Showing posts sorted by relevance for query JEFF. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query JEFF. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, December 25, 2025

🔍 Jeff Intel Update: Can Iraq Change the Rate Without a Fully Formed Government?

 🇮🇶 Jeff Intel Analysis: Government Formation vs Currency Rate Change

One of the most frequently asked questions in the Iraqi Dinar community was directly addressed by Jeff in his latest intel commentary:

Does Iraq need a fully formed and completed government before changing the currency rate?

Jeff’s answer brings clarity, logic, and historical context to a topic surrounded by confusion.


❓ The Key Question Answered

“Do they have to have a fully formed completed government to change the rate?”

Jeff’s response is clear:

➡️ That is questionable — and not necessarily required.


🏛️ Caretaker Government Explained

Jeff explains that while Iraq’s government is still in the formation phase, it operates as a caretaker government.

What does that mean?

  • The caretaker government:

    • Has limited access to Iraq’s funds

    • Has restricted authority over spending

  • However, this does NOT limit the Central Bank

This distinction is crucial.


🏦 Central Bank of Iraq (CBI): Fully Autonomous

Jeff emphasizes a critical fact often misunderstood:

The Central Bank of Iraq can change the value of the currency whenever it wants.

Why?

Because the CBI is autonomous:

  • It operates separately from the physical government

  • It does not require parliamentary approval

  • It does not depend on cabinet completion

This autonomy gives the CBI full authority over:

  • Exchange rates

  • Monetary policy

  • Currency valuation


🔄 Does a Completed Government Matter?

Jeff is transparent:

“We have no way of verifying that a fully completed government is required.”

There is no confirmed rule, legal requirement, or precedent that says Iraq must wait for:

  • A seated prime minister

  • A fully voted cabinet

  • A completed parliamentary structure


🌍 What Really Happened Last Weekend?

Jeff offers a powerful interpretation of recent events:

🏆 A “Graduation Ceremony” Moment

He describes last weekend as:

  • public graduation ceremony

  • Iraq achieving:

    • Sovereignty

    • Stability

  • Officially announced to the world by the United Nations

Why Is This Important?

According to Jeff:

  • The UN announcement was the final global signal

  • This recognition was necessary before the rate could change

  • Once announced, the pathway was cleared


💱 Jeff’s Opinion: The Rate Has Already Changed

Jeff concludes with a strong statement:

“IMO, it did. It happened last weekend.”

In his view:

  • The monetary shift is already complete

  • Any delay now is procedural, not structural

  • The world has been officially notified


📈 Why This Intel Matters for Dinar Watchers

Jeff’s explanation confirms several key points:

  • Currency reform is monetary, not political

  • The CBI holds the power, not parliament

  • Sovereignty recognition is more important than cabinet votes

  • Public UN acknowledgment is a major trigger event


⭐ Featured Snippets 

Does Iraq need a fully formed government to change the dinar rate?
No. According to Jeff, the Central Bank of Iraq is autonomous and can change the currency rate independently of government formation.

Who controls Iraq’s currency value?
The Central Bank of Iraq controls the currency value and operates separately from the physical government.

What was the significance of last weekend?
Jeff believes Iraq’s sovereignty and stability were publicly recognized by the UN, clearing the way for the rate change.


❓ Q&A Section

Q: Can a caretaker government approve a rate change?
A: The caretaker government does not need to approve it. The CBI has full authority.

Q: Is there proof a full government is required?
A: No verified rule or confirmation exists.

Q: Why does the UN announcement matter?
A: It publicly signals global recognition of Iraq’s sovereignty and readiness.

Q: Has the rate already changed?
A: In Jeff’s opinion, yes — it occurred last weekend.


🔥 Hashtags

#JeffIntel
#IraqDinar
#CBIAutonomy
#DinarRate
#IraqSovereignty
#CurrencyReform
#GlobalReset
#RVIntel


🔗 Official DinaRevaluation Community Links

🌐 Blog:
👉 https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/

📲 Telegram:
👉 https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION

📘 Facebook:
👉 https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064023274131

🐦 Twitter / X:
👉 https://x.com/DinaresGurus

▶️ YouTube:
👉 https://www.youtube.com/@DINARREVALUATION


✅ Final Thoughts

Jeff’s intel removes one of the biggest mental roadblocks in this journey.

