Sunday, April 6, 2025
PM: Four measures to address the impact of the US tariff increase, 6 APRIL
PM: Four measures to address the impact of the US tariff increase
INA - BAGHDAD
PM Muhammed S. Al-Sudani chaired a meeting on Saturday to discuss the economic and commercial implications of the US government's decision to increase customs tariffs.
The meeting reviewed the economic and trade implications of the decision by the United States government to increase customs tariffs on imports from various countries, the resulting effects on the global economy and crude oil prices, as well as the potential impact on the Iraqi economy, according to a statement by the PM Media Office - received by the Iraqi News Agency - INA.
They handled the data provided by the Ministry of Trade, which revealed that the U.S. tariff increases on Iraqi goods were based on the trade balance disparity between the two countries and not due to customs duties imposed by Iraq on American goods.
The data further indicated that the majority of Iraq’s imports of U.S. goods are routed through markets in third countries due to specific commercial practices followed by American companies in their dealings with Iraq.
"In light of this, and to ensure the best course for the growth of the Iraqi economy, PM Al-Sudani directed that necessary measures be taken in line with the higher interests of the national economy," included in the statement.
The measures included the following:
1. Work on developing trade relations by opening channels for U.S. distributors and commercial agencies, activating Iraqi commercial agencies, and facilitating direct trade between corresponding sectors in Iraq and the United States.
2. Enhance banking services between the financial and banking sectors of Iraq and the United States to ensure the achievement of mutual economic interests.
3. Instruct the negotiation team engaging with the U.S. side to review the foundations of the trade relationship with the aim of improving it and ensuring a balanced economic and trade partnership that serves the mutual interests of both sides.
4. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Finance, and the Ministry of Trade, along with relevant stakeholders, will initiate dialogue with their respective American counterparts to strengthen trade relations, monitor financial markets and economic consulting firms, and submit weekly reports to the Prime Minister’s Office.
NADER FROM MID EAST: Former Iraqi diplomat Gazi Fisizel confirms U.S. calls for the liberation of Iraq align with Trump administration strategies, 6 APRIL
NADER FROM MID EAST: Liberation of a rock I’ve been saying that forever nobody believe me there we go
Highlights
Summary
In a recent statement dated April 5, 2025, former Iraqi diplomat Gazi Fisizel affirmed that U.S. calls for the liberation of Iraq are aligned with the strategic vision set forth by President Donald Trump’s administration.
Fisizel clarified that Republican Representative Wilson’s remarks regarding the liberation of Iraq are not baseless but rather highlight a carefully crafted strategy aimed at addressing Iran’s role in Iraq,
which the U.S. designates as a terrorist state and a major supporter of terrorism. He noted that Iran’s influence is significant, with armed factions in Iraq operating parallel to the official state and forming alliances with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard.
According to Fisizel, the increasing rhetoric surrounding Iraq’s liberation may signal impending actions from Washington as tension escalates between the U.S. and Iran.
This narrative illustrates a broader concern regarding Iran’s dominance in the Middle East and the possibilities for U.S. intervention can shift with rising pressures.
The discussion around the liberation project is indicative of the growing urgency among some American officials to confront Iran’s extensive influence in the region, suggesting a potential evolution in U.S. policy regarding Iraq and its neighboring states.
- 🇺🇸 Former Iraqi diplomat Gazi Fisizel confirms U.S. calls for the liberation of Iraq align with Trump administration strategies.
- ⏳ Republican representative Wilson’s statements are rooted in a larger U.S. agenda rather than spontaneous rhetoric.
- 🛡️ U.S. categorizes Iran as a terrorist state, influencing its approach to Iraq.
- 📈 Armed factions in Iraq have grown into a parallel force aligned with Iran, complicating U.S. interests.
- ⚠️ Calls for liberation may foreshadow significant U.S. actions in light of escalating tensions with Iran.
