Showing posts with label #IraqPolitics #IraqiDinar #Maliki #IraqGovernment #MiddleEastPolitics #Baghdad #PoliticalUpdate #GlobalEconomy #BreakingNews #DinarCommunity. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 4, 2026

In recent hours, the Iraqi capital, Baghdad, witnessed two important meetings between the US envoy to Iraq, Tom Barak , and outgoing Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani and Nouri al-Maliki, leader of the State of Law Coalition and candidate of the Coordination Framework for the next government.

The importance of the two meetings stems from the fact that they form the basis for determining the shape of the next government, the course of the political process, and the relationship between Baghdad and Washington, in light of the American rejection of al-Maliki’s nomination for the premiership and the latter’s insistence on adhering to this nomination, as the United States had previously threatened to impose sanctions on Iraq if al-Maliki assumed the position .

A statement from the Iraqi Prime Minister’s office said that “Barak conveyed to Al-Sudani the viewpoint of US President Donald Trump, his vision of the current situation in the region, and Iraq’s pivotal role in building stability and promoting regional development. “

The statement, which was received by Al-Sa’a Network, explained that “Al-Sudani indicated that the Iraqi leadership is committed to prioritizing the national interest and making efforts to protect the interests of the Iraqi people,” noting that “Iraq’s sovereignty and stability in various fields are not merely local considerations.”

The media office of Nouri al-Maliki, head of the State of Law Coalition, confirmed in a statement that he received the American envoy and that they discussed developments in the political scene in Iraq and upcoming national obligations .

During the meeting, according to a statement from his office, Maliki stressed “the need to respect Iraq’s sovereignty and the choices of its people,” pointing to “the importance of supporting the democratic process and strengthening political stability,” and noting “the importance of continued communication and coordination between the two sides on issues of common interest.”

The content of the two American messages to Maliki

However, political sources within the coordination framework revealed the content of the two meetings, in a manner that differs radically from the official statements issued by the offices of Al-Sudani and Al-Maliki. According to these sources, the American envoy informed Al-Sudani that Washington would impose sanctions if Al-Maliki were nominated for the prime minister.

The most important content came during the meeting between Barak and Maliki, where the American envoy handed Maliki two messages, one written and the other oral, stating that Maliki would not be the head of the next government in Iraq, otherwise American sanctions would be imposed on institutions, entities and individuals in Iraq .

Al-Sa’a Network obtained the contents of the two American messages addressed to Nouri al-Maliki and the coordination framework. The written message that Barak conveyed to al-Maliki from US President Donald Trump included the following :

” The United States recognizes and appreciates your experience, wisdom, and vision, which are of paramount importance not only to the political development in Iraq but also to the broader stability of the region. It is in this spirit that we seek constructive engagement, within the framework of specific considerations, to ensure the formation of the next Iraqi government.

Trump’s stance toward Maliki and the prime ministerial candidate is not based on personalities but on principle. Trump is focused on a new Middle East that turns the page on the past, one in which Iraq serves as an inspiration both domestically and internationally, and in which it strengthens its partnership with the United States. In this context, we must be direct and clear: the formation of the new government must reflect balance, inclusivity, and momentum toward the future. This requires your (Maliki’s) public and official withdrawal from the premiership. This step is essential for a viable political consensus and a move toward restoring international confidence at a pivotal moment in the future of Iraq and the region.

We believe your (Maliki’s) voice will be valuable in selecting the next prime ministerial candidate. However, we must also be clear: failure to cooperate in facilitating this transition and forming the government as Washington sees fit will have consequences, and the United States will impose sanctions.” Measures were taken against a number of Iraqi government institutions, as well as bodies, individuals and entities in Iraq .

As for the verbal message that Barak conveyed to Maliki, it included, according to informed political sources, that “Iraq has become completely subservient to Iran in recent years, and that the pro-Iranian militias in Iraq are the ones who control and lead the scene in Iraq, and that the United States spent billions of dollars on Iraq without gaining anything, and in return, Iran took control of it.

