Tuesday, January 27, 2026
BREAKING | SOURCES TO IRAQ OBSERVER: TRUMP’S ENVOY TO IRAQ, SAVAYA, HAS ALREADY ARRIVED IN BAGHDAD AND MET WITH AL-SUDANI AT A WORKING DINNER
BREAKING | SOURCES TO IRAQ OBSERVER: TRUMP’S ENVOY TO IRAQ, SAVAYA, HAS ALREADY ARRIVED IN BAGHDAD AND MET WITH AL-SUDANI AT A WORKING DINNER.
According to multiple sources, US President Donald Trump’s envoy to Iraq, Mark Savaya, has already arrived in Baghdad.
These sources, speaking to Iraq Observer, said Savaya met with Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani for a working dinner on Thursday evening. The anticipated visit of the US envoy was preceded by a series of statements he made through a number of tweets on his official X account, focusing on combating the rampant corruption in the Iraqi state and drying up its sources.
In the past few days, Savaya has also posted a series of photos of his meetings with US President Trump, the Secretaries of War and the Treasury, and other US officials, along with comments about his intention to address a number of crises facing Iraq.
No official statement has yet been issued by the Iraqi government regarding the start of the visit and its agenda.
MNT GOAT: Waiting on the Prophets — What God’s Timing May Reveal About Iraq and the Dinar
Featured Snippet
Have biblical prophecies mentioned the Iraqi dinar?
Yes. Prophet Kim Clement spoke on multiple occasions about major change coming to the Iraqi dinar and the Middle East. Many believe current geopolitical events suggest those prophecies are nearing fulfillment.
Introduction: Waiting for God to Speak Again
I am waiting — patiently — for God to speak again about Iraq through His prophets.
We already know that Prophet Kim Clement spoke twice about the Iraqi dinar and dramatic change in the Middle East. The question many are now asking is simple:
👉 Will God release another prophetic word soon?
As we enter a new year filled with uncertainty, this question carries more weight than ever.
A New Year: A Year of Breakthrough?
Many prophetic voices are calling this a year of breakthrough.
Not in one area — but in many:
Exposure of corruption
Political realignment
Economic transformation
Spiritual awakening
What’s interesting is this:
👉 Old prophecies are being repeated again and again.
In prophetic understanding, repetition often signals imminent fulfillment.
Why Past Prophecies Matter Now
Some dismiss prophecy as outdated or symbolic.
But history shows us something different:
Prophecies often precede major upheaval
Fulfillment rarely looks the way people expect
Timing is everything
Kim Clement specifically spoke of:
The Iraqi dinar
Massive change in the Middle East
Shifts that would shock the world
Look around.
Can you also see it now — especially as Iran’s regime weakens?
God Uses Prophets in Times of Trouble
Scripture shows us that God speaks most clearly in times of crisis.
And if anyone believes:
Nations are not in trouble
The world is stable
Corruption is under control
Then they are not paying attention.
This is a season of:
Exposure
Accountability
Justice
Discernment Is More Important Than Ever
Here is where caution matters.
Not every voice claiming prophecy is genuine.
We must learn to:
Discern truth from deception
Separate authentic guidance from manipulation
Ignore sensationalism
We have already seen the damage caused by false claims and empty promises, especially in the IQD and RV space.
Discernment protects faith.
Why Prayer Still Matters
Prayer is not passive.
Prayer is:
Alignment
Affirmation
Gratitude
When we pray, we are saying:
“Thank You, God — and please continue.”
Prayer anchors hope.
Prophecy provides direction.
Together, they give peace.
Hope, Comfort, and Focus on Truth
True prophetic words are not meant to create fear.
They are meant to:
Encourage
Refocus
Strengthen faith
I share only what I believe are credible prophetic voices, not to persuade — but to encourage clarity and grounding in truth.
A Prayer for the Year Ahead
We pray:
🙏 Let this be a year of exposure of corruption
🙏 Let it bring accountability for those responsible
🙏 Let justice triumph, as God has promised
🙏 Let it bring a truly sovereign Iraq, United States, and all nations that value freedom
🙏 Let it usher in the Great Wealth Transfer, with happiness, abundance, and prosperity
How This Connects to Iraq and the Dinar
A stable Iraq does not come from:
Corruption
Foreign control
Manipulated leadership
It comes from:
Sovereignty
Accountability
Truth
Prophetic insight does not replace facts — it illuminates timing.
