRONGER BAGHDAD–ERBIL INTEGRATION 🇮🇶🔥

And that connects directly to the ASYCUDA story.

💡 MY TAKE

The most important question is not only who launched the drones.

The bigger question is:

🇮🇶 HOW WILL THE IRAQI STATE RESPOND?

If Baghdad successfully identifies those responsible, protects Erbil, strengthens border control, and continues integrating security and economic systems with the Kurdistan Region, this attack could ultimately strengthen Iraqi sovereignty rather than weaken it.

And that would be a very different outcome from what a destabilizing actor might have intended.

👀 Watch Baghdad’s response.

Because right now, the real battle may be bigger than Erbil.

It may be about who controls Iraq’s borders, security, money—and ultimately, Iraq’s sovereignty. 🇮🇶🔥

🔗📢 FOLLOW & JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

📌 TELEGRAM: https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION

📌 X (TWITTER): https://x.com/DinarWatchTeam

📌 BLUESKY: https://bsky.app/profile/dinaresgurus.bsky.social

#Iraq #IraqiDinar #IQD #Erbil #Baghdad #Kurdistan #Iran #AliAlZaidi #MasrourBarzani #ASYCUDA #Iraq2026 #IraqiSovereignty #Geopolitics #MiddleEast #IraqEconomy

💥 MNT GOAT: Is Iraq Setting the Stage for a Major Dinar Reform in 2027? 🇮🇶🔥

 

🔗📢 FOLLOW & JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

📌 TELEGRAM: https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION

📌 X (TWITTER): https://x.com/DinarWatchTeam

📌 BLUESKY: https://bsky.app/profile/dinaresgurus.bsky.social

🇮🇶🔥 ASYCUDA: THE BEGINNING OF A NEW ERA BETWEEN BAGHDAD & ERBIL?

 CHANNEL8

Kurdistan Region border crossings will be placed under the international ASYCUDA electronic customs system, replacing existing manual procedures for customs revenue collection. The project officially begins on October 1.

Read more: https://channel8.com/english/news/63933

---

🇮🇶🔥 ASYCUDA: THE BEGINNING OF A NEW ERA BETWEEN BAGHDAD & ERBIL?

📢 NEWS SUMMARY

Starting October 1, border crossings in the Kurdistan Region will begin using ASYCUDA, the international electronic customs management system developed by UNCTAD/UN, replacing the current manual procedures.

🇮🇶 The project will digitize and standardize customs operations, improve revenue controls, and strengthen oversight of commercial activity.

The agreement also provides for 50% of the region’s customs revenues to be deposited into the Federal Treasury.

It also includes the restructuring of tariff classifications according to international standards and the closure of unofficial border crossings.

🔥 BUT THIS IS WHERE THE STORY GETS MUCH MORE INTERESTING...

The truly important part may not be ASYCUDA itself.

The important part is that Baghdad and Erbil are working together to implement a national customs-management system.

And that raises a major question:

🤔 Could ASYCUDA become a precedent for future national projects jointly developed and implemented by Baghdad and Erbil?

🇮🇶 BAGHDAD + ERBIL: A NEW MODEL OF COOPERATION?

ASYCUDA represents much more than simply digitizing customs.

We have:

➡️ Baghdad + Erbil
➡️ A common system
➡️ Common procedures
➡️ Greater revenue transparency
➡️ Joint oversight
➡️ Fiscal integration

This is important because one of Iraq’s biggest challenges for years has been the lack of coordination between the Federal Government and the Kurdistan Regional Government.

Now we are seeing signs that both sides are trying to resolve certain issues through joint institutional mechanisms.

🔥 AND THIS IS WHERE THE HCL COMES INTO THE PICTURE

This is where the comparison becomes very interesting.

🇮🇶 ASYCUDA

➡️ Baghdad + Erbil
➡️ Common system
➡️ Common procedures
➡️ Revenue control
➡️ Transparency
➡️ Fiscal integration

🛢️ HCL — HYDROCARBON LAW

➡️ Baghdad + Erbil
➡️ Common federal framework for oil and gas
➡️ Rules governing production and exports
➡️ Revenue distribution
➡️ Transparency
➡️ Permanent institutional mechanism

Do you see the pattern? 👀

The HCL remains one of the major outstanding issues between Baghdad and Erbil, along with revenue-sharing.