Therefore, we will give you (Maliki) the option and opportunity for you and your team to participate in choosing the next prime minister and to have a role in Iraqi political life in the next stage, and you can be officially invited to the United States, but all of this is after you officially and publicly withdraw from the nomination for the position of prime minister of the next government.”

Sources confirmed that the US sanctions could be announced in the middle of next week, and will include pro-Iran figures, then leaders in the coordination framework, and possibly Maliki , all if the latter does not give up his candidacy for the next government .

American messages combine persuasion and intimidation

Regarding the American messages to Maliki, Essam Al-Faily, a professor of political science at Al-Mustansiriya University, confirmed that the American message of rejection of Maliki assuming the premiership is clear through the leaks of what was said in the meeting that brought the latter together with the American envoy.

Al-Faily told Al-Sa’a Network: “The American message is clear and combines enticement and intimidation, as Washington confirmed that Maliki is an unwelcome figure in the position of Prime Minister, but at the same time the United States appreciates Maliki’s role and left him the important role in choosing the candidate for the premiership after he withdrew his candidacy and stipulated that his candidate be far from the Iranian axis . ”

He added that “the American message confirms that Washington does not want figures close to Iran, based on its vision for the region and the new Middle East, as it is working to limit Iranian influence in Iraq by preventing Maliki from assuming the premiership on the one hand, and preventing any other figure close to the Iranian axis from assuming this position . “

Al-Faily pointed out that “Washington is very frank and serious about dealing with the same way it dealt with Maliki, as it will take the same position with any figure close to Iran in Iraq, and this necessitates that Iraqi politicians understand this American vision in dealing with the Iraqi and Iranian file during the next stage.”

Former Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki expressed his rejection of what he described as blatant American interference in Iraq’s internal affairs, considering it a violation of the country’s sovereignty, in response to US President Donald Trump’s warning against Maliki’s return to the premiership.

This was preceded by the announcement of the Coordination Framework nominating Maliki for the premiership, in light of the results of the parliamentary elections in November 2025. However, Trump warned at the time that he would stop his country’s support for Iraq if Maliki assumed the position of Prime Minister.

Is there a time limit for the sanctions?

Regarding the existence of a time limit for imposing American sanctions on Iraq, researcher and political analyst Ayed Al-Hilali said, “In light of the meeting that took place today between Tom Barrack and Nouri Al-Maliki, questions are escalating in political circles about the nature of the messages that the meeting carried, and whether it reflects a decisive American position rejecting Al-Maliki’s nomination for the premiership, in addition to what is being rumored about the existence of a time limit ending on Monday to resolve this issue . ”

Al-Hilali added in a statement to Al-Sa’a Network: “The available data indicates that the meeting falls within the framework of normal diplomatic communication between Washington and the influential Iraqi political forces, especially in light of the political deadlock and internal complexities in which regional and international considerations are intertwined.”

He explained that the United States views the formation of the Iraqi government from the perspective of stability and ensuring that the country does not slide into new conflicts or sharp alignments that affect its strategic balances. Therefore, any messages conveyed during these meetings often relate to the specifications of the next stage and the form of the government, more than to an official declaration of rejection of a specific person.

Al-Hilali continued: “Regarding what is being circulated about a deadline ending on Monday, no official Iraqi body has yet announced a binding constitutional deadline at this time,” stressing that “the constitution does not stipulate a time limit for nominating a specific person outside the general frameworks for assigning the largest bloc, and therefore, talk of a deadline seems closer to political pressure or indirect messages aimed at accelerating understandings between the different forces, and not an official decision announced with a final date.”

Al-Hilali pointed out that “according to the political assessment, there may be American signals about the need to expedite the resolution to avoid further complications, but the final decision remains an internal Iraqi one, governed by the balance of power and understandings between the blocs. Therefore, the meeting and talk about the deadline reflect the level of sensitivity surrounding the stage, more than they indicate a decisive international decision that has been officially announced.”

🚨 MNT GOAT:🇮🇶💥 Iraq is Loaded & Ready! Mnt Goat Reveals Al-Sudani’s Bold Comeback 💰🔥

TRUMP: I GET ALONG WELL WITH IRAQI LEADERS

US President Donald Trump said on Friday that he gets on very well with Iraqi leaders.