Q&A: Common Questions
Did Kim Clement really mention the Iraqi dinar?
Yes. He referenced major changes involving the dinar and the Middle East on more than one occasion.
Does prophecy guarantee timing?
No. Prophecy reveals direction, not deadlines.
Why are old prophecies resurfacing now?
Repetition often signals closeness to fulfillment.
Should prophecy replace research and facts?
No. It should complement discernment, not replace it.
Is this a year of breakthrough?
Many believe so — spiritually, politically, and economically.
Final Thoughts
We wait — not in fear, but in awareness.
We watch — not headlines alone, but patterns.
We pray — not for speed, but for alignment.
Because when God moves, it is never random.
Stay Connected & Informed
🔗 Blog: https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/
📢 Telegram: https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION
📘 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064023274131
🐦 Twitter/X: https://x.com/DinaresGurus
📺 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@DINARREVALUATION
Hashtags
#MNTGOAT #Prophecy #IraqiDinar
#KimClement #FaithAndFinance
#WealthTransfer #SpiritualAwakening
#IraqChange #GlobalShift
#TruthAndDiscernment
MNT GOAT
I am waiting for God to speak up about Iraq again through His prophets. We know that prophet Kim Clement already prophesized on two different occasions about the Iraqi dinar. Will God give us another one soon? We wait.
What will this new year bring?
More than ever, we need to tune into the prophets during this new year! This is said to be the great year of the breakthrough in many aspects. Many of these past prophecies have yet to be fulfilled. They are now being repeated time and time again in prophetic word. What does this mean. I am told this means they are very close to fulfillment. Let’s see what the new year brings. Remember God’s prophet Kim Clement told us the Iraqi dinar and the middle east would change drastically. Can you see it now when Iran falls?
God uses his prophets in time of trouble. If you don’t think this nation and the world is in trouble – THINK AGAIN! If you can discern the fake from the good prophets, you can tie into something wonderful to guide you. But be careful there are many charlatans out there and we have witnessed these many bastards already in the IQD RV intel standpoint. Prayer also helps as it lets God know you are affirming as a human being what he is doing. You are essentially saying THANK YOU and please continue! These prophecies give us hope and comfort to know some higher power is looking after us. I have tried to bring you what I believe are some of the legitimate prophets for clarity. I hope they are giving you encouragement to stay focused on the TRUTH.
We pray-
- Let it be a year of more EXPOSURE of corruption and just as important, ACCOUNTABLITY for those involved. God says JUSTICE will triumph.
- Let it bring a truly sovereign Iraq, United States and all other nations who embrace freedom, liberty and justice.
- Let it bring the great Wealth Transfer, with Happiness, Abundance and Prosperity.
______________________________
________________________________________
Their words not mine….
SAVAYA MET WITH THE FRAMEWORK LEADERS AND DELIVERED TRUMP’S MESSAGE TO THEM
SAVAYA MET WITH THE FRAMEWORK LEADERS AND DELIVERED TRUMP’S MESSAGE TO THEM.
On Monday, Amer Al-Fayez, a leader in the Coordination Framework and head of the Tasmeem bloc, revealed that Trump’s envoy, Mark Savaya, met with the framework’s leaders individually, noting that he delivered clear messages to them rejecting the Trump administration’s refusal to grant any high-ranking position in the government and parliament to figures affiliated with one of the Iraqi factions.
PARLIAMENT DENIES POSTPONING THE SESSION TO ELECT THE PRESIDENT.
The House of Representatives denied postponing Tuesday’s session dedicated to electing the President of the Republic. The media office of the House of Representatives stated in a statement that “Tuesday’s session to elect the President of the Republic is scheduled to take place as planned, and the news circulating about its postponement is false.”
The source told Shafaq News Agency that “the coordination framework held an important meeting on Monday, at the headquarters of the National Approach Party, to discuss the issue of the presidency and to deliberate on the available options, in preparation for reaching a final unified decision on who will be nominated to fill this position.”