The CBI is ready.
The world has been notified.
And politics is no longer the gatekeeper.

Stay grounded, stay informed, and stay ready.

Jeff 

  Question:  "Do they have to have a fully formed completed government to change the rate?"

  That's questionable.  While the government is in a forming state, they're considered a 'caretaker'.  They have very limited access to Iraq funds and monies...The Central Bank can change the value of the currency whenever they want. 

 Why Because the central bank is autonomous separate from the physical government...

Do they have to have a formed completed government before the rate can change?  

We have no way of verifying that.

 What happened last weekend was like a graduation ceremony of achieving sovereignty and stability that had to be publicly announced to the world by the UN before the rate could change, IMO, and it did.  It happened last weekend.

Sunday, January 11, 2026

Jeff Clarifies Iraq’s Exchange Rate Confusion: The 1310 Rate, Misleading Claims, and Why Change Is Inevitable

Featured Snippet 

Jeff confirms that Iraq’s current official exchange rate remains at 1310 IQD per USD on the Central Bank website, calling recent claims about a 1300-based 2026 budget misleading while emphasizing that Iraq’s own actions make a future rate change unavoidable.


Jeff’s Iraq Monetary Reality Check

In a space often filled with speculation and confusion, Jeff delivers a grounded and direct clarification regarding Iraq’s exchange rate, the 2026 budget, and recent commentary circulating within the dinar community.

His message is clear: not everything being said is accurate—and context matters.


The Truth About the 2026 Budget and the 1300 Rate

Jeff addressed claims suggesting Iraq’s 2026 budget would be calculated using a 1300 IQD per USD exchange rate, stating plainly:

“They said the 2026 budget would be calculated off of currency valued at 1310 per US dollar.”

He went on to dismiss recent chatter outright:

“Thursday’s comments are misleading garbage.”

According to Jeff, there is no official movement toward a 1300-based budget at this time.


What the CBI Website Actually Shows

Jeff emphasized an important and verifiable point:

“The rate right now on the central bank’s website live… is still at 1310.”

This matters because:

  • The CBI website reflects the official rate

  • No formal change has been implemented yet

  • Claims of an active 1300 rate are premature

“They are misleading you guys. There isn’t a ‘26 budget coming forward at 1300.”


However—Why the Rate Still Must Change

Despite correcting misinformation, Jeff made a crucial distinction:

“Based on Iraq’s actions they have to change the rate. They absolutely have to change the rate based on their actions alone.”

This highlights a key reality:

  • Iraq’s economic reforms

  • Infrastructure spending

  • International trade positioning

  • Budgetary mechanics

All require a future exchange rate adjustment to remain sustainable.

In other words, timing is the issue—not necessity.


A Warning to the Community: Dig Deeper

Jeff offered a sober reminder:

“You can’t trust everything out of Iraq. Sometimes you have to dive in deeper.”

This statement underscores:

  • The complexity of Iraqi politics

  • Conflicting narratives from officials

  • The importance of verifying sources and data

Surface-level headlines often fail to reflect real policy mechanics.


Why This Perspective Is Important

Jeff’s analysis serves as a balancing force by:

  • Correcting false expectations

  • Reinforcing factual data (1310 rate)

  • Acknowledging inevitable reform without hype

This type of clarity helps the community remain informed, patient, and realistic.


Q&A: Jeff’s Exchange Rate Clarification

Q: Is Iraq currently using a 1300 exchange rate?

A: No. According to Jeff, the official CBI rate remains at 1310 IQD per USD.

Q: Is the 2026 budget based on 1300?

A: No. Claims suggesting that are misleading.

Q: Will Iraq eventually change the rate?

A: Yes. Jeff believes Iraq’s actions make a future rate change unavoidable.

Q: Why is there so much confusion?

A: Conflicting statements, political messaging, and incomplete reporting contribute to misinformation.


What to Watch Going Forward

  • Official CBI announcements

  • Budget framework updates

  • Economic reform implementation

  • Verified exchange rate postings

  • Continued analysis from Jeff and trusted sources


Final Thoughts

Jeff’s message is not pessimistic—it’s precise.

The rate has not changed yet, despite rumors.
But Iraq’s economic trajectory makes it inevitable.

Understanding the difference between what is happening now and what must happen next is essential.