In Baghdad, US envoy Tom Barrack held a series of meetings with senior officials to resolve the political deadlock in the country. Trump said, “I get along very well with the Iraqi leadership,” indicating that there is good understanding and coordination between the two sides.

A source within the coordination framework revealed an American warning related to Iraqi political entitlements. The source stated that the American envoy, Tom Barrack, informed the Iraqi Prime Minister that Washington might impose sanctions if Nouri al-Maliki were nominated for a high political position.

The source indicated that the potential US sanctions on Iraq may be announced in the middle of next week, and will initially target figures loyal to Iran, before later including leaders in the coordination framework.

Al-Ahd TV, the mouthpiece of Asaib Ahl al-Haq, which opposes Maliki’s nomination for prime minister, quoted a source as saying: “Barak informed Maliki that America does not object to him assuming any position other than the prime minister.”

FRANK26……..MALIKI GONE 💯

THE SHIITE FRAMEWORK DECIDES TO WITHDRAW AL-MALIKI’S CANDIDACY – ARAB MEDIA

A stormy meeting in Baghdad ends with a preliminary agreement within the Shiite framework to exclude Maliki from the race.

A leader in the Arab Television Coordination Framework reported on Tuesday (March 3, 2026) that the members of the framework reached a preliminary agreement in their meeting today to withdraw the nomination of Nouri al-Maliki for the presidency of the next Iraqi government and to choose an alternative to be determined later.

A senior official source told Network 964 that a stormy meeting of the Shiite framework ended this afternoon at the palace of Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, and

the prime ministerial candidate Nouri al-Maliki decided to boycott it, citing that he was fasting and a little exhausted, but he stressed his refusal to issue any statement withdrawing his candidacy after the objections that accompanied the putting forward of his name and the international and regional circumstances. According to the report, al-Maliki repeated his suggestion that the members of the framework issue a statement announcing the withdrawal of al-Maliki’s candidacy, and he said that he would not object to that “because the decision is the decision of the largest bloc and he will not oppose it.”

The meeting comes hours after the head of the Supreme Judicial Council published an article that sparked significant reactions, in which he spoke about the Federal Court amending its interpretation of the largest bloc and granting the right to form the government to the first winner in the elections, which could mean a return of the opportunity for the current Prime Minister, Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, whose coalition won the largest number of seats.

MNT GOAT: 🚨Shiite Framework Reportedly Moves to Withdraw Maliki’s Candidacy

A significant political development may be unfolding in Iraq as reports indicate that the Shiite Coordination Framework has reached a preliminary agreement to withdraw the candidacy of Nouri al-Maliki for the leadership of the next Iraqi government.

According to sources cited by regional media, the decision could represent a crucial step toward ending the ongoing political deadlock that has delayed the formation of Iraq’s new government.

This development has drawn considerable attention from political observers and members of the global dinar community who are closely monitoring the situation.

The Meeting That Could End Iraq’s Political Deadlock

According to reports from Network 964 and other regional outlets, a key meeting took place at the residence of Mohammed Shia' Al Sudani in Baghdad.

The purpose of the meeting was to address several urgent issues, including:

Read also: 🔥 MarkZ [via PDK]: Same Exchange Rates at All Banks? Bonds Silent as Middle East Reach
The unresolved presidency of Iraq
The formation of a new prime ministerial government
Constitutional deadlines that have already passed
The growing political stalemate affecting the country

Sources described the meeting as “stormy,” reflecting the intense debate among members of the Shiite political bloc.

Preliminary Agreement to Remove Maliki from the Race

Following the meeting, a leader within the Shiite Coordination Framework reportedly confirmed that a preliminary agreement had been reached.

The agreement includes:

Withdrawing the nomination of Nouri al-Maliki
Selecting an alternative candidate for the next government
Attempting to break the ongoing political deadlock

If finalized, the decision could significantly reshape Iraq’s political landscape.

Why Maliki’s Withdrawal Matters

The candidacy of Nouri al-Maliki has been one of the most controversial elements in Iraq’s political negotiations.

Maliki previously served as Prime Minister of Iraq from 2006 to 2014, a period marked by major political and security challenges.