(The constitutional deadline expires this week to seat the president)
MNT GOAT: U.S. Draws a Red Line — No Iranian Militias, No Dollar Support, No Reinstatement
Featured Snippet
Why is the U.S. threatening Iraq over Iranian militias?
The U.S. has made clear that Iraqi sovereignty means excluding Iran-backed militias from government. Continued militia influence risks sanctions, loss of dollar access, and delays to economic normalization.
Introduction: Sovereignty Comes With Responsibility
“The United States supports Iraqi sovereignty… That leaves absolutely no role for Iran-backed militias.”
That statement alone tells you everything you need to know.
Sovereignty does not mean serving Tehran.
Sovereignty means serving the Iraqi people.
And all of this pressure is intensifying as Iran’s own regime shows signs of cracking internally. This is maximum pressure — financial, political, and strategic — coming from every direction.
Financial Times Confirms Escalation: Dollar Supply at Risk
In the article titled:
“FINANCIAL TIMES: WASHINGTON THREATENED TO CUT OFF DOLLAR SUPPLIES TO IRAQ IF BAGHDAD REFUSED TO REPLACE ADNAN FAIHAN”
we learn that Washington is now directly pressuring senior Iraqi politicians to form a government free of armed factions.
One name stands out.
Why Adnan Faihan Is a Deal Breaker
Adnan Faihan:
Former member of Asaib Ahl al-Haq
Group designated by the Trump administration as a terrorist organization
Recently elected first deputy speaker of parliament
According to the report:
“Tensions have escalated with Washington following the election of Adnan Faihan.”
And the U.S. response?
“The U.S. embassy was furious… calling it hostile behavior and an act of defiance.”
The demand was unmistakable:
➡️
Replace him.
Read the Signals: The U.S. Is Not Backing Down
How many articles does it take to understand the message?
No Iranian-backed militias
No armed factions in government
No symbolic compliance
No delays
This is not negotiation.
This is enforcement.
Whether it takes months or weeks depends entirely on what Iraq chooses to do next.
Why Iran Needs Iraq as a Puppet State
Iran’s position is simple:
Iraq is a financial lifeline
Iraqi banks have been used to bypass sanctions
Dollar access keeps Iran afloat
U.S. and Iraqi officials have confirmed that Iran has long exploited Baghdad’s banking system.
That is exactly why Washington has:
Sanctioned over a dozen Iraqi banks
Tightened dollar compliance
Increased monitoring
And now the pressure escalates.
The Nuclear Option: Oil Dollars
So far, the U.S. has not fully cut off Iraq’s oil dollar flows.
But make no mistake:
Over $100 billion in Iraqi oil revenues remain under U.S. control
Funds are routed through the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Oil is still sold in U.S. dollars
Ask yourself:
What happens if that flow stops?
How does Iraq pay salaries?
How does it fund its budget?
How does it survive?
Trump’s Envoy Arrives in Baghdad
In the article titled:
“BREAKING | SOURCES TO IRAQ OBSERVER: TRUMP’S ENVOY TO IRAQ, SAVAYA, HAS ALREADY ARRIVED IN BAGHDAD”
we learn that Mark Savaya, President Trump’s envoy, met with Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani for a working dinner.
Sources say discussions focused on:
Rampant corruption
Drying up illicit funding sources
Structural reform
No official statement yet — but silence here is meaningful.
Washington’s Demand: Disarm the Militias — Now
Another article revealed even more urgency:
“WASHINGTON THREATENS BAGHDAD WITH THE ‘NUCLEAR OPTION’: REPLACE FAIHAN AND DISARM THE FACTIONS IMMEDIATELY”
Key takeaway:
Iraqi factions proposed a two-year phased disarmament
Washington rejected it outright
Immediate action demanded
Why?
Because history matters.
Why the U.S. Won’t Be Fooled Again
We’ve seen this movie before.
Nouri al-Maliki:
Promised reform
Delivered corruption
Blocked reinstatement in 2013
Purged the Central Bank leadership
Refused to leave office
Exploited ISIS as a power play
This is documented history — not speculation.
Washington knows it.
Positive News: Iraq Has No Budget Deficit
Let’s shift to something constructive.
In the article:
“BAGHDAD TODAY INVESTIGATES: IRAQ’S BUDGET HAS NO DEFICIT”
we learn what many already suspected:
➡️ Iraq does not lack revenue.