- 🔄 The rhetoric indicates a potential shift in U.S. policy toward Iraq and its regional stance.
- 🤔 Ongoing discussions reflect a heightened sense of urgency within U.S. political circles regarding Iran.
Key Insights
🔍 Strategic Alignment of U.S. Policies:
Gazi Fisizel’s comments highlight a significant trend in U.S. foreign policy. With claims that calls for the liberation of Iraq are rooted in a strategic vision from the Trump administration, it suggests that such rhetoric is part of a larger framework focused on countering Iranian influence in the region. This implies that U.S. foreign policy is not merely reactive but is actively designed to reshape power dynamics within Iraq and surrounding territories.🌍 Iran as a Central Player in Regional Security:
The characterization of Iran as the “world’s foremost sponsor of terrorism” by U.S. officials indicates an understanding of Iran’s pivotal role in Middle Eastern geopolitics. This viewpoint underscores that any U.S. initiative regarding Iraq would ultimately be informed by the necessity to undermine Iran’s influence, which is viewed as a destabilizing factor in the region.🛠️ Armed Factions’ Power Dynamics:
Fisizel’s description of armed factions representing a “parallel” state in Iraq points to a significant challenge for official governance. This situation complicates U.S. military and diplomatic efforts, as these factions, while operationally distinct from governmental authority, may wield considerable power on the ground. Their strategic alliances with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard reflect a deeper connection that could impede U.S. interests in stabilizing Iraq under a pro-Western government.🚨 Potential for U.S. Escalation:
The notion that the liberation project may lead to decisive U.S. actions signals that policymakers are contemplating escalatory steps beyond rhetoric. This raises the prospect that Washington is preparing for a more robust military or diplomatic intervention to reassert control over Iraqi stability, depending on the evolutive nature of U.S.-Iran relations.📦 Shift in U.S. Policy Framework:
Observing the ongoing discussions surrounding the liberation of Iraq is crucial, as they might indicate a transition in U.S. foreign policy posturing. Should the U.S. amplify its engagement in Iraq, it could lead to broader ramifications for U.S. policies in the Middle East, suggesting an intention to reintegrate Iraq into their sphere of influence while countering Iran’s geopolitical maneuvers.🗣️ Political Discourses Reflect Urgency:
The urgency reflected in the statements from Republican representatives underscores a broader shift in policy dialogue among U.S. officials. The fact that some are publicly advocating for escalated actions against Iran suggests a pervasive concern that could mobilize further political and military resources to the region, potentially impacting Iraq’s future governance.📢 Bipartisan Concerns About Iranian Influence:
The discussion around Iraq’s liberation project transcends party lines, as both Republican and potentially Democratic officials may increasingly view Iran as a threat. This bipartisan recognition may open avenues for collaborative policymaking aimed at addressing the perceived Iranian encroachment, leading to a concerted approach in stabilizing Iraq and potentially engaging more aggressively with Iranian interests.
In conclusion, Gazi Fisizel’s observations encapsulate a critical moment where U.S. foreign policy is undergoing significant scrutiny regarding its relationship with Iraq and Iran. As the narrative intensifies, it suggests that the dynamics of U.S. engagement in Iraq will likely evolve, affecting not only the immediate political landscape of Iraq but also the broader geopolitical climate in the Middle East. As these developments unfold, they warrant close attention from scholars, policymakers, and citizens alike.
Al-Sudani chairs a meeting to discuss the economic and trade implications of the US decision to increase customs tariffs, 6 APRIL
Al-Sudani chairs a meeting to discuss the economic and trade implications of the US decision to increase customs tariffs
A statement from his media office stated that the meeting reviewed digital data issued by the Ministry of Trade, which reveals that the percentage of the increase in US customs tariffs on Iraqi goods was based on the difference in the trade balance between the two countries, and not because of the customs duties imposed by Iraq on US goods.