That is why ASYCUDA could be showing us something much bigger:

💡 Baghdad and Erbil are gaining practical experience in creating and implementing joint mechanisms to manage revenues and resources at the national level.

🏛️ ARE WE SEEING A SHIFT IN THE MODEL?

Perhaps the story is not simply:

“Baghdad allowed Kurdistan to use ASYCUDA.”

But rather:

“Baghdad and Erbil are beginning to solve national issues through joint mechanisms.”

🔥 THAT DISTINCTION IS HUGE.

Because we are no longer talking only about politics.

We are talking about:

💰 revenue
🛢️ oil
📊 oversight
💻 digitalization
🏦 state income
🤝 institutional coordination

And this pattern is beginning to appear in other areas as well.

🛢️ OIL: ANOTHER PIECE OF THE PUZZLE

In March 2026, Baghdad and Erbil agreed to establish a joint committee between the Federal Ministry of Oil and the KRG Ministry of Natural Resources to advance oil exports and return revenues to the Federal Treasury.

That gives us a structure worth watching:

ASYCUDA → CUSTOMS REVENUE

JOINT COMMITTEES → OIL & EXPORTS

PERMANENT COORDINATION → DISPUTE RESOLUTION

And then comes the big question:

🔥 HCL → A DEFINITIVE FRAMEWORK FOR OIL, GAS & REVENUES?

🇮🇶 WHY COULD THIS BE SO IMPORTANT?

Because the HCL would not simply be another law.

A federal hydrocarbons law could establish a clearer framework for:

🛢️ production
🛢️ exports
💰 revenues
📊 distribution
🏛️ federal and regional authorities
🤝 Baghdad–Erbil relations

And these have been some of the most difficult issues to resolve for years.

Therefore, if Baghdad and Erbil successfully implement ASYCUDA, maintain oil cooperation, and establish joint mechanisms that work in practice, they could be building the trust and administrative precedents needed to tackle much more difficult agreements.

⚠️ BUT LET'S BE REALISTIC

ASYCUDA does NOT mean the HCL has already been agreed upon.

It also does not mean HCL approval is imminent.

The dispute over oil, authority, and revenue-sharing has existed for many years, and significant differences remain.

But that does not diminish the importance of what we are seeing.

🔥 MY OPTIMISTIC TAKE

Perhaps the most important part of ASYCUDA is not the software.

Perhaps it is the precedent.

For the first time, we are seeing Baghdad and Erbil move forward together on infrastructure that directly affects:

💰 revenues
📊 oversight
💻 digitalization
🌍 international trade
🏛️ fiscal integration

And if this model continues to expand...

ASYCUDA → FISCAL COOPERATION → OIL COOPERATION → ECONOMIC INTEGRATION → HCL

🇮🇶🔥 Could ASYCUDA be one of the first pieces of a much larger process of economic integration between Baghdad and Erbil?

That remains to be proven.

But 2026 is showing a growing number of joint mechanisms between Baghdad and Erbil that deserve close attention.

👀 And if I had to choose the next major indicator to watch, it would be this:

🔥 Can they turn this administrative and fiscal cooperation into a permanent political and legal agreement covering oil, gas, and revenues?

If the answer eventually becomes YES...

🇮🇶💰 the HCL could become one of the most important pieces of Iraq’s entire economic integration process.

🔗📢 FOLLOW & JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

📌 TELEGRAM: https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION

📌 X (TWITTER): https://x.com/DinarWatchTeam

📌 BLUESKY: https://bsky.app/profile/dinaresgurus.bsky.social

#Iraq #IraqiDinar #IQD #Baghdad #Erbil #Kurdistan #ASYCUDA #HCL #HydrocarbonLaw #IraqEconomy #EconomicReform #FiscalReform #OilAndGas #MonetaryReform #BankingReform #Iraq2026 #DinarRV