➡️ It lacks collection and discipline.
The money exists.
It’s just being stolen or mismanaged.
The Hoarding Crisis: A Banking Failure
Another article reveals why liquidity is scarce:
87% of cash (about 95 trillion dinars) sits outside the banking system.
Why?
Banks alter contracts unilaterally
Depositors receive lower returns than promised
Trust collapses
Economic expert Salam al-Zubaidi warned:
“These practices discourage deposits and worsen the liquidity crisis.”
This creates:
Hoarding
Weak lending
Slowed growth
Yes — more banking reform is needed.
What This All Means
This election cycle is not just messy.
It is decisive.
The coming weeks could:
Move Iraq forward rapidly
Or delay normalization for years
There is no middle ground.
Q&A: Key Questions Answered
Will the U.S. tolerate Iranian militias in government?
No. The position is explicit and firm.
Is dollar access really at risk?
Yes. Dollar flows are the U.S.’s strongest leverage.
Does Iraq have a budget deficit?
No. The issue is corruption and mismanagement.
Why is banking reform critical?
Without trust, cash stays outside banks, crippling liquidity.
Could this delay reinstatement?
Absolutely, if instability and Iranian influence continue.
Final Thoughts
This drama is far from over.
But now the lines are drawn.
The pressure is real.
And the consequences are clear.
Iraq must choose:
Reform or regression
Sovereignty or subservience
Stability or sanctions
The next few weeks will tell us everything.
Stay Connected & Informed
🔗 Blog: https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/
📢 Telegram: https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION
📘 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064023274131
🐦 Twitter/X: https://x.com/DinaresGurus
📺 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@DINARREVALUATION
Hashtags
#MNTGOAT #IraqPolitics #USPressure #IranMilitias
#IraqRV #DinarReinstatement #OilDollars
#MiddleEastGeopolitics #BankingReform
#EconomicSovereignty #IraqElections
MNT GOAT
“The United States supports Iraqi sovereignty, and the sovereignty of every country in the region. That leaves absolutely no role for Iran-backed militias that pursue malign interests, cause sectarian division, and spread terrorism across the region,” With sovereignty means responsibility to serve the Iraqi people not the Iranian regime which desperately now needs Iraqi support. Remember too that all of this come on the heels of what is now going on in Iran as the current regime is about to break. This is maximum pressure from the US from all directions.
In the article titled “FINANCIAL TIMES: WASHINGTON THREATENED TO CUT OFF DOLLAR SUPPLIES TO IRAQ IF BAGHDAD REFUSED TO REPLACE ADNAN FAIHAN” we learn at the Financial Times reported on Friday that Washington is pressuring senior Iraqi politicians to form a government that is free from armed factions. There is one person especially they want out. His name is Adnan Faihan. He is a former member of the Asaib Ahl al-Haq, which has been designated by the Trump administration as a terrorist organization. Go figure?
I quote from the article – “tensions have escalated with Washington following the election of Adnan Faihan, a former member of Asaib Ahl al-Haq, as first deputy speaker of parliament last month.” According to the news, “The US embassy was furious and said this was hostile behavior and an act of defiance, and they demanded his replacement.” Can everyone see now where this is going and what it is going to lead to? How many more articles do we need to see to understand the US is NOT going to back down on elimination of these Iranian-backed militia members and politicians in the Iraqi government. It may be months before this government is formed correctly or it may happen sooner that we think depending on what Iraq decides to do.
Why does Iran need Iraq as its “puppet” state?
Iran’s stance is that it views Iraq as vital for keeping its economy afloat amid sanctions and long used Baghdad’s banking system to skirt the restrictions, US and Iraqi officials have said. Successive US administrations have sought to choke that dollar stream, placing sanctions on more than a dozen Iraqi banks in recent years in an effort to do so. But there is about to be sanctions like Iraq has never experienced before if they do not bend to these Iranian backed politicians. Washington has never yet curtailed the flow of dollars from the oil revenues of Iraq, sent via the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to the Central Bank of Iraq. As you might recall the US has had de facto control over Iraq’s oil revenue since it invaded the country in 2003.