Stay Connected & Informed

🔗 Blog: https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/
📢 Telegram: https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION
📘 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064023274131
🐦 Twitter / X: https://x.com/DinaresGurus
▶️ YouTube: 
https://www.youtube.com/@DINARREVALUATION


Hashtags

#JeffUpdate #IraqDinar #IQD #CBI #ExchangeRate
#DinarRevaluation #IraqBudget #ForexNews
#MonetaryPolicy #FinancialReality #EconomicReform

Jeff   

They said the 2026 budget would be calculated off of currency valued at 1310 per US dollar...Thursday's comments are misleading garbage...The rate right now on the central banks' website live...is still at 1310.  They are misleading you guys. There isn't a '26 budget coming forward at 1300. 

 It's not happening...Based on Iraq's actions they have to change the rate.  They absolutely have to change the rate based on their actions alone...You can't trust everything out of Iraq.  Sometimes you have to dive in deeper...

Monday, December 29, 2025

JEFF: Iraq Update: Hidden Timelines, Diplomatic Signals, and the Next Stage of Monetary Reform

Introduction: Why This Jeff Commentary Stands Out

In a recent update, Jeff raised an important question many observers quietly share:
Is critical information about Iraq’s monetary transition being intentionally withheld?

Rather than focusing on rate predictions, Jeff directs attention to patterns in communication, diplomatic timing, and language used by officials—all of which may offer insight into how close Iraq is to its next economic stage.

This article breaks down those observations and explains why hidden timelines are not unusual during sensitive international transitions.


Are Key Details Being Withheld From the Public?

Jeff’s Core Assertion

“Are they hiding anything from us? Absolutely.”

According to Jeff, the issue is not whether information is being shared, but how selectively it is being disclosed.

He emphasizes that:

This selective disclosure is often seen during high-level diplomatic and financial transitions.


Focus on Diplomatic Activity: Why It Matters

The Role of Mark Savaya

Jeff highlights official statements regarding Mark Savaya, described as a U.S. envoy connected to Iraq.

Public updates revealed:

  • Initial reports: travel planned shortly after Christmas

  • Later update (December 25): travel shifted to “early January”

  • No exact date provided

Why the Date Matters

Jeff notes that officials appear to be:

  • Avoiding specificity

  • Adjusting timelines publicly

  • Reframing schedules without explanation

This behavior suggests intentional flexibility, not confusion.


“The Next Stage”: A Critical Phrase

One of the most important clues Jeff identifies is the phrase:

“The next stage.”

Officials reportedly used this language when discussing the envoy’s mission.

Why This Phrase Is Significant

Historically, “next stage” has been associated with:

  • Transition phases

  • International integration

  • Policy implementation milestones

Jeff believes this aligns with the period when Iraq begins operating more fully on the international stage.


Why Hide the Timeline?

Jeff stresses that hiding dates is not accidental.

Possible reasons include:

  • Preventing market speculation

  • Avoiding political interference

  • Managing diplomatic sensitivity

  • Allowing flexibility during final preparations

In major monetary and geopolitical shifts, exact dates are often the last thing disclosed.


No Rate Predictions — Only Proximity

Jeff’s Clear Disclaimer

“I’m not telling you when the rate is going to change.”

Key points he emphasizes:

  • He does not know the exact date

  • He believes the process is very close

  • He personally doubts it extends deep into January, but clarifies this is only opinion

This distinction is critical: proximity is not the same as prediction.


Featured Snippet

Why are officials avoiding dates in Iraq-related announcements?


During sensitive diplomatic and monetary transitions, governments often avoid specific dates to reduce speculation, maintain flexibility, and manage international coordination.


How This Fits Into the Broader Iraq Narrative

When viewed alongside other developments, Jeff’s observations align with a broader pattern:

✔ Increased diplomatic activity
✔ Vague but consistent messaging
✔ References to “stages” and transitions
✔ Avoidance of fixed timelines

Together, these elements suggest controlled movement rather than delay.


Important Context and Caution

  • No official exchange rate announcement has been made

  • Diplomatic travel does not guarantee immediate monetary action

  • Opinion should not be confused with confirmation

  • Monetary reform is typically managed quietly until completion

Jeff’s commentary encourages observation over expectation.


Q&A: Jeff Iraq Commentary Explained

Q: Is Iraq hiding information on purpose?