His potential return to power has generated strong reactions among different political factions within Iraq.

Removing him from the race could:

Reduce tensions between competing political blocs
Open the door for a compromise candidate
Accelerate the formation of a new government

Political analysts believe this step may help unlock stalled negotiations.

The Role of the Shiite Coordination Framework

The Shiite Coordination Framework is one of the most influential political alliances in Iraq.

The coalition represents several major Shiite political parties and plays a critical role in determining the leadership of Iraq’s government.

Its decisions often influence:

Prime minister nominations
Parliamentary alliances
National policy direction

Because of its influence, any shift in the framework’s position can quickly alter the political balance in Baghdad.

Iraq’s Political Deadlock Explained

Iraq has been facing a prolonged government formation crisis due to competing political interests.

Key issues include:

Disagreements among political blocs
Delays in appointing top leadership positions
Missed constitutional deadlines for forming a government

These delays have created uncertainty both politically and economically.

Observers note that resolving this deadlock is essential for Iraq to move forward with broader reforms.

What This Could Mean for Iraq’s Stability

If the agreement to withdraw Maliki’s candidacy becomes official, it could lead to several developments:

A new prime ministerial candidate may emerge.
Political negotiations could accelerate.
Parliament could move forward with stalled decisions.

Many observers believe that political stability is a key requirement for economic progress in Iraq.

Featured Snippet: Why Is Iraq’s Government Formation Delayed?

Iraq’s government formation has been delayed due to disagreements among major political blocs, particularly over the nomination of the prime minister. The withdrawal of controversial candidates like Nouri al-Maliki could help resolve the political deadlock and allow a new government to form.

Q&A: Iraq Political Developments

Who is Nouri al-Maliki?

Nouri al-Maliki is a former Prime Minister of Iraq who served from 2006 to 2014 and remains a major political figure within the Shiite political coalition.

What is the Shiite Coordination Framework?

The Shiite Coordination Framework is a coalition of political parties that represents a powerful bloc within Iraq’s parliament and plays a key role in government formation.

Why is Iraq experiencing political deadlock?

Political factions have been unable to agree on leadership positions, including the presidency and prime ministership, leading to delays in forming a new government.

Could this decision change Iraq’s political future?

Yes. Removing a divisive candidate may allow competing political factions to reach compromise and finalize the next government.

Key Takeaways

The reported decision within the Shiite Coordination Framework could mark an important turning point in Iraq’s political process.

Major points include:

A key meeting held in Baghdad to address leadership disputes
A preliminary agreement to withdraw Nouri al-Maliki’s candidacy
Efforts to end Iraq’s political deadlock
Plans to select a new candidate for the next government

If confirmed, this development could help move Iraq closer to political stability.

Follow the Latest Iraq & Dinar Updates

📊 BLOG:
https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/

📢 TELEGRAM:
https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION

👍 FACEBOOK:
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064023274131

🐦 TWITTER / X:
https://x.com/DinaresGurus

🎥 YOUTUBE:
https://www.youtube.com/@DINARREVALUATION

Hashtags

#IraqPolitics
#IraqiDinar
#Maliki
#IraqGovernment
#MiddleEastPolitics
#Baghdad
#PoliticalUpdate
#GlobalEconomy
#BreakingNews

#DinarCommunity

MNT GOAT

THE DEADLOCK ENDS "THE SHIITE FRAMEWORK DECIDES TO WITHDRAW AL-MALIKI'S CANDIDACY - ARAB MEDIA."

A source confirmed to Network 964 that a meeting, which was to be held at the home of Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, discussed resolving the issues of the presidency and the prime minister, especially after exceeding the constitutional deadlines and the country entering a

phase of political deadlock. "A stormy meeting in Baghdad ends with a preliminary agreement within the Shiite framework to exclude Maliki from the race. A leader in the Arab Television Coordination Framework reported on Tuesday (March 3, 2026) that the members of the framework reached a preliminary agreement in their meeting today to withdraw the nomination of Nouri al-Maliki for the presidency of the next Iraqi government and to choose an alternative to be determined later.

DINAR REVALUATION

Pages