So, all my readers should realize after learning of the complete news, not just one sided, that the drama of this election is far from over. These are pivotal weeks ahead. These coming weeks could either move our investment in the correct direction of sooner than later or it could push it to much, much later, like years away. I just have to be honest with everyone from the news we are getting from Iraq.
___________________________
What else do we know…..
In a recent article titled “BREAKING | SOURCES TO IRAQ OBSERVER: TRUMP’S ENVOY TO IRAQ, SAVAYA, HAS ALREADY ARRIVED IN BAGHDAD AND MET WITH AL-SUDANI AT A WORKING DINNER” we learned that the US President Donald Trump’s envoy to Iraq, Mark Savaya, has already arrived in Baghdad and met with Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani for a working dinner on last Thursday evening. What do you think they mainly talked about? Conversation from sources told us it focused on combating the rampant corruption in the Iraqi state and drying up its sources. No official statement has yet been issued by the Iraqi government regarding the start of the visit and its agenda. I will try to give you today yet more of what I have learned so far since last Thursday.
Please take a peek at the article titled “WASHINGTON THREATENS BAGHDAD WITH THE “NUCLEAR OPTION” (in a matter of speaking): REPLACE FAYHAN AND DISARM THE FACTIONS IMMEDIATELY”. In it we learned that an Iraqi newspaper quoted informed sources stating that American officials, during their meeting with prominent Iraqi political leaders tasked with forming the next government in recent weeks, pushed for the presentation of a credible plan to disarm Iranian-backed armed groups quickly.
The news also quoted a source as saying that the coordinating framework, including the main militias backed by Tehran, offered to announce a phased disarmament plan over two years after the formation of the government, hoping that the issue would “lose momentum” before its implementation. However, the report said that Washington demanded immediate action not years away. We know that these Iranian-backed politicians will say one thing and do another. Nori al-Maliki’s last administration was full of saying what you wanted to hear and then he did what he wanted later. So, will the US be fooled again with their lies? Remember it was the US that had bad intelligence on Nori al-Maliki and supported his election at the second prime minister of Iraq in disregard to the election results and the winning political block to select the next prime minister. Remember Dr Ayad Allawi? He was interim prime minister of Iraq from 2004 to 2005 and then ran for the prime minister against Maliki in the 2006 election cycle. Allawi won the majority of votes and was selected by the majority political block as their nominee; however, the sleaze-bag Nori al-Maliki was seeded instead due to a technicality. This is when all the trouble began with Iraq right from this moment on and the corruption began. As we can prove he also blocked the reinstatement of 2013 with false accusations of Central Bank corruption. This is also when Dr Siani Shabibi was ousted as head of the CBI. Maliki served two terms and ended in 2014 as the prime minister. He had to be forcefully taken out of office as he refused to concede his office. He wanted another dictatorship and to be the next Saddam Hussien. He tried to use the ISIS invasion as his fear factor to do so. He is an opportunist and will step on anybody, kill anybody to gain control of Iraq again.
________________________________
Lastly let’s look at more positive news for today in the article titled “BAGHDAD TODAY INVESTIGATES: IRAQ’S BUDGET HAS NO DEFICIT… REVEALING THE “FIGURES” THAT CITIZENS ARE NOT MEANT TO SEE – URGENT” I have said previously that Iraq has no deficit only stolen money. This article takes a hard look at the revenue streams. Why do some politicians keep looking at deficits and the glass is half empty when we can clearly see that there is more than enough revenues only they need to align good sound practices to collect these revenues and put them into the Federal coffers, thus not steal the funds.
But, in this regard, we must also take a hard look at the US and all the stolen money exposed by DOGE and since. Even with measures in place in the US the money flows into notorious hands if not audited and carefully managed. Iraq, as new as it is, is even more susceptible to these dangers of stolen money. But this will change as it is changing also in the US.
In another article they expose yet another reason why these hoards of cash are not in the banks that the CBI keeps telling us about in many articles of the past. It is titled “AN ECONOMIST SAYS BANKS’ MANIPULATION OF PROFITS IS EXACERBATING THE “HOARDING CRISIS” AND LIQUIDITY SHORTAGE.” Oh… so it this issue much more complicated than most believe? These practices we learn about today have led to a loss of confidence in the public banking sector, encouraging citizens to hoard their money at home and in businesses, away from the formal banking system
In the article we learn that economic expert Salam al-Zubaidi warned on Thursday of the repercussions of some state-owned banks altering the terms of agreements with depositors. I quote –“He emphasized that this ill-considered measure has resulted in reduced profits for citizens and discouraged them from depositing funds, exacerbating the phenomenon of hoarding and the country’s liquidity crisis.”