A: Possibly. Withholding dates during sensitive transitions is common in international policy.

Q: Does this confirm a rate change?

A: No. It suggests proximity, not confirmation.

Q: Why focus on diplomacy instead of economics?

A: Diplomatic alignment often precedes economic and monetary changes.

Q: Is January ruled out?

A: No. Jeff only shared a personal opinion, not a prediction.


Key Takeaways

  • Officials appear careful with timelines

  • Diplomatic language points to a transition phase

  • No confirmed dates or rates exist

  • Awareness and patience remain essential


Conclusion: Watch the Signals, Not the Dates

Jeff’s update is less about when something happens and more about how it is being handled. The deliberate avoidance of dates, combined with diplomatic movement and references to “the next stage,” suggests a process nearing completion—but still unfolding quietly.

For observers, the smartest approach is to track confirmed actions, not assumptions.


Follow DINAR EVALUATION for Ongoing Analysis

🌐 Official Blog
https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/

📢 Telegram
https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION

📘 Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064023274131

🐦 Twitter / X
https://x.com/DinaresGurus

▶️ YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/@DINARREVALUATION


 Hashtags

#JeffIraq
#IraqiDinar
#HiddenTimeline
#MonetaryReform
#IraqUpdate
#GlobalIntegration
#CurrencyTransition
#IQDNews
#DinarEvaluation

#EconomicSignals 

Jeff   

Are they hiding anything from us?  Absolutely...That's where I'm going to put my focus next.  I would recommend you do the same as well.  They give us a lot of details about Mark Savaya, Trumps envoy to Iraq...

They told us he would be going there after Christmas.  Then on Christmas Day, the 25th, they told us he would be going there in early 

January...Notice how they're going way out of their way to hide the date from us.  They also told us on Monday of last week that his efforts of going there would be the 'next stage'.  That means around when Iraq is going international.  Again, I want you to realize they're hiding the date from us.  That's no a coincidence...

I'm not telling you when the rate is going to change.  It is very close.  I don't know the date the rate is going to change...I don't think this will go into January but that's simply my opinion.

Thursday, February 5, 2026

🔥 JEFF UPDATE: IRAQ ELECTION CONFUSION, RATE CHANGE FIRST & WTO MEMBERSHIP TRUTH

🚨 MUST READ: WHY NOTHING MOVES IN IRAQ UNTIL THE RATE CHANGES

According to Jeff, one of the biggest problems right now is confusion — and misinformation surrounding Iraq’s political process.

Headlines and rumors are everywhere:

  • “Maliki is in”

  • “Maliki is out”

  • “Sudani is still running”

  • “Sudani is finished”

Jeff’s response is direct:

They’re not telling you the truth.

The situation is fluid, inconsistent, and unresolved — and that matters because nothing moves forward without a formed government and a rate change.


🗳️ ELECTION NOISE VS. REALITY

Jeff emphasizes that current election reporting is all over the board.

Key points:

  • Leadership claims change daily

  • No final decision has been locked

  • Political theater dominates headlines

His advice is simple:

Give it time and be patient.

Why? Because the exchange rate will not change until after the government is formed — and yet paradoxically, nothing progresses without the rate change either.


💱 THE RATE IS THE GATE

Jeff makes one of his strongest statements here:

Nothing in Iraq is moving forward until the government is formed and the rate is changed.

But he adds a crucial clarification:

The rate has to change before things can truly move forward.

This highlights a controlled sequencing:

  • Political formation

  • Rate change

  • Economic activation

Without the rate adjustment, reforms remain stalled on paper.


⚠️ THE MALIKI PROBLEM: WHY HE’S A DEAL-BREAKER

Jeff is clear about one scenario that could kill momentum:

  • If Nouri al-Maliki is brought forward

  • Jeff believes Trump would shut him down

  • Sanctions are seen as a very real possibility

Bottom line:

Jeff does not see the rate changing under a Maliki-led government.

This aligns with broader geopolitical pressure already discussed across other intel streams.


🌍 IRAQ & THE WTO: WHY MEMBERSHIP IS STILL ON HOLD

Question Asked:

“Do we know when Iraq will join the WTO?”

Jeff’s answer:

No — because it has never been officially announced.

However, there is important context.


