Iraq Considers Ending America-Led Coalition's Mission Amid Ongoing US Airstrikes, 11 FEB

Iraq Considers Ending America-Led Coalition's Mission Amid Ongoing US Airstrikes

A series of recent US airstrikes on Iran-backed armed groups in Iraq have exacerbated the already volatile situation in the region, sparking concerns of escalating instability and the potential for a larger cross-border conflict. Echoing these concerns, the military spokesman for Iraq's Prime Minister, Yahya Rasool, warned that the situation could draw Iraq into a broader confrontation.

US Airstrikes and the Escalating Tensions

These fears were heightened following a recent airstrike that reportedly claimed the life of a commander from Kataib Hezbollah, a group that the Pentagon accuses of orchestrating attacks on US forces. The US-led coalition, originally forged to combat the Islamic State, consists of 2,500 American troops tasked with advising and assisting in forestalling the resurgence of the militant group.

However, the onset of the conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza in October saw an escalation in hostilities in Iraq and Syria, with frequent retaliatory attacks between US forces and Iran-backed groups. This worrying trend has fueled an increasing number of questions about the future of the US-led coalition's presence in Iraq.

Stability at Stake

The US Central Command confirmed the strikes, stating that they were a response to attacks on American forces. Yet, this explanation did little to mollify Iraqi officials who labelled the drone strike as a 'blatant assassination,' warning that it threatens to destabilize Iraq.

Amidst this rising tension, the US State Department revealed that Iraq was not forewarned about the strikes. The Pentagon added that the US response to the killing of its service members is 'not complete,' thereby further complicating the process of reducing the US military footprint in Iraq and transitioning to a more conventional military-to-military relationship with Baghdad.

Retaliation and its Repercussions

In response to a drone attack that killed three American soldiers in Jordan, the US launched retaliatory strikes against Iranian proxies in Iraq and Syria. These strikes, which targeted command and control centers, headquarters buildings, and weapons storage facilities, have heightened concerns over regional stability.

Despite both the US and Iran claiming that they do not seek war, their continued retaliatory actions paint a different picture. The escalating tensions and the potential destabilization of Iraq due to these airstrikes and their aftermath remain a pressing concern for the international community.

https://bnnbreaking.com/conflict-defence/military/iraq-considers-ending-america-led-coalitions-mission-amid-ongoing-us-airstrikes

"USTB WILL BRING IN OUR LIQUIDITY THROUGH TOKENIZED ASSETS BACKED GOLD" BY GOLDILOCKS, 11 FEB

"QFS CONVERSATION WITH GOLDILOCKS"

"Only Qualified Purchasers, a designation granted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is typically reserved for entities with a net worth exceeding $5 million, will be eligible to acquire USTB."

Whales and institutional money are getting involved with tokenized assets especially the Bond Market. 

These US Treasury Bonds will support the infrastructure of the United States. The US Treasury is responsible for the production of our coins and currency. They facilitate the disbursement of payments to the American public. Involved in revenue collection such as taxes. And executes, when necessary, the borrowing of funds to run the Federal Government.

In other words, the underlying infrastructure of the United States of America is currently being interfaced into the new Digital Asset-Based Trading System. It will support the overall development and ongoing projects needed to give liquidity to many of our country's financial operating payment systems.

© Goldilocks

https://thedefiant.io/real-world-asset-firm-superstate-launches-first-fund-tokenizing-u-s-treasuries

Superstate Short Duration US Government Securities Fund (USTB) Token Tracker | Etherscan

https://etherscan.io/token/0x43415eb6ff9db7e26a15b704e7a3edce97d31c4e 

The US Treasury Bonds (USTB) will begin to bring in our liquidity through Tokenized Assets Backed by Gold. 

© Goldilocks

Iraqi Dinar🎉Redemption Center Showing Solid Rate IQD & VND $4 To $5-Ira...

Iraqi Government Raises Concerns Over U.S. Military Actions, 11 FEB

 Iraqi Government Raises Concerns Over U.S. Military Actions

Baghdad has raised alarm over the potential destabilizing fallout of recent American air strikes on Iraq's security landscape. Iraqi officials caution that such military actions risk the stability and sovereignty of the nation and may stoke heightened tensions or even direct confrontations. This development calls into question the future viability of the U.S. military's presence in Iraq, which many Iraqis view as an infringement on their country's autonomy.

Strained U.S.-Iraq Relations

The U.S. military has maintained a presence in Iraq for years, often citing the necessity of counter-terrorism efforts and supporting local forces to preserve peace and stability. However, the recent air strikes, targeting a senior commander from a pro-Iran armed group accused of attacking American troops, have strained relations. This incident has been met with widespread condemnation in Iraq, spawning threats of retaliation from pro-Iran factions and exacerbating the U.S.-Iran tension.

Questioning The U.S. Presence

The Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) and the 13th Brigade, both reportedly targeted in the U.S. air strikes, refute claims of involvement in attacks on American forces. They challenge the credibility of U.S. intelligence, emphasizing their own non-aggressive stance towards American troops. As the aftermath of the strikes unfolds, there is a growing concern over civilian casualties and a possible expansion of the U.S.'s definition of legitimate targets. The situation has intensified calls for an end to the U.S.'s partnership with Iraq.