I quote from the article again – “There are numerous complaints from citizens regarding the reduced profits they receive when depositing their money, which contradicts the initial terms of the agreement with the bank.” and that “the main problem lies in the ill-conceived management decisions that unilaterally change previous contracts.”
I quote “these practices have led to a loss of confidence in the public banking sector, encouraging citizens to hoard their money at home and in businesses, away from the formal banking system.” He pointed out that this “hoarding” poses a significant challenge to the Iraqi economy, as approximately 87% of the circulating cash (around 95 trillion dinars) remains outside the formal banking system. This phenomenon of hoarding money has caused a major liquidity crisis and negatively impacted banks’ ability to finance and lend, thus harming overall economic growth in the country.” Looks like yet another banking reform is needed….. will it ever end?
IRAQ FACES ITS TOUGHEST TEST YET: US THREATS TO CUT OFF OIL REVENUES PLUNGE THE COUNTRY INTO A COMPLEX CRISIS
IRAQ FACES ITS TOUGHEST TEST YET: US THREATS TO CUT OFF OIL REVENUES PLUNGE THE COUNTRY INTO A COMPLEX CRISIS.
Abbas al-Jubouri, head of the Al-Rafid Center for Political and Strategic Studies, warned on Sunday (January 25, 2026) of serious repercussions that the Iraqi state may face if political forces proceed with including armed factions in the next government formation, in light of clear American threats to cut off or restrict the revenues of Iraqi oil sales deposited in the United States.
Al-Jubouri told Baghdad Today that “activating this threat is not just a symbolic or political measure, but rather a very dangerous economic pressure tool, given that Iraq relies primarily on the American financial system to pass its oil revenues, which makes the national economy vulnerable to severe shocks that may affect salaries, service projects, cash reserves, as well as the stability of the dinar exchange rate.”
MNT GOAT: Another Major Obstacle for Maliki — Parliament, U.S. Pressure, and the Iranian Militia Factor
Featured Snippet
Can parliament block Nouri al-Maliki from becoming prime minister?
Yes. Beyond political nominations, Iraq’s parliament must ratify the prime minister. Deep divisions, veto threats, Kurdish opposition, and U.S. sanctions pressure over Iranian militias make a third Maliki term highly unstable and unlikely.
Introduction: The Circus Isn’t Over Yet
Just remember:
👉 The circus is not over until the fat lady sings.
Despite headlines suggesting inevitability, there are multiple layers of resistance building against Nouri al-Maliki becoming Iraq’s next prime minister — and many observers are overlooking one critical factor:
Parliament still has to ratify the nominee.
And that may be where this entire plan collapses.
The Overlooked Element: Parliament’s Power to Veto
Many focus on nominations and political blocs, but the Iraqi constitution is clear:
➡️ Parliament must approve the prime minister.
In the article titled:
“SHARP DISAGREEMENTS WITHIN THE HALBOUSI COALITION OVER THE VETO OF A THIRD TERM FOR MALIKI”
we learn that Maliki’s path faces serious resistance even inside alliances previously considered supportive.
Deep Divisions Inside the Halbousi Alliance
According to informed sources:
“There are deep disagreements within the leadership of the Halbousi Alliance due to what some have termed a ‘veto’ on a third term for Nouri al-Maliki.”
Another key revelation states:
“Important figures within the Halbousi Alliance were dissatisfied with the statement issued by the National Political Council, which implicitly vetoed a third term for Maliki.”
This tells us one thing clearly:
👉 Support for Maliki is far from unified.
The Real Question: What Will the United States Do?
Now comes the wildcard.
How will U.S. President Donald Trump respond if Maliki is officially announced?
Will Washington oppose it openly?
Will pressure escalate quietly behind the scenes?
Or is there something unfolding that we don’t yet see?
One thing is certain:
The U.S. does not want a weak, Iran-influenced Iraqi government.