🏛️ WHY IRAQ HAS BEEN STUCK AS A WTO OBSERVER SINCE 2004

Iraq has remained an observer member of the World Trade Organization since 2004.

Why?

Because several key requirements remain unfinished:

  • Laws

  • Taxes

  • Tariffs

  • Regulatory reforms

And here’s the critical point:

Some of these items cannot be finalized until the rate changes.


🔑 RATE CHANGE = WTO GREEN LIGHT

According to Jeff:

  • Iraq has been waiting on the rate to complete final steps

  • WTO accession requires economic consistency

  • Tariffs and taxes don’t work correctly under a distorted exchange rate

This explains why:

WTO membership has been “soon” for years — but never completed.

The rate is the missing piece.


📌 FEATURED SNIPPET: KEY TAKEAWAYS

Is Iraq’s election outcome settled?
No. Reporting is inconsistent and unresolved.

Will the IQD rate change before the government is formed?
Jeff believes the rate change is tied to government formation — but also necessary for progress.

Could Maliki block the rate change?
Yes. Jeff believes sanctions risk would halt momentum.

Why isn’t Iraq in the WTO yet?
Because key reforms, tariffs, and laws depend on a rate change.


❓ Q&A – QUICK CLARITY

Q: Is Iraq close to WTO membership?
A: Structurally yes — procedurally no, pending the rate change.

Q: Has WTO membership been announced?
A: No. Iraq remains an observer.

Q: Why does the rate matter so much?
A: It impacts tariffs, taxes, trade compliance, and reform credibility.

Q: Should we trust daily election rumors?
A: Jeff advises patience — not headlines.


🔔 BIG PICTURE: WHY JEFF’S VIEW MATTERS

✔ Political noise is masking real sequencing
✔ The rate change is foundational — not optional
✔ WTO accession depends on currency normalization
✔ Leadership choice directly affects timing

Jeff’s core message is clear:

The rate is the key that unlocks everything else.


🔗 Stay Connected for Ongoing IQD Intel

🌐 Official Blog:
👉 https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/

📢 Telegram:
👉 https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION

📘 Facebook:
👉 https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064023274131

🐦 X / Twitter:
👉 https://x.com/DinaresGurus

🎥 YouTube:
👉 
https://www.youtube.com/@DINARREVALUATION


🔥 Hashtags

#JeffUpdate
#IraqiDinar
#IQD
#IraqElections
#WTO
#CurrencyReform
#RateChange
#CBI
#GlobalTrade
#RVIntel


 Jeff 

 The overall elections right now...they're not telling you the truth...They're saying Maliki's in, Maliki's out, Sudani's still in running, Sudani's out. They're all over the board right now...We have to give it time and be patient...because the rate is not going to change till after the government is formed.

Nothing in Iraq is moving forward until the government is formed and the rate is changed.  The rate has to change before things will move forward.

 I don't see the rate changing if they brought Maliki forward because I think Trump would shut him down, probably put sanctions on him.

Question: "Do we know when Iraq joins the WTO?

 No...it's never been announced.  We know it's soon. There's still remaining pending items for Iraq to join the WTO...laws, taxes, tariffs.  There's a few small things waiting for the rate to change before Iraq can join the WTO...Iraq has remained an observing member all the way back since 2004 because they've been waiting for the rate to change so they can complete the steps we've talked about - reforms, tariffs, taxes and certain laws.

Tuesday, March 3, 2026

JEFF: 🔥 Middle East Tensions, Iraq Sanctions & The 4-Week Timeline

  🌍 A Critical Crossroads in the Middle East

Jeff recently outlined two possible directions for escalating tensions involving Iran, the United States, and the broader region.

According to Jeff, we are approaching a pivotal moment:

  1. A newly structured Iranian government could emerge and seek dialogue with Donald Trump
    OR

  2. The situation could escalate further, with continued military operations across the region.

At present, Jeff believes the second scenario appears more likely — at least in the short term.


⏳ The 4-Week Timeline: How Long Could This Last?

Recent reports suggest the Iran operation could last up to four weeks. Jeff, however, believes:

The timeline may be closer to two and a half to three weeks, rather than the full four.

President Trump has publicly stated that operations could take “four weeks or less,” indicating flexibility depending on developments on the ground.-

Featured Snippet:
Jeff estimates the Iran operation may last approximately 2.5 to 3 weeks, despite reports suggesting it could extend to four weeks.