A Delicate Balance

The current situation in Iraq underscores the intricate balance the U.S. must strike when conducting military operations abroad, particularly in nations with complex political dynamics and sensitivities towards foreign intervention. As various militia groups vow retaliation, and the U.S. reiterates its commitment to protect American troops in the region, the stakes are escalating. For Iraq, navigating these turbulent waters whilst preserving its sovereignty and maintaining its internal security remains a daunting challenge.

https://bnnbreaking.com/politics/iraqi-government-raises-concerns-over-us-military-actions

"GOLDILOCKS HIGHLIGHTS" , 11 FEB

 GOLDILOCKS HIGHLIGHTS

As we move into the month of February and March, look for large swings in the market as we approach the March 11th deadline. 

New tokenized assets will be coming on board to replace old traditional banking assets that used to stand on their own. 

These new assets will have commodities interfaced with them and giving them new values. Inflation will rear its ugly head during this transition, and it will begin to put price pressures on gold to calm the uncharted seas. 

The initial shock will be like sailing into a storm, but mechanisms are in place to absorb it as much as possible. 

We have shared enough information together leading up to this event and where it will take us to guide you during this difficult time. 

Just know, all of us will be in this together. 

© Goldilocks

http://www.investing.com/analysis/2-reasons-why-february-may-be-a-difficult-month-on-wall-street-200645728

IQD Cap Rate at $4.25💣Out of UN Chapter 7 = RV/RI?🤔Iraq Dinar RV Updates...

Russia hosts a meeting of BRICS Deputy Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, 11 FEB

Iraq's Journey Towards Sovereignty: Establishing a Timeline for Coalition Withdrawal

In a significant stride towards asserting full sovereignty, Iraq is set to convene a crucial meeting this Sunday, February 11, 2024. Major General Yahya Rasoul, the spokesperson for the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces in Iraq, announced that the Supreme Bilateral Military Technical Committee will reconvene to discuss and establish a timeline for the conclusion of the international coalition's mission in Iraq.

The committee, comprising representatives from both Iraq and the United States, will deliberate on the specific steps and dates for the withdrawal of coalition forces. This development is a noteworthy milestone in the ongoing dialogue between the two nations regarding the presence of international forces in Iraq.

The Path to the Present: A History of Military Cooperation

The international coalition, led by the United States, has been a significant presence in Iraq for many years. Formed to combat the Islamic State (ISIS), the coalition's mission has been fraught with challenges and controversies.

The escalating tensions between the US and Iran-backed militias in Iraq have further complicated the situation. The recent drone strike that killed two militia leaders sparked widespread outrage and led to calls for the withdrawal of US forces.

In response to these mounting pressures, the Iraqi parliament is planning to vote on a resolution mandating the expulsion of all foreign military forces from the country. This decision comes in the wake of continued US airstrikes targeting Iraqi security forces, which have been met with strong condemnation from various political factions and leaders in Iraq.

The Road Ahead: Navigating the Future of Military Presence

Against this backdrop, the upcoming meeting of the Supreme Bilateral Military Technical Committee assumes immense importance. The discussions are expected to provide clarity on the future of the US-led troop presence in Iraq.

"The meeting will mark a significant step towards Iraq's assertion of full sovereignty," said Major General Rasoul. "We are committed to working closely with our international partners to ensure a smooth and orderly transition."

The decision to set a timeline for the withdrawal of coalition forces is seen as a positive development by many. However, it also raises questions about the future of Iraq's security and stability.

"The international coalition has played a crucial role in combating ISIS and maintaining security in Iraq," said Dr. Hassan Al-Hakim, a political analyst based in Baghdad. "The challenge now is to ensure that the gains made so far are not lost in the transition."

A Delicate Balance: Asserting Sovereignty While Ensuring Security

As Iraq prepares to embark on this new chapter, it faces 

the daunting task of balancing its assertion of sovereignty

 with the need to ensure security and stability. The success

 of this endeavor will depend on the outcome of the upcoming meeting and the ability of all parties involved to navigate the complexities of the situation.

The world watches with bated breath as Iraq stands at the crossroads of history. The decisions made in the coming days will have far-reaching implications, not just for Iraq, but for the entire region.

As the curtain falls on this phase of military cooperation,

 a new chapter unfolds in Iraq's journey towards sovereignty. Only time will tell 

what this new chapter holds for the people of Iraq and the broader Middle East.

A New Chapter Unfolds: Iraq's Journey Towards Sovereignty

This Sunday, February 11, 2024, marks a significant milestone 

in Iraq's journey towards asserting full sovereignty. The 

Supreme Bilateral Military Technical Committee is set to 

reconvene to discuss and establish a timeline for the 

conclusion of the international coalition's mission in Iraq. 

This development is the culmination of ongoing dialogue 

between Iraq and the United States regarding the presence of

 international forces in Iraq.

The upcoming meeting will delve into the specific steps and

 dates for the withdrawal of coalition forces, marking the

 beginning of a new chapter in Iraq's history. As the nation

 prepares to embark on this journey, it faces the challenge 

of balancing its assertion of sovereignty with the need to

 ensure security and stability. The world watches with

 anticipation as Iraq stands at the threshold of a new era.

https://bnnbreaking.com/politics/iraqs-journey-towards-

sovereignty-establishing-a-timeline-for-coalition-withdrawal