Timing Matters: Trump Wants Progress — Not Delays
President Trump has been clear in his strategic posture toward Iraq:
Move Iraq forward
Stabilize governance
Reduce Iranian influence
Enable economic normalization
He does not have unlimited time.
With only a limited term remaining, Washington wants results, not regression.
A Maliki return would almost certainly be seen as a setback, not progress.
Why a Maliki Government Would Delay Reinstatement
Let’s be honest:
Maliki = instability
Instability = no U.S. approval
No U.S. approval = no reinstatement
No matter what other “intel gurus” claim, the U.S. will not sign off on reinstatement without a stable government.
And stability means:
No armed militias in government
No Iranian dominance
No rigged parliament
The Bigger Issue: Iranian Militias Inside Parliament
Here’s where things get even more serious.
In the article:
“US, IN CONTROL OF OIL DOLLARS, HEAPS PRESSURE ON IRAQ OVER IRANIAN INFLUENCE”
we learn that the U.S. explicitly warned Iraqi leaders months before the election:
No armed groups in the new government.
That message could not have been clearer.
The Reality: 58 Iran-Linked MPs Elected
Despite U.S. warnings, the recent election resulted in:
58 members of parliament linked to Iranian militia factions
One deputy speaker of parliament with similar affiliations
From Washington’s perspective, these individuals:
Undermine sovereignty
Serve Iranian interests
Threaten financial stability
U.S. officials reportedly stated:
“Engagement with the new government would be suspended if these members are represented.”
Why This Matters for the Dinar Reinstatement
The U.S. holds a powerful lever:
➡️ Over $100 billion in Iraqi oil revenues held in New York banks.
Oil sales remain dollar-denominated, even after UN sanctions were lifted in December 2022.
Ask yourself:
What happens if the U.S. restricts dollar access?
How does Iraq pay its budget?
How does it fund salaries, imports, and infrastructure?
This leverage is intentional — and effective.
Sovereignty vs Reality
The Coordination Framework argues:
“Iraq is a sovereign nation and can choose its leaders freely.”
But Washington’s response is blunt:
👉 Sovereignty does not exist when foreign militias control the system.
Iranian influence disqualifies the claim of independence.
End of discussion.
What This Means Going Forward
This election cycle is about far more than Maliki.
It is about:
Parliament integrity
Iranian militia infiltration
U.S. financial leverage
Iraq’s economic future
A puppet prime minister plus a compromised parliament equals disaster.
Checks and balances matter — and right now, they are under threat.
Q&A: Key Questions Answered
Can parliament veto Maliki’s nomination?
Yes. Parliament has full authority to reject a third term.
Is the Halbousi Alliance unified behind Maliki?
No. Deep internal disagreements exist.
Does the U.S. oppose Iranian militias in government?
Absolutely. This has been clearly communicated.
Would a Maliki government delay reinstatement?
Highly likely due to instability and U.S. opposition.
Does the U.S. still control Iraq’s oil revenue?
Yes. Over $100 billion remains under U.S. control in New York.
Final Thoughts
This is not over.
Not even close.
If the Coordination Framework pushes Maliki forward, they may:
Expose their own corruption
Trigger U.S. retaliation
Collapse their political credibility
Sometimes pressure reveals truth.
So for now, we wait.
We watch.
And we let the drama unfold.
Stay Connected & Informed
🔗 Blog: https://dinarevaluation.blogspot.com/
📢 Telegram: https://t.me/DINAREVALUATION
📘 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064023274131
🐦 Twitter/X: https://x.com/DinaresGurus
📺 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@DINARREVALUATION
Hashtags
#MNTGOAT #IraqPolitics #Maliki #IraqRV
#ParliamentVeto #IranInfluence #USPressure
#OilDollars #DinarReinstatement
#MiddleEastGeopolitics #IraqElections
MNT GOAT
There is also yet another element that may block Maliki from becoming the next prime minister. Many overlook this element. Remember that Parliament also has to ratify the nominee when announced. So, in this next article titled “SHARP DISAGREEMENTS WITHIN THE HALBOUSI COALITION OVER THE VETO OF A THIRD TERM FOR MALIKI” we learn that parliament may not go along with Maliki for a third term and may use the power of veto on his nomination.
I quote from the article – “Informed sources revealed on Sunday the existence of deep disagreements within the leadership of the Halbousi Alliance due to what some have termed a “veto” on a third term for Nouri al-Maliki.” – “The source told Al-Maalouma that “important figures within the Halbousi Alliance were dissatisfied with the statement issued by the National Political Council, which implicitly vetoed a third term for Maliki, despite the support of the Alliance’s constituent forces for him as a candidate to form the next government.”
Just remember that the circus is not yet over until the fat lady sings….lol…lol..lol..
Now the surprise will be to see how the US president Donald Trump feels about this announcement of Nori al-Maliki as the next prime minister. Will he oppose it or is there something that we don’t know about. Is God going to use Maliki to wake up the Iraqi politicians as he did in the US using the Biden era? How bad could it get in the next four years? Will God let Iraq suffer for this time again? Will we have to wait another four (4) years and even what state will Iraq be in after four more years of Maliki?
There is not much more I can say about this recent announcement about Maliki the peanut head guy as the nominee. We can see today through the news from Iraq that the Coordination Framework fully intends to nominate him for prime minister. This is where they are going to make their huge mistake and expose their own corruption. God works in strange ways. Let’s just sit tight and watch the drama play out. Like you, I feel this will be a set back in our timing of the reinstatement if this does occur. We all know president Trump wants to move Iraq along while he can and he only has another three years in office as president. He wants the reinstatement as bad as we do.
The election drama continues….
Oh… but wait there is more drama playing out in parliament too from this election cycle. There is much more than just the prime minister nominee to worry about.
So, there is also yet another issue lingering that needs to be addressed for this election cycle. It is just as important as the Maliki drama, if not more important. Having an Iranian pacifier as a puppet prime minister, than also a rigged parliament to vote his way on bills is not good for Iraq. They need checks and balances in the government. If we read the article titled “US, IN CONTROL OF OIL DOLLARS, HEAPS PRESSURE ON IRAQ OVER IRANIAN INFLUENCE” we learn more.
In this recent article we learn that the US has threatened senior Iraqi politicians with sanctions targeting the Iraqi state — including potentially its critical supply of oil revenue sourced via the Federal Reserve Bank of New York — should Iran-backed armed groups be included in the next government, four sources told Reuters. This threat was given months before the election. However Iraq did not pay much attention to it.
The US stance was simple “No armed groups in new government”. Can it get any clearer? So, in the newly elected representatives in parliament are there any members of armed militia groups? Let’s explore both sides to this story today. Who is on the right side and who is wrong?
So, YES there is many Iranian militia faction members from the recent November election cycle elected into office to replace other members in the chamber of parliament. In fact there is 58 members total to be exact , plus one deputy head of parliament. The US views all of these new members as linked to Iran. The fear is they will influence Iraqi politics to extent to benefit Iran rather than the people of Iraq. “The American line was basically that they would suspend engagement with the new government should any of those 58 MPs be represented.” No remember that the US is absolutely not going to signoff on the reinstatement of the dinar unless there is a STABLE government in place. Do you think this is a stable government? I don’t care with what any of these other intel gurus are telling you. They are full of sh-t! Oh… their secret sources have been so accurate with their stupid lies of every day and every weekend RV scenarios. How can anyone even believe their crap any more. You have to be an idiot just like them to follow them.
But I am showing you today evidence and facts and trying to help you understand that there is much more to it to the US plans to shut down this Iranian influence. It gets complicated real fast but not really if you try to clarify it and understand it.
Remember the US has leverage over Iraq as they maintain control of over 100 billion dollars of Iraqi oil revenues in the banks in NYC. Oil is still mandated to be sold in US dollars even though we learned that the UN sanctions have been lifted since December 2022. So, I guess maintaining this leverage of not releasing these funds to Iraq was a good choice by the US? Can you imagine if the US were to cut of all dollars to Iraq? How would Iraq pay its bills as in the budget?
So, the Iraqi Coordination Framework stance is that Iraq is an independent state. a sovereign nation and so they can do as they please electing officials in their government. But as we find this stance is not actually a correct stance, says the US administration. It is not correct as there is Iran influence and this does not meet the requirement of “sovereignty” and “independence”. Sorry Iraq!!!!