If accurate, this would mean the situation could reach resolution sooner than many analysts expect.


🇮🇶 The Iraq Factor: U.S. Treasury & OFAC Sanctions

A major piece of Jeff’s analysis centers on Iraq and the role of the United States Department of the Treasury.

Specifically:

  • The U.S. Treasury currently maintains OFAC sanctions affecting Iraq.

  • Jeff emphasizes that the U.S. holds significant financial leverage over Iraq.

  • According to Jeff, the United States effectively controls major financial mechanisms within the country.

What Is OFAC?

The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) operates under the U.S. Treasury and administers economic and trade sanctions based on U.S. foreign policy and national security goals.

Featured Snippet:
The U.S. Treasury’s OFAC sanctions give Washington significant financial influence over Iraq’s banking and monetary systems.


🚫 Iranian Influence in Iraq: A Red Line

Jeff highlights a key statement from President Trump:

He will not tolerate or allow Iranian influence within Iraq.

This is a crucial policy position. Iraq sits at the intersection of:

  • Regional military strategy

  • Energy markets

  • Currency reform discussions

  • International financial oversight

Reducing or eliminating Iranian influence in Iraq could reshape the geopolitical and economic landscape of the region.


📊 Why This Matters Financially

In currency and revaluation discussions, regional stability is often viewed as a prerequisite for major monetary changes.

If the U.S. tightens control over Iraq’s financial system while limiting Iranian interference:

  • Banking reforms could accelerate

  • Sanctions policies could shift

  • International confidence in Iraq may strengthen

However, continued conflict could temporarily increase volatility.


🔎 Q&A Section

❓ How long will the Iran conflict last?

Jeff estimates approximately 2.5 to 3 weeks, though official statements indicate it could last up to four weeks or less.

❓ Does the U.S. control Iraq?

The U.S., through the Treasury and OFAC, maintains strong financial influence over Iraq, particularly through sanctions enforcement.

❓ Could this impact currency reform or the RV?

Geopolitical stability often plays a role in financial reform timelines, though no official announcement links current events to any revaluation.

❓ Is regime change in Iran possible?

Jeff suggests one potential outcome is a newly formed government seeking dialogue, though current developments suggest continued escalation.


🧭 Strategic Outlook

We are watching a rapidly evolving situation with two possible outcomes:

  • Diplomatic restructuring and stabilization

  • Continued military pressure and regional confrontation

Jeff believes the next few weeks will be decisive.

If the estimated 2.5–3 week timeline holds, we may see significant developments before the month concludes.


⚠️ Disclaimer

This analysis reflects Jeff’s personal opinions and interpretation of current events. It is not financial or investment advice. Always consult licensed professionals before making financial decisions.


🌎 Stay Updated Daily

📌 Blog: https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/
📲 Telegram: https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION
📘 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064023274131
🐦 Twitter (X): https://x.com/DinaresGurus
📺 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@DINARREVALUATION


🔥 Hashtags

#IranConflict #IraqNews #OFAC #USTreasury #MiddleEastUpdate #Geopolitics #TrumpPolicy #GlobalMarkets #RVWatch #BreakingAnalysis #EconomicSanctions #FinancialReset #StayInformed

Jeff 

  I talked about we're looking to see this go of two directions. 

 Possibly to where a newly created Iranian regime government is going to want to work with Trump and have dialogue or it's just going to go ugly sideways and Trump and the rest of the Middle East is going to keep blowing them up...That's the direction it's going right now...The news...said the Iran war could last up to 4 weeks. 

 I don't think that ... I'm thinking two and a half to three weeks...Trumps says the Iran  operation could take 4 weeks or less...

The US Treasury is the only country right now that has OFAC sanctions on Iraq.  We're in charge of Iraq.  We control them. Trump was very clear and said he will not tolerate or allow an Iranian influence within the country of Iraq...

DINAR REVALUATION INSIGHTS: 🛢️📊 Analysis: The Role of Iraq’s Sovereign Wealth Structure and Its Potential Impact on Dinar Stability

  🛢️📊 Analysis: The Role of Iraq’s Sovereign Wealth Structure and Its Potential Impact on Dinar Stability 🧭 1. Context: What the “Develop...