The statement added: "Through the Ministry of Trade data, it became clear that the majority of Iraq's imports of US goods are made through the markets of other countries, as a result of certain policies followed by US companies in their commercial dealings with Iraq."
It continued: "In light of this information, and in order to ensure the best path for developing the Iraqi economy, Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani directed that the necessary measures be taken, in accordance with the supreme interests of the Iraqi economy; As follows:
1. Work to develop mutual trade relations by opening outlets for distributors and American commercial agencies, activating Iraqi commercial agencies, and engaging in direct trade between sectors operating in the United States.
2. Work to develop banking services between the banking and financial sectors in Iraq and the United States, ensuring mutual economic interests.
3. Direct the negotiating team with the American side to review the foundations of the trade relationship with the United States, with the aim of improving it and ensuring balanced economic and trade relations that safeguard mutual interests and foster a positive partnership.
4. The Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Finance, and Trade, along with relevant stakeholders, will undertake to open a dialogue with the American sector counterpart, ensuring the strengthening of trade relations, monitoring financial markets and economic expertise, and submitting weekly reports to the Prime Minister's Office./ End
GEM FINCH : Similarly when we move our funds we’ll move for the first six months to our primary account !!, 6 APRIL
GEM FINCH
Similarly when we move our funds we’ll move for the first six months to our primary account - so estimate what you will need to last you for 60 days.
Then on the 63rd day you’ll have access to ALL of it – the one good thing about leaving money in the QFS account is no one knows how much you have in there –
yesterday the 31st was the day of the digitalization and designed where the banks can no longer be able to see your balance in your bank accounts and not visible by the banks – and that is good.
So if you do move millions that’s good and also the banks are not supposed to use our money – but how are the banks supposed to make money - answered with they will offer speciality services with high net individuals. Like setting up of Trusts –
the other thing the bank will pick up 02.5% on our transactions and the person in the RC will also pick up that same rate to help us with that exchange- but it’s not meant to come off our balance.
So if you look at the value of the Zim – this is a considerable amount and very REAL Money. They are also getting into Real Estate and Insurance and also buying and selling crypto coins and all the coins are gold backed and if you want to sell at the time of your exchange XRP Solarno and Guardarno and Bitcoin and Eutherieum.
And this has been decided recently. So banks are High Wealth Management and there is a big shake up of the banks going on so the QFS and Blockchain and FINTEC and Starlink – they are all connected along with that Qphone -
so that will be very interesting and you are supposed to get one if you are a ZIM Holder – Bruce doesn’t know how or what if anything it might cost yet?
Might be that Tmobile is carrier.
Bruce now saying that the fires were not natural but were DS fires that were set, as in Myrtle Beach and that area around there.
That is where that stands on the banking and crypto – but tomorrow being Liberation Day - it seems as if the DOGE which starts Wednesday Thursday Friday – and some may go out by cheque.
But most of us by Direct Deposit - What else – could we get an announcement about Nesara and Gesara – quite possible we should.
We know the USN is part of Nesara and No state or Federal income taxes – but it cannot all come out instantly
- but our asset backed currency and the USTN the paper money is out already and RC and banks have it in the vaults ready for us but we don’t know exactly when but when we go for our exchanges we should be able to get some of that at the RC and the amount has changed and they are trying to get more to the RC so probably $2,000 or three thousand.
Two source saying we should received our notifications by or around Noon tomorrow and that would bring that day into a whole new light- so we could set our appointments and start our exchanges on Thursday.
Bruce had hoped to have them today but that did not happen – but we might well have a Celebration Call on Thursday so a short call on Thursday – and Now Bruce is again talking about Sue and those courses that are still available.
-
Bank appointment for Currency EXCHANGE Instructions/Checklist Bank Name_________________________________________ Bank 800#____________...
-
Frank26 [Bank story] This time we didn't go down, we just called [the bank]... We said we want to see if we can exchange some cu...
-
When the safelink website email address comes out follow instructions The Powers that be have the email addresses of everyone